• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

General UK politics VIII - The Last Tory

Starmer posts message at Easter to Christians in the UK.

Causes outrage among the Gammons and Reform.

Apparently suggesting Christians contributed and continue to contribute to the nation is his usual arrogant, slyly manipulative language designed to try to unseat and discount Christianity in favour of Islam, his real master.

It's also being served up over Easter by the fake King as well. It won't work, we know they both serve their masters in the WEF.

Or so I have gathered from the general tone of posts over the last couple of days.
 
Last edited:
I just happened to look up Reform on Companies House, and there have been some recent changes.

Reform Party UK Ltd was, until 18th February, controlled by Farage and Tice, with Farage having more than 50 but less than 75% of shares. It is now controlled by a new company, Reform 2025 Ltd, of which the only two officers are Farage and Muhammad Yusuf, with no-one specified as having control.
 
Yes, I made some posts about it when it happened as Nigel was touting the winding up of the old Reform company as keeping his promise to make the party democratic.
 
Andy_Ross said:
Starmer posts message at Easter to Christians in the UK.

Causes outrage among the Gammons and Reform.

Apparently suggesting Christians contributed and continue to contribute to the nation is his usual arrogant, slyly manipulative language designed to try to unseat and discount Christianity in favour of Islam, his real master.

It's also being served up over Easter by the fake King as well. It won't work, we know they both serve their masters in the WEF.

Or so I have gathered from the general tone of posts over the last couple of days.
Click to expand...
Who is stirring up this ◊◊◊◊? Online commenters? Has anyone checked if they are based in St Petersburg?
 
Andy_Ross said:
Yes, I made some posts about it when it happened as Nigel was touting the winding up of the old Reform company as keeping his promise to make the party democratic.
Click to expand...
I made a comment about it on FB, and a local Reform party apparatchik assured me it's "a registered political party, regulated by the Electoral Commission and structured as a company limited by guarantee, so owned collectively by its members, not by any one person."
 
zooterkin said:
I made a comment about it on FB, and a local Reform party apparatchik assured me it's "a registered political party, regulated by the Electoral Commission and structured as a company limited by guarantee, so owned collectively by its members, not by any one person."
Click to expand...
Not by any one person [but by the one-and-only loud-mouth frog-faced shyster it has always been.]
 
Patrick Christys on his GBNews show asking "Should you have kids if you can’t afford to feed them breakfast?"

Of course the consensus answer on the show and accompanying Tweitter thread is no, and everyone can afford to feed their kids, but would rather spend the money on fake nails, drugs, alcohol and vaping.
 
Andy_Ross said:
Patrick Christys on his GBNews show asking "Should you have kids if you can’t afford to feed them breakfast?"

Of course the consensus answer on the show and accompanying Tweitter thread is no, and everyone can afford to feed their kids, but would rather spend the money on fake nails, drugs, alcohol and vaping.
Click to expand...

And everyone can predict the state of the economy several years in advance.
 
Mashuna said:
And everyone can predict the state of the economy several years in advance.
Click to expand...


It's not my job to feed the kids of irresponsible and feckless parents etc.

When I was a kid everyone had breakfast and not one child had to rely on the state to feed them etc.
 
Andy_Ross said:
It's not my job to feed the kids of irresponsible and feckless parents etc.

When I was a kid everyone had breakfast and not one child had to rely on the state to feed them etc.
Click to expand...
My mum was head mistress of a primary school in West Auckland from 1980 onwards and would beg to disagree with the second paragraph.

Prior to that she was at a school in the dales and the situation was very different.
 
I assume the comments were a response to the trial program to provide breakfasts/childcare in schools, because obviously children who are properly fed learn better and the last thing the right wants is well educated future voters.
 
It's todays outrage, the government funded school breakfast clubs.

It's not their money etc.
 
Andy_Ross said:
It's todays outrage, the government funded school breakfast clubs.

It's not their money etc.
Click to expand...
Well it's probably not the complainers money because I assume they have well paid accountants making sure they don't pay taxes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom