I can't see how, but it doesn't matter. No amount of equivocation, backpedaling, and evasion on your part will make you a scientist or anything else. You simply can't demonstrate that you know what you're talking about. Therefore the claims you make that require us to agree that you do remain unconvincing.
What?
But you aren't a scientist.
You said in your previous post "IMV it could well be suicide in the face of near certain death, as being the captain, he couldn't leave the ship, as Andresson was very old school and trained at a Russian naval academy. In WWII, torpedoed German ships would have a flurry of SS officers shooting dead their wives and children before killing themself, rather than face drowning and fear."
Today I am a professional baseball player. I can't wait until the checks start rolling in!
That rebrand was a classic example of polishing a turd. Which, in the context of this thread, is fairly apposite.
As another poster noted, Vixen is mangling the phrase "Kraft durch Freude" here. Because she knows what she's talking about and chooses her words carefully.
She has been unable to display proficiency consistent with her claims to expertise.
...and therefore without access to the information and tools he would have had as the commission chair. We were told that Meister's account had to be considered especially authoritative because of the information he was privy to.
Capt Heinz Schön didn't manage to shoot himself because whilst he was screaming he'd run out of bullets after shooting his wife and two children (she was begging, 'Put an end to this!') and demanding another gun, as he had run out of bullets for himself, he slid off into the sea. I think with military guys it's an honour thing, but quite a lot of those without guns were said to have slashed their wrists in fear of facing drowning. I was putting this forward as an equally likely scenario for Capt Andresson as anything more nefarious.
What?
www.dw.com
Just checked: soz, it's Heinz Schön witnessing a senior officer in a brown party uniform and a swastika armband. My bad. Schön was on the aft deck superstructure.What?
For Heinz Schön, who passed away in 2013, that was a horrible thought. He was 18 years old at the time, aboard the Gustloff as an aspiring naval pay clerk. Although he was one of the very few survivors, and wrote a book about his experiences, he was always reticent to call the sinking of the Gustloff a war crime. It was ultimately carrying soldiers, sailing under enemy colors and lightly armed, making it a valid target for Soviet subs.
Wilhelm Gustloff sinking — 75 years on – DW – 01/30/2020
Over 9,000 people died in the Baltic Sea on January 30, 1945, in an attempt to evade the Red Army. The Wilhelm Gustloff was the most lethal shipwreck in history, but some details of the sinking remain unknown.
The captain of the ship died of a heart attack before they were even torpedoed.
ETA: is there even any evidence that there was a handgun available on the bridge of the Estonia? Was it common practice for Baltic car ferries to keep weapons aboard in the 1990's?
Surely you mean infrastructure.
And I think Meister was possibly motivated by national pride and trying to fend off blame being put on the Estonians, as the Estonia was their flagship, etcetera, etcetera.
smh
How many mistakes can you make in one post? So Heinz Schön was the witness, and not the captain, and it wasn't the captain doing the shooting but someone else entirely.
Still fourth-hand hearsay.
No. Your claim, support it.
