• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Trump's Second Term

Foster Zygote said:
Any thoughts as to why Melania was doing Big Trouble in Little China cosplay in Britain?
View attachment 64007
Click to expand...


I don't know, I still think of it as her Spy vs Spy look:

AA1xXtcY.jpg
 
Jack by the hedge said:
Who should Kimmel shoot to get his job back?
Click to expand...
It has not reached that stage yet, but if the ballot box fails to stop the coming dictatorship, then armed force is totally justified.
Of course that takes some courage, and my own opinion is the resistance to Trump has far too people who simply lack the guts to actually do anything.
 
I donlt hink I am long for this website. We now have an semi offical ideology, and anybody who differs from it is persona non grata.
 
AmyStrange said:
I don't know, I still think of it as her Spy vs Spy look:

AA1xXtcY.jpg
Click to expand...
This was a decent example of that. The picture that had been in question really isn't that, though. As I said before, she's far more of an unobtrusive hat rack in that picture. That's markedly different from her Spy vs. Spy looks, though there is some similarity.
 
Andy_Ross said:
Trump Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt: "It was supposed to be a unifying and bipartisan church service ... everybody there was shocked and mortified by the disturbing comments from this bishop who chose to weaponize the pulpit ... she spewed lies ... she should apologize to President Trump for the lies that she told. It's despicable."

Video in link

https://twitter.com/x/status/1882162590295404919
Click to expand...

Sorry, quoting another old post, but what's despicable, is telling the lies that all "illegal" immigrants are "criminals." Last time I checked, babies, little children, and young teenagers are completely incapable of travelling to and crossing over international lines all by themselves, and cannot ever be held responsible for committing any such "crime" as crossing a border.

Also, the entire immigration thing is completely unconstitutional to begin with. The SCOTUS illegally changed the word "commerce" to mean normal human traffic. The Constitution does NOT give Congress the power to regulate travelling humans. They ONLY have the power to regulate commerce, and the SCOTUS changed the definition, thereby, "legislating from the bench," which is something that the right wing has been crying about for literal decades.

Also, another major violation of the Constitution: The Supremecy Clause.

The Constitution makes all treaties that Congress and the President signs, as the "law of the land" just like the Constitution itself. Any labelling or deporting of anyone who is fleeing conflict or natural disaster are granted refugee status,and absolutely ARE allowed to cross over the border without stopping at any checkpoints first. Especially when their lives are in immediate danger.

And finally, its a major violation of the Bible itself as well, as even the Old Testament (not to mention Jesus himself) commands to "welcome the stranger to the land, for you were once strangers yourself."
 
dudalb said:
It has not reached that stage yet,
but if the ballot box fails to stop the coming dictatorship then armed force is totally justified.
Of course that takes some courage, and my own opinion is the resistance to Trump has far too people who simply lack the guts to actually do anything.
Click to expand...
It ain't a coincidence that more than a few prominent voices are touting a "400 days to save Democracy" as we know it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom