It was demonstrated in court that police did not provide Knox with Lumumba's name and AK herself in the dock confirmed it.
Knox never gave the police PL's name until Ficarra brought up the text from him. This is what Ficarra saw:
Anyone with any intellectual honesty at all would know that one of the first things Ficarra would have asked her is "Who is 'Patrik'?
That is how is name was first brought up.
The police are only obliged to tell an interviewee they are entitled to a lawyer, there is no compulsion to provide one.
Once they become a suspect, as every court agree happened at the 1:45 statement, Italian law required she have a lawyer. Both Italy (2008) and the ECHR (2019) found that right was violated.
The police did not tell Knox they had evidence that confirmed Lumumba killed Mez. That is a lie suggested by the late Ron Hendry when he claimed police found 'black hairs' so they knew it was a black guy.
"her hands were bloodstained and were protected with plastic bags in order to allow sample collection, as some hairlike fibres could be seen." (Massei, pg 110)
"As for what appeared to be hairlike filaments found on the victim's body, when examined under a microscope they appeared to be strands of wool and gave no results." (Massei, pg. 190)
Absolute rubbish about the 'see you later' message. Italians know perfectly well what 'see you later' means.
So all Italians, even those who don't speak English like Ficarra, know what 'see you later means'?
They were alerted to that message because Knox had a noticeable physiological reaction of shock and horror that the cops had called up that message because she thought she had deleted it!
There's that psychic ability of yours again! You know 'why' she reacted and that she 'thought' she had deleted it. Let's put on that critical thinking hat: Since we know from Lumumba's own testimony that his text to her, and therefore, her reply, were perfectly innocent, just WHY would she have such an extreme reaction to it?
She realised it placed her in Grimana Piazza
Why would it place her at the piazza when even Massei (pg. 77) agrees the cell tower used was NOT the one that serves the cottage and Piazza Grimana just across the street:
the 20.42 phone call and the two visits by Popovic to the Corso Garibaldi's apartment) and by the location of the cell towers that were logged in by the sms exchange between Patrick Diya Lumumba and Amanda Knox, which put Amanda in a place other than the one served by the cell serving via della Pergola 7
Additionally, Massei (pg. 317) states Knox's text to PL used a cell tower that served Sollecito's apartment:
As for the location of the apparatus [the phone], the call made at 20:42:56 on 1.11.07 used the Via Beradi sector 7 cell, which serves the houses located along Corso Garibaldi.
Your claim is 100% disproved.
(we know the pair were aware of phone tracking because they both switched off their phones for the night shortly after Lumumba's message).
There's that psychic mind reading once again telling you what Knox knew!
She knew she had been caught out lying about her alibi which was she was home all evening.
Because she knew her text to Lumumba would place her at Piazza Grimana and not at Raffaele's apartment....right?
So the cops, being experienced in this type of body language, were alerted that they had hit a raw nerve.
Oh, lordy. Resorting to 'the cops were experienced in body language' rubbish, you really are having to scrape the bottom of the barrel!
Together with Napoleoni putting her head around the door and whispering to Ficarra that Sollecito had withdrawn his alibi for Knox. This was why they homed in on the 'see you later' message.
Wait a minute. Just above you said
Absolute rubbish about the 'see you later' message. Italians know perfectly well what 'see you later' means. The cops knew it was a BIG clue.
Now you think it was a "BIG clue"?
How were they "right" in knowing it was a "big clue"? Did, in fact, Knox meet Lumumba later that night and take him to the cottage to murder Kercher? Yes or No will suffice.
