First of all I don't impose my expectations on how adults should conduct their relationships, that's entirely up to them. Secondly I've read interviews with actors - non porn actors - that have mentioned that there can be issues in their relationships because of what they have to do with other actors when filming.
What a totally bizarre short circuit of logic and context.
No, you backed yourself into a corner and can't answer. Porn sex is real. It's why we don't let children take part.
Please define exactly what this "pernicious" effect actually is. Go into detail, if you can.
Anything? Your post is confusing. I pointed how wrong your were with your:
Everyone agrees with the principles in the UNCRC? - yet you post:
If everyone agreed with it's principles then everyone would be inclined to implement it. It is far from the appeal to popularity you suggest.
I know about Zeno's paradox, but I have no idea what you are referring to.
We are back to that Mandela quote and whether society does actually prioritise children as he thinks we should.
Pointing out, as you are, that most prioritise easy-access porn does not make this argument dead in any way whatsoever.
If you had read my argument carefully then you would know that I clearly argued that any law that proscribes something will have interpretational issues with it's definition of what that something is.
Like I said what a bizzare short circuit of logic and ignoring of context.
Since I affirm that porn sex is real, then my stance is that no child should ever participate. That would be clear to anyone following the thread.
If by this you are asking whether an actual physical penis penetrates an actual physical vagina, or whatever it is that the actors are playing out in the scene, then on this naïvely simplistic level, yes. But this isn't the gotcha that you think it is.
I just asked if it is real sex. There is nothing remotely naïve or simplistic about it. Your comparison with movies was wrong. What are you suggesting - that sexual experimentation that imitates porn doesn't occur? As an example of this, strangulation is now normal, as already cited - in fact, rough sex in general is very normal among the younger generation.
Is anything or anyone preventing you from looking this up? A search engine?
Given my recent comments, you are, however, forced to agree that actual physical sex is occurring aren't you?
I have to prove your claim? No, that is not how this works, Poem. If you know that others agree with you, it should be easy for you to link to them.
I am content not to prove that I am not the only one who thinks we should ban porn.
I'm not forced to agree to anything - I have given you my answer.
You didn't answer the question. Is actual physical sex happening - yes or no?
Then you could have answered yes, it's just you, or, if the others who share that view are your friends and relatives, for instance, you could have said as much. I thought perhaps some of the sources you have often linked to earlier in this thread, or others with professional knowledge (perhaps child psychologists specialised in childhood abuse and trauma) agreed with you, and would have been very interested to read their arguments for such a ban. But it's just your opinion, which is perfectly alright, if not very persuasive.
So many people see this gotcha coming that you should be getting paid for it.