Or just ones who naturally are not feminine enough, plenty of cis women get mistaken for trans and they should be excluded too. WOmen have to fit a certain mold after all
Even Blanchard didn't go so far as to claim that everyone who wants to change sex does so for erotic reasons.
Do those efforts really look any different from HSTS-enabling efforts?
We're not just talking about public restrooms. There's also locker rooms, spas, shelters, doctor's offices, prisons...
This kind of immediate dismissal of women's concerns, and minimizing of the implications and impact of self-ID to override sex segregation, is fairly toxic. I don't think this is the best you have to offer on this topic.
It's funny (not funny ha-ha though) how often it's males who don't care that males are invading female spaces and making females feel intimidated or uncomfortable. It also seems like a whole lot of males think that females should alter our general bathroom behavior so that we act like males in the restroom instead of being allowed to interact with each other the way that we normally do.
Masculine women have not been a problem in the entire history of sex segregation of public restrooms. This is an entirely artificial concern. I don't think this is the best you have to offer on this topic.
Sure, you as a male don't give a damn if males use female bathrooms. What females care about doesn't seem to be something you consider.
HTTP Strict Transport Security is designed to protect against man-in-the-middle attacks, so kind of the opposite, really.
In the original Blanchard typology, AGP wasn't the only category.
Even if true, how can we expect patrons to know?
I know, right?
Then they should be addressed uniquely.
I don't think so. I am far more concerned about how males with toxic masculinity deal with the issue than a rare encounter in a woman's bathroom where they think the person might be a male dressed as a female.
Why? Sex segregation has always addressed them all equally well.
Everything we've seen about the expansion of trans rights in public policy tells us that males with toxic masculinity aren't the big problem (except in the sense that trans rights activism tends to champion men at the expense of women, which is textbook toxic masculinity).
You're wrong. Trans individuals are 4 times more likely to be murdered and 6 times more likely to be assaulted than the general public. My guess is that women aren't assaulting and killing them .
I'd be surprised to learn that trans men are more likely to be murdered than natal males.
Now there's a bagful of conflicting laws in the making!
They are not "rare encounters", they are quite frequent but simply not reported, because under the current laws, the women doing the reporting will be labelled bigots and transphobes and could end up being arrested themselves. If you can be descended upon by half a dozen police constables armed with batons and pepper spray, handcuffed and imprisoned for eight hours for nothing more than a hurty Tweet, there is no telling what can happen if you offend TRAs and their allies, the "thought police"
www.lbc.co.uk
All of which has nothing whatever to do with women's shelters, rape crisis centres, prisons, bathrooms, changing rooms or women's sport, and none if which should be shouldered upon women to sort out.