theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
The principle that biological sex trumps any self-id, when it comes to sex segregation, seems quite weighty to me.No, that the Proclamation of Smartcooky has any weight at all.
What's the basis of your disagreement?
The principle that biological sex trumps any self-id, when it comes to sex segregation, seems quite weighty to me.No, that the Proclamation of Smartcooky has any weight at all.
Whether we are even talking about sex segregation is the first point to be ironed out. See the first 15 installments of this threadThe principle that biological sex trumps any self-id, when it comes to sex segregation, seems quite weighty to me.
What's the basis of your disagreement?
Would it be so very different that people wouldn't toss out oversimplified solutions like the first quote in post #11,223?The debate about trans rights in public policy would be very different, if it were actually about finding the right restroom for people who pass as the opposite sex.
I thought we'd reached consensus on this point somewhat earlier. We are talking about sex segregation and gender (i.d.) segregation and whether one ought to win out in some specific contexts.Whether we are even talking about sex segregation is the first point to be ironed out.
We have always and ever and only been talking about sex segregation.Whether we are even talking about sex segregation is the first point to be ironed out. See the first 15 installments of this thread
Mu. What complexity do you believe the "oversimplified" solution overlooks?Would it be so very different that people wouldn't toss out oversimplified solutions like the first quote in post #11,223?
Its not an oversimplification at all. Its what we have always done.Would it be so very different that people wouldn't toss out oversimplified solutions like the first quote in post #11,223?
I don't think it's a particularly pro-feminist plan to force passing trans men into women's spaces.What complexity do you believe the "oversimplified" solution overlooks?
I don't think it's a particularly pro-feminist plan to force passing trans men into women's spaces.Its not an oversimplification at all. Its what we have always done.
Nobody is doing that.I don't think it's a particularly pro-feminist plan to force passing trans men into women's spaces.
Nobody is doing that.I don't think it's a particularly pro-feminist plan to force passing trans men into women's spaces.
We have always been at war with Eurasia.We have always and ever and only been talking about sex segregation.
The hilited has yet again been claimed to not exist, because it undermines half of the anti-trans platform. The other half of the platform is the tweetys of individual transpeople doing bad things or not looking convincingly ladylike, in microscopic proportion to the actual trans population.I thought we'd reached consensus on this point somewhat earlier. We are talking about sex segregation and gender (i.d.) segregation and whether one ought to win out in some specific contexts.
Here's the thing y'all keeping missing - if the person passes, I mean ACTUALLY passes, no-one's ever going to know anyway.I don't think it's a particularly pro-feminist plan to force passing trans men into women's spaces.
I don't think it's a particularly pro-feminist plan to force passing trans men into women's spaces.
Rubbish. They affect half the population... the women... you know, the half of the population you don't give a flying ◊◊◊◊ about.It just amazes me how this thread goes on an on and on . As if these people's lives affect any of yours more than coincidentally.
There a thread to discuss that...In the meantime Trump is destroying the World economy and promoting racism and corruption.
But the hatred against people that are different is an obsession.
No, it's right on. Approximately 1 in 200 people identify as transgender in the US. Their lives barely intersect others.Rubbish. They affect half the population... the women... they affect every single women I know... my daughters, grand-daughters, female siblings, female friends, colleagues and acquaintances. NOT ONE OF THEM WANTS TO SHARE A TOILET, BATHROOM, CHANGING ROOM, RESTROOM, OR HOSPITAL WARD WITH ANY BIOLOGICAL MAN. (I have asked them, so I know!)
Only a rank misogynist ****-hole would force that on any woman, let alone on women who actual MEAN something to them. Maybe you don't care about the women in your life... if so, that's your choice.
There a thread to discuss that...
General thread.
To kick off, a list of appointees to key positions, notable for their loyalty to Trump.
![]()
Trump's picks for key positions in his second administration
Donald Trump is starting to fill key posts in his administration, putting an emphasis on aides and allies who were his strongest backers during the campaign.apnews.com
- Orphia Nay
- trump trump administration
- Replies: 41,569
- Forum: USA Politics
Your framing of the issue sucks!
No, it's right on. Approximately 1 in 200 people identify as transgender in the US. Their lives barely intersect others.
dailynexus.com
quillette.com
If you are genuinely interested in why I think you are wrong (and I doubt you are genuinely interested) you will put aside an hour to watch this video of Frances Widdowson (mentioned above) interviewing Mia Hughes, author of "The WPATH Files". You will find out about the massive destruction to many young lives brought about by the Transgender Rights Activist movement - the people YOU support. You will find out have debate is not permistted, and dissentersr are silenced.No, it's right on. Approximately 1 in 200 people identify as transgender in the US. Their lives barely intersect others.
It won't make any difference. In the unlikely event that ECHL tries to over-rule the UK Supreme Court, the UK will simply tell the ECHR to shove it where the monkey put the nut... and it wouldn't be the first time they did that. The Northern Ireland conflict, Rwandan illegal immigrant deportations and the Iraq War detainees issue are three prior examples.Looks lke the UKSC decision may be going to the ECHR.
![]()
UK’s first transgender judge seeks rehearing of supreme court case on biological sex
Exclusive: Victoria McCloud says court undermined her rights to a fair trial when it refused to hear her evidencewww.theguardian.com
Beat me to it. The ECHR is safely ignored. The worst that can happen is a few angry press releases.It won't make any difference. In the unlikely event that ECHL tries to over-rule the UK Supreme Court, the UK will simply tell the ECHR to shove it where the monkey put the nut... and it wouldn't be the first time they did that. The Northern Ireland conflict, Rwandan illegal immigrant deportations and the Iraq War detainees issue are three prior examples.