TGZ is not presenting those claims and links as evidence that you posted.
False Dichotomy.
No. The IAEA found Iran had enriched uranium well past the level needed for any civilian nuclear program. That was NOT in accordance with the NPT. Enriching uranium that much is basically the same thing as developing a nuke, because that’s the only reason to do it, and because that’s the hardest part about developing a nuke.
Israel is not a signatory to the NPT. As such, they are not bound by it and cannot violate it.
Why do you assume it was an accident?
Because we know from lots of experience that the Iranians are simply incapable of actually aiming at and striking an individual building. They simply don't have that capability.
The war criminality of accidentally hitting a hospital depends primarily on the military value of the intended target, and the anticipated military advantage of hitting that target. To a lesser degree, it also depends on the effort made to hit the intended target and miss other things, and on the selection of available weapons for the attack.
After Israel has flattened or seriously damaged many hospitals in Gaza the irony could hardly be thicker.
Exactly. Maybe Israel has learned a lesson?
That doesn't make it an accident. If they shot a missile at a square mile area knowing it could hit anywhere within that square mile area, and they hit something in that square mile area, that's not an accident. They hit their target.
Funny you should mention that. The hospital complex is something like 70+ acres. Right next door is a university, and surrounding it is residential areas. No military targets in sight. I'm fully willing to believe that Iran didn't specifically target this hospital because they lacked the accuracy to do so. But they fired at a city knowing they could hit a hospital or houses. It's not an accident that they did.
Sure, because the IDF was operating from that hospital.
So now Israel knows what its like to have their hospitals damaged by rocket fire. Maybe it will teach them a valuable lesson about not targeting civilian infrastructure.
Anything is possible.Sure, because the IDF was operating from that hospital.
You believe that Hamas was operating out of all those Gazan hospitals? I have a bridge you might want to buy.Sure, because the IDF was operating from that hospital.
Does the cognitive dissonance ever get to you? On the one hand, you're claiming Iran couldn't have targeted the hospital because they don't have the accuracy. On the other, you're claiming that maybe Iran was justified in targeting the hospital because it was being used by the military. Do you not realize that these are contradictory claims?
That's the Mossad motto, not the IDF motto. And EVERY intelligence service does that.
What, you think they wouldn't stoop that low? Looks like you already bought a bridge.
Funny how your desire for people to learn lessons only ever goes one way.
Iran hits hospitals by accident. Israel hits them on purpose.
