Cuomo defeated in NYC Democratic Mayoral Primary

bruto said:
So it seems as if the Democrats made another tactical error here, running a rapist against a liar, when everyone knows these days the way to power is to find someone who is both at the same time.
Click to expand...
Adams= bribe taker, fraud maker.

Cuomo= rapist, liar.

Momdani= liar.

Does Sliwa have any skeletons in his closet?
 
sinnikal said:
Really? Really? Is this the most salient issue to be discussing, when the main takeaway from the whole story is that New York (City) has laid down a big marker to show which direction they are inclined to go after just a few months after the inauguration. A strong one.

The marker they laid down is pointless in the scheme of things, probably, but this bollocks about the semantic difference between some social constructs is laughable.
Click to expand...

What really matters is who's getting lots of attention.
 
Hercules56 said:
Momdani says if Israel's PM comes to NYC while he is Mayor, he will arrest him in accordance with the ICC warrant.

nypost.com

Israeli PM Netanyahu responds to Dem mayoral nominee Mamdani's threat to arrest him

Last year, Mamdani said that he would not welcome Netanyahu to New York City in light of the International Criminal Court’s warrant for Netanyahu’s arrest.
nypost.com nypost.com
Click to expand...

Trausti said:
It he going to do that personally? The ICC has no authority in the US.
Click to expand...

I don't know how it is in New York, but typically mayors do not have the authority to order arrests. The reasons for this should be as obvious as they are sensible, but here we are.
 
Hercules56 said:
I guess he will order the NYPD to do it.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure New York city isn't pants-on-head-retarded enough to give its mayor the authority to order arrests.

I'm pretty sure only a judge with proper jurisdiction can issue valid arrest warrants. Since the IPCC has no jurisdiction in New York, NYPD cannot lawfully enforce IPCC warrants.

I'm not sure how you imagine this whole "international law" thing is supposed to work, but from what I can tell so far, your concept seems to be stupid and wrong.
 
theprestige said:
I don't know how it is in New York, but typically mayors do not have the authority to order arrests. The reasons for this should be as obvious as they are sensible, but here we are.
Click to expand...
Well, as Mayor has delegated police power to the Commissioner of Police, he can order an arrest. Arrest for violating an international law? No idea.

Netanyahu had not violated any Federal law or State law, so the arrest might be illegal.
 
Last edited:
Hercules56 said:
Well, as Mayor has delegated police power to the Commissioner of Police, he can order an arrest.
Click to expand...
Are you sure the mayor has delegable arrest authority?

And even if he did, arrest authority is still subject to certain rules. If the police have not witnessed a crime, or have reasonable suspicion of a crime, or some other immediate public safety concern, they cannot lawfully arrest someone without a warrant.

Nobody in New York City has the authority to arrest someone just because they want to. Not the mayor. Not the commissioner of police. Not the cops themselves. Not even judges.

The whole concept is blatantly anti-social and unjust. You shouldn't let your fetish for "international law" blind you to Mamdani's stupidity.


Hercules56 said:
Arrest for violating an international law? No idea.
Click to expand...
What authority has jurisdiction over Netanyahu, that they can lawfully order his arrest for ignoring their mandates?

Hercules56 said:
Netanyahu had not violated any Federal law or State law, so the arrest might be illegal.
Click to expand...
Not might. Absolutely would be illegal.

Mamdani's fantasy that the office of the mayor of New York city is an enforcement arm of the IPCC is as perverse as it is insane. Very on brand for the people whose votes won him the Democrat primary.
 
theprestige said:
Are you sure the mayor has delegable arrest authority?

And even if he did, arrest authority is still subject to certain rules. If the police have not witnessed a crime, or have reasonable suspicion of a crime, or some other immediate public safety concern, they cannot lawfully arrest someone without a warrant.

Nobody in New York City has the authority to arrest someone just because they want to. Not the mayor. Not the commissioner of police. Not the cops themselves. Not even judges.

The whole concept is blatantly anti-social and unjust. You shouldn't let your fetish for "international law" blind you to Mamdani's stupidity.



What authority has jurisdiction over Netanyahu, that they can lawfully order his arrest for ignoring their mandates?


Not might. Absolutely would be illegal.

Mamdani's fantasy that the office of the mayor of New York city is an enforcement arm of the IPCC is as perverse as it is insane. Very on brand for the people whose votes won him the Democrat primary.
Click to expand...
The arrest would be 100% based on the arrest warrant issued by the ICC.

IPCC??????????? WTF are you talking about??
 
theprestige said:
Are you sure the mayor has delegable arrest authority?

And even if he did, arrest authority is still subject to certain rules. If the police have not witnessed a crime, or have reasonable suspicion of a crime, or some other immediate public safety concern, they cannot lawfully arrest someone without a warrant.

Nobody in New York City has the authority to arrest someone just because they want to. Not the mayor. Not the commissioner of police. Not the cops themselves. Not even judges.

The whole concept is blatantly anti-social and unjust. You shouldn't let your fetish for "international law" blind you to Mamdani's stupidity....
Click to expand...
Bro, watch your mouth.
 
Hercules56 said:
The arrest would be 100% based on the arrest warrant issued by the ICC.
Click to expand...
The ICC has no jurisdiction in New York. There is no lawful way for the NYPD to execute such a warrant, no matter how much the mayor impotently wishes they would.

You seem to be deeply confused about what "international law" means, and the basis of its enforcement.

You should consider the possibility that the compound phrase has a different meaning from its constituent parts. You might be surprised (and hopefully embarrassed) to discover that "law" has very little to do with it, despite the name.

Hercules56 said:
IPCC??????????? WTF are you talking about??
Click to expand...
The ICC. I'm so sorry my typo caused you a dozen question marks' worth of agitation.
 
Last edited:
theprestige said:
I'm pretty sure New York city isn't pants-on-head-retarded enough to give its mayor the authority to order arrests.

I'm pretty sure only a judge with proper jurisdiction can issue valid arrest warrants. Since the IPCC has no jurisdiction in New York, NYPD cannot lawfully enforce IPCC warrants.

I'm not sure how you imagine this whole "international law" thing is supposed to work, but from what I can tell so far, your concept seems to be stupid and wrong.
Click to expand...
IPCC is very different from the ICC.

For a second it looked like you thought Netanyahu had a warrant out for his arrest for violating climate change rules.

I know you aren't that stupid.
 
Hercules56 said:
IPCC is very different from the ICC.

For a second it looked like you thought Netanyahu had a warrant out for his arrest for violating climate change rules.
Click to expand...
Haha yes! Such a silly typo! My bad. Again, I'm so sorry to have caused you such agitation.
Hercules56 said:
I know you aren't that stupid.
Click to expand...
Which is why I'm so confused about your pretense to the contrary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom