Of course, but let's not draw other people's (or other peoples') lines for them,...is there a line after which we are just being needlessly uptight?
What's the argument aside from chronological snobbery?That fallacy relies on an approach being superior exclusively because it's new or modern.
Cultural evolution that has long left behind the idea of respectable women not being able to show their ankles in public? Broad trends that have for generations afforded women more freedom of presentation and liberal attitudes?What's the argument aside from chronological snobbery?
Chronological snobbery dressed up in the garb of cultural evolution can be seen for what it is in the changing room.Cultural evolution that has long left behind the idea of respectable women not being able to show their ankles in public?
Freedom of presentation implies the ability to decide to whom they present, along with where, when and how.Broad trends that have for generations afforded women more freedom of presentation and liberal attitudes?
Fair. But we are trying to work out where the broader societal lines should be, yeah? Some people's ideas may be found inconducive to societal goals.Of course, but let's not draw other people's (or other peoples') lines for them,
Ok. Do their personal decisions dictate societal accommodations? Cuz those same people seem.pretty adamant that the trans people don't have that privilege. One way street, maybe?Chronological snobbery dressed up in the garb of cultural evolution can be seen for what it is in the changing room.
Freedom of presentation implies the ability to decide to whom they present, along with where, when and how.
I'm not saying their concerns are totally unfounded. I'm saying that the recent "trans panic" is over the top and transphobia is the reason.You could make an argument that women's concerns are unfounded without taking the leap to "transphobe". But no, you presume the worst, casting differing opinions in the worst possible light. Highly unimpressive.
I for one am not at all interested in working out where the broader lines should be.Fair. But we are trying to work out where the broader societal lines should be, yeah? Some people's ideas may be found inconducive to societal goals.
Really? Because broadly, transwomen have a lot of open doors. All over my state, everywhere. Lia Thomas' women's swim records are proudly displayed at UPenn. And the courts of most states are falling in line in greater numbers: if gender equals sex, and you can't discriminate by gender or sex, than there are no sex segregated spaces.I for one am not at all interested in working out where the broader lines should be.
I think the broader lines are fine exactly where they are.
Look around. Dey dun been crossed.I'm trying to work out if there's any plausible reason why transwomen should be entitled to cross those lines.
it's necessary to clean this up right pronto, and codify sex segregated spaces and their limitations.You're trying to address that by suggesting women need to redraw their lines to better accommodate transwomen. Without having answered the actual question - is it necessary?
I'd love to say this makes less sense than any other post here, but...Tomorrow morning, 9.45 BST. Be there.
Readers have no way of knowing what you mean by "trans panic" is. So again, you're posting vague statements that can't be rebutted.I'm not saying their concerns are totally unfounded. I'm saying that the recent "trans panic" is over the top and transphobia is the reason.
There will never be the statistics Thermal seems to want. Nobody is going to be able to show that one in however many women going into a public toilet is sexually assaulted by a trans-identifying man. And if they could, the ratio would be so low as to be able to be mocked. All anyone can do is search press reports to find examples, and no number of examples will be enough for men determined never to see anything from a woman's perspective.
I don't want to have to rely on my ability to fight off a man. I don't want him there in the first place.
Here's the Dolatowski case to add to the collection.
![]()
Transgender woman, 18, sexually assaulted girl, 10, in Morrisons toilet
Katie Dolatowski was spared jail despite a similar attack weeks earlier.metro.co.uk
As a counter to that stupid mouse-ears picture the papers keep publishing, here's what Dolatowski actually looks like.
View attachment 60101
There has never been a picture of him without the hair all over his face (and often he has a mask on), but you get the idea. Look how he towers over the two female prison officers given the job of handling him.
Inconvenient facts that some of the TRAs here wish would go away.The average woman is much smaller and has less muscle than the average man.
This is a fact. A fact that includes men who dress as women.
Yes they do. They know very well. The popularity of this thread confirms it.Readers have no way of knowing what you mean by "trans panic" is. So again, you're posting vague statements that can't be rebutted.
I'd love to say this makes less sense than any other post here, but...

The popularity of this thread does not stem from "trans panic" (Yes they do. They know very well. The popularity of this thread confirms it.