Sometimes all that is meant is that the insincere man has adopted a trans identity for purely utilitarian purposes, such as to have a cushier life in a women's jail, or maybe to be spared jail altogether on account of his delicate feelings, or to win something in an athletics competition. (I have great doubt that any - maybe beyond single figures - men do that.)
Other men, in this scenario, have real feelings of some sort which make their trans identity "real", but these are not defined. Sometimes it seems to mean that the men are not autogynaephiles. Are effeminate homosexual men (HSTS) "true" trans then? What is it about them that entitles them to that designation, and not the AGP cohort?
There is no roses-round-the-door reason for a man to want to be a woman or to pretend to be a woman. It's sexual fetish all the way down, with the exception of a few unfortunates with unrelated serious mental illness who come to believe that transitioning is what they need when they get sucked into the trans cult.
When my friend Ashley came out to me as trans, I didn't understand anything. What he said was "I think I'm really a woman." This made no sense to me. He wasn't a woman. You only had to look at him. He was a man, with all his bits in working order (at least according to his bidie-in Anne, who was also a part of our friendship group). There was no possible, rational way he could "really" be a woman. I just went along with it, utterly bemused. I remember saying to a friend, this is beyond weird and I don't understand any of it, but what can you say except "welcome, sister"? I didn't judge Ashley, and most of the time it didn't matter anyway. But looking back at his behaviour, which was sexualised from the get-go
, AGP is the explanation that makes sense.
It's only the Blanchard typography that makes any sense of any of this. But the trans cult are absolutely desperate that this should not be accepted, because they know very well that this understanding puts an end to the rationale they keep putting forward for men to be legally allowed in women's spaces. Look at the reaction last time I brought Blanchard up. (He's a jerk, by the way, but that doesn't prevent his being right.) A sudden riccochet into ravings about oscillating saws or something like that. It's got to the point where nobody can research anything or write anything or conclude anything about AGP for fear of the full force of trans cancellation descending. (Same thing with ROGD too - can't possibly acknowledge that this is a thing, all these confused friendship groups of adolescent girls who would have been starving themselves a generation ago are really truly for realsies actually men.)
Let trans-identifying men into women's single-sex spaces because they get off on it. Or because they get off on pretending to be women in the context of their homosexual relationship. Not a very strong position, is it? So it has to be the poor oppressed flower, the most marginalised group in society (middle-aged white heterosexual men, right!), who will be really sad, or even kill himself, if he doesn't get to pee in the Ladies'. Just knock it off, why don't you?
