Thermal
August Member
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Ed Applying luma curve to photos and footage
- Thread starter nt1
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 9/11 9/11 evidence
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
IF.
P.J. Denyer
Penultimate Amazing
To be honest, this thread was over when Jay explained exactly how the photo correction tool he's using worked & how it's misuse was causing these 'halos'. Not that I can see many people believing that cheap or free phone & tablet photo manipulation apps were some magic bullet to blow away a quarter century of cover up and disclose all manipulated photos anyway.
I think there are two questions left to answer-:
1) Does he have video footage of Prince Phillip assassinating Diana from behind the wheel of a white Fiat Polo?
2) Does this prove the existence of spirits?
I think there are two questions left to answer-:
1) Does he have video footage of Prince Phillip assassinating Diana from behind the wheel of a white Fiat Polo?
2) Does this prove the existence of spirits?
It's precisely the level of effort your contributions so far have merited.
Don't you recognize where you are? The Truther blogs are shut down or desolate. You can't get views on X or YouTube or TikTok with that stuff any more. This is the Attention Soup Kitchen for Homeless 9/11 Truthers.
Nah, I don't really think you got your "FBI Files" material from the TV show. I think you copied it from some other site that itself only cites unspecified "FBI files" as its source. You either can't be bothered to search for any real files (if they exist), or you've tried and failed to find any; either way, you're now hoping you can taunt others into doing that work for you. Talk about low effort!
Axxman300
Philosopher
What? You mean some 20-something isn't going to break 9-11 wide open with a photo app on his phone? Shocked! Shocked I say!
Axxman300
Philosopher
Here's the link to the FBI 9-11 files:
I'll sum it up: Al Qaeda did 9-11 and some Saudi's helped. Also, the CIA didn't tell the FBI stuff, but the FBI wasn't trying all that hard for a variety of reasons. That's it. That's all she wrote. Remember to tip your server.
I'll sum it up: Al Qaeda did 9-11 and some Saudi's helped. Also, the CIA didn't tell the FBI stuff, but the FBI wasn't trying all that hard for a variety of reasons. That's it. That's all she wrote. Remember to tip your server.
Well, they had to say that, didn’t they?
Its happening all the time. To this day. AI and composite photos in news
Archaeology in turmoil after sculptor's workshop thousands of years old found in Greece with intact figures and statues inside
Several life-size marble statues
amp.marca.com
Attachments
JimOfAllTrades
Master Poster
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,145
Axxman300
Philosopher
Cool, now tell us about AI in 2001. Tell us how fast CGI was rendered in 2001.View attachment 61541
Its happening all the time. To this day. AI and composite photos in news
Archaeology in turmoil after sculptor's workshop thousands of years old found in Greece with intact figures and statues inside
Several life-size marble statues
Claim: luma curve can reveal concern to examine the integrity of 9/11 footage.
Claim: it should show enough concern for a professional to publicly examine and comment.
Claim: a federal statement should be made about the results of multiple federal, accredited institutions, and independent reviews of the footage after applying photo forensic techniques.
----
I will be applying luma curve to footage.
A luma curve bends the light of an image.
Photo. 35mm. Digi. AI gen.
Video. Frame. Screenshot. AI gen.
I whole heartedly hope that you will shelve ego and consider. Dont be a "boomer and a touchscreen phone". Dont be a "caveman and fire". Dont be a "20 something champion for the next generation".
Look. Think. Personally investigate.
Do not. Allow. Your opinion. To be shaped by group or narrative. Least of all Personal gain in the form of currency.
This is a statement. I will now submit responses with organized examples. Have patiences.
Claim: it should show enough concern for a professional to publicly examine and comment.
Claim: a federal statement should be made about the results of multiple federal, accredited institutions, and independent reviews of the footage after applying photo forensic techniques.
----
I will be applying luma curve to footage.
A luma curve bends the light of an image.
Photo. 35mm. Digi. AI gen.
Video. Frame. Screenshot. AI gen.
I whole heartedly hope that you will shelve ego and consider. Dont be a "boomer and a touchscreen phone". Dont be a "caveman and fire". Dont be a "20 something champion for the next generation".
Look. Think. Personally investigate.
Do not. Allow. Your opinion. To be shaped by group or narrative. Least of all Personal gain in the form of currency.
This is a statement. I will now submit responses with organized examples. Have patiences.
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
I am now working on posts. Please do not flood this thread like my previous attempt.
I recieved a "paperclip to a gunfight" threat last time i tried.
Dont get it twisted. To tell someone they are in a "gunfight" is a threat. Not physical. Threat to opinion and thought. But dont get it twisted. It can easily be seen by someone as a physical threat.
I recieved a "paperclip to a gunfight" threat last time i tried.
Dont get it twisted. To tell someone they are in a "gunfight" is a threat. Not physical. Threat to opinion and thought. But dont get it twisted. It can easily be seen by someone as a physical threat.
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
No. Your method involving adjusting the luminance channel creates artifacts in photos that you speculatively attribute to image tampering.
Professionals have examined your images and reviewed your methods. They do not produce the effects you claim, and you have decided to ignore the advice of professional.
Your methods are not valid. There is no obligation for government or any other person to respond to it beyond what has already been done.
Yes, you have done this repeatedly without listening to any responses to it. It proves nothing.
Gibberish.
Gibberish. No generative AI for images was available in 2001. Your screenshots are from convenience sources. They are inevitably enlargements from sources that end up being oversampled and thereby overly susceptible to your wrong methods.
Ego has nothing to do with it. You do not have a foundation of understanding suitable to the claims you are making. When people show you that this is the case, you complain that you are being ill-treated.
You are not better or smarter than your critics. You do not have any better information. Your critics' statements are not coming from a place of bewilderment or ideological entrenchment. Your critics simply know more about the subject than you do.
No one is interested in indulging your self-aggrandizing claims if you are unwilling to address well-informed criticism.
JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
That is not a threat. It is an observation from well-experienced critics that you are not prepared to debate your claims seriously.
No, it's an analogy. And apt one. Stop posturing. Stop ignoring your critics. Address the errors in your purported evidence. If you believe you have been seriously threatened, report the posts for moderation. Do not insinuate as much for rhetorical effect.
Yet another reminder that this quoted post is nt1's unfinished business.
Pixel42
Schrödinger's cat
This was Andy's original post:
This was nt1's response to it:
Andy posted six photos soon afterwards. A post with six photos is hard to miss. No other posters seem to have missed it. Three posters have subsequently posted links back to it for him. Four days later we are still waiting for him to respond to the challenge he accepted.
So no, I don't think he has Andy on ignore. I think he has anything he doesn't he want to see on ignore.
See. The halo wont go away
I took a screenshot of a documentary filming the newspaper of the falling man. Halo still there.
Whether full fabrication or manipulation. It is not acceptable for the importance of the event.
I could spend 48 hours. The 35mm photos from 20 miles away in Jersey are the only ones i have found to be unaltered.
There WAS SMOKE COMING OUT THOSE BUILDINGS. THEY DID COLLAPSE.
The full story, documented with unaltered footage, has not been told.
Its simple as that.
Claim: the full story, told with footage that is not altered in any way, has never been told.
Claim: That is not acceptable.