Thermal
August Member
You seriously think a transwoman that had been raped herself might have 'no experience' or be able to give real support?
Presumably this is because you find it offensive for people who grew up without facing oppression on account of their ethnicity to put on makeup which allows them to perform offensive stereotypes of those who did.I'd certainly hope you would not be hanging around many people rocking the AL Jolson look.
You seriously think a transwoman that had been raped herself might have 'no experience' or be able to give real support?
Presumably this is because you find it offensive for people who grew up without facing oppression on account of their ethnicity to put on makeup which allows them to perform offensive stereotypes of those who did.
Now substitute "sex" in place of "ethnicity" and you'll have a sense of why some women are offended.
(Or, just watch a handful of Mulvaney's girlhood videos.)
Lotta bold claims in there. I'm guessing no factual support for any of them, like 'precisely zero' having been raped themselves?Yes. He knows nothing about a woman's experience. He needs to seek help tailored to his own experience, which is very different, and then if he feels the call, volunteer to help other transwomen who have been raped. No raped woman wants him anywhere near her, and if he had a shred of actual empathy he'd understand that.
However, precisely none of the perverted men in skirts who have tried to volunteer as counsellors at rape crisis centres have been raped. Not even the ones who took the centres to court to force them to give them access to raped women. And neither have any of the ones who have pretended to be victims so they can sit in on group counselling centres, either.
If you'd drop your belief in your own clairvoyance, it might occur to you that believing people to be on the whole pretty good is vastly different from your stated belief that virtually all men are pervy monsters.Thermal, your "see no evil, hear no evil" attitude to this is beyond naif. I find it difficult to believe that any man can reach adulthood and not realise how perverted some men are, the directions these perversions take, and the lengths they will go to satisfy them.
BOOM!!I actually agree with this. There is no goddamn reason to distinguish between sincere and insincere self-ID.
This is because there is no goddamn reason for males to override sex segregation, regardless of how they identify. When it comes to sports, prisons, locker rooms, bathrooms, representation, etc., it doesn't matter if they're sincere or not.
The only way a male's sincerity in claiming they are female actually matters is that such a person needs therapy, not women's sports.
Lotta bold claims in there. I'm guessing no factual support for any of them, like 'precisely zero' having been raped themselves?
If you'd drop your belief in your own clairvoyance, it might occur to you that believing people to be on the whole pretty good is vastly different from your stated belief that virtually all men are pervy monsters.
You do object to doing research. If you did some research, you would be better informed about the lack of evidence supporting gender-affirmation for minors. Because you refuse to do any substantial research, one must conclude you don't care about the truth of what you say as long as it appears to be true because you can cite institutions backing it.
You can assert anything you like, but if you have no evidence or argument to back it up nobody sensible cares. Rejecting evidence because it contradicts a narrative that you think is progressive is no different from being a creationist and rejecting evidence that contradicts scripture.
Because you have done no reading. I don't need to find anything, I have done the reading. And I also posted evidence which you ignored.
Bryson is trans, by definition. On what grounds do you plan to exclude him from that group? And how is it fear mongering to talk about facts? Bryson is real, I didn't make him up.
You don't seem capable of grappling with the reality of these issues.
You do object to doing research.
You can assert anything you like...
..but if you have no evidence or argument to back it up nobody sensible cares.
Just for the sake of maintaining my Devil's Advocate reputation, I'm going to agree that these are obviously terms of derogation.What evidence do I need to assert that terms like "larping" and "cosplay" to describe trans-people are (at best) disrespectful and are hate-terms?
You do though. All the time. Speed limits are set to stop bad drivers killing people, but everyone has to obey them. Jeez, literally all laws are formulated to rein in the worst people, but everyone has to abide by them. Should we have no laws against robbery, or murder, because that's treating everyone as if they're a robber or a murderer?
I'm not asking about all members of a group. I'm asking specifically about Bryson. And you aren't answering.You don't treat all of any group of people as though they were the worst of that group.
Are you under the mistaken impression that we think there is nowhere they should be allowed to use the bathroom? Because that's not the case. Since we think there is indeed an appropriate place they can go, what's your point?We're not talking about robbing or murder. We're talking about going to the bathroom. Even people you deem weird need to go to the bathroom sometimes.
We're not talking about robbing or murder. We're talking about going to the bathroom. Even people you deem weird need to go to the bathroom sometimes.
Just for the sake of maintaining my Devil's Advocate reputation, I'm going to agree that these are obviously terms of derogation.
Are you under the mistaken impression that we think there is nowhere they should be allowed to use the bathroom? Because that's not the case. Since we think there is indeed an appropriate place they can go, what's your point?