Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2003
- Messages
- 61,774
How dare they. You're only supposed to protect dolls, not girls.This is lovely, mind you.
How dare they. You're only supposed to protect dolls, not girls.This is lovely, mind you.
I wonder what percentage of transvestites want access to women's spaces whether women like it or not.That's horrific. And absolutely perverted. It's even worse than I had thought.
When will society and law enforcement re-discover the truth that there is a strong correlation between male cross-dressing and sexual offending?
I didn’t know that. Thanks. This piece of ◊◊◊◊ was also a racist One Nation Senator.
Some how, him being one of Pauline "Pump Jet" Hanson's offsiders doesn't really surprise me at all!I didn’t know that. Thanks. This piece of ◊◊◊◊ was also a racist One Nation Senator.
There's a response from "Barbie" at the bottom of that Tweet incidentally.I see "Barbie Kardashian" has been released from jail. He was in solitary confinement there because of the danger he posed to the women in the prison he was held in, but they've just turned him loose on the streets of Limerick. He's already giving out the list of people he intends to murder, I understand, starting with his own mother.
And according to the law in Ireland, he is absolutely permitted in any and all female single-sex facilities, and to attempt to exclude him would be a crime.
There's a response from "Barbie" at the bottom of that Tweet incidentally.
And people wonder why some people are afraid of clowns….I see "Barbie Kardashian" has been released from jail.
Wow.Here is the audio of that interview. He sounds completely sane, except for the things he says!
There is little doubt that this violent, perverted freak is a far bigger danger to women than to men - but women just need to suck it up and get with the program.... amirite?I didn't get very far with it either I have to say.
I mean, I'm sorry for the men who would have to cope with his presence in the men's facilities if justice were done and he were to be excluded from women's facilities. But the fact is that he is a man, and women should not be forced to accept him and his like in women's facilities on the basis that excluding him might make him, or indeed other affected men, sad. I'm sorry, but I think men are better able to look after themselves in the presence of homicidal maniacs than women are. I think women's feeling are a bit important too, not just the feelings of delusional men.
The employer is Leonardo, IIRC a defence engineering company which has claimed to be strongly supportive of women in engineering.There's another employment tribunal ongoing at the moment where a woman is trying to get her employer to provide single sex toilets. As usual, there were single sex toilets until a few years ago, but then a handful of men were told they could use the women's toilets without the women being consulted or even informed.
There is little doubt that this violent, perverted freak is a far bigger danger to women than to men - but women just need to suck it up and get with the program.... amirite?
The employer is Leonardo, IIRC a defence engineering company which has claimed to be strongly supportive of women in engineering.
Having followed some of the tribunal on twitter, this looks like the start of a new trend where the aim is not simply a financial settlement but to put the managers who implemented the policy on the witness stand to be demolished through cross-examination.
Usually employment claims can be settled by making a large financial offer (which I suspect has already happened here) but in this case it looks as if it may need a complete apology and a renunciation of Stonewall-led policy.
Yeah, @Rolfe has nailed it I think. Like the Sandie Peggie case, it looks like they aren't interested in any offers. They wan't a legal precedent-setting win in court, and given the Supreme Court decision, its hard to see them not getting it.The employer is Leonardo, IIRC a defence engineering company which has claimed to be strongly supportive of women in engineering.
Having followed some of the tribunal on twitter, this looks like the start of a new trend where the aim is not simply a financial settlement but to put the managers who implemented the policy on the witness stand to be demolished through cross-examination.
Usually employment claims can be settled by making a large financial offer (which I suspect has already happened here) but in this case it looks as if it may need a complete apology and a renunciation of Stonewall-led policy.
NC: Previously equal provision for men and women. Now after your changes the men have their own, and the women's is now for both men and women.
AL: We made the change to give MK privacy and dignity
NC - I'm happy to carry on until lunchtime. But the witness might like a break...