• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Transwomen are not Women - Part 15

What's the argument aside from chronological snobbery?
Cultural evolution that has long left behind the idea of respectable women not being able to show their ankles in public? Broad trends that have for generations afforded women more freedom of presentation and liberal attitudes?
 
Cultural evolution that has long left behind the idea of respectable women not being able to show their ankles in public?
Chronological snobbery dressed up in the garb of cultural evolution can be seen for what it is in the changing room.
Broad trends that have for generations afforded women more freedom of presentation and liberal attitudes?
Freedom of presentation implies the ability to decide to whom they present, along with where, when and how.
 
Of course, but let's not draw other people's (or other peoples') lines for them,
Fair. But we are trying to work out where the broader societal lines should be, yeah? Some people's ideas may be found inconducive to societal goals.
 
Chronological snobbery dressed up in the garb of cultural evolution can be seen for what it is in the changing room.

Freedom of presentation implies the ability to decide to whom they present, along with where, when and how.
Ok. Do their personal decisions dictate societal accommodations? Cuz those same people seem.pretty adamant that the trans people don't have that privilege. One way street, maybe?
 
You could make an argument that women's concerns are unfounded without taking the leap to "transphobe". But no, you presume the worst, casting differing opinions in the worst possible light. Highly unimpressive.
I'm not saying their concerns are totally unfounded. I'm saying that the recent "trans panic" is over the top and transphobia is the reason.
 
Fair. But we are trying to work out where the broader societal lines should be, yeah? Some people's ideas may be found inconducive to societal goals.
I for one am not at all interested in working out where the broader lines should be.

I think the broader lines are fine exactly where they are.

I'm trying to work out if there's any plausible reason why transwomen should be entitled to cross those lines.

You're trying to address that by suggesting women need to redraw their lines to better accommodate transwomen. Without having answered the actual question - is it necessary?
 
I for one am not at all interested in working out where the broader lines should be.

I think the broader lines are fine exactly where they are.
Really? Because broadly, transwomen have a lot of open doors. All over my state, everywhere. Lia Thomas' women's swim records are proudly displayed at UPenn. And the courts of most states are falling in line in greater numbers: if gender equals sex, and you can't discriminate by gender or sex, than there are no sex segregated spaces.
I'm trying to work out if there's any plausible reason why transwomen should be entitled to cross those lines.
Look around. Dey dun been crossed.
You're trying to address that by suggesting women need to redraw their lines to better accommodate transwomen. Without having answered the actual question - is it necessary?
it's necessary to clean this up right pronto, and codify sex segregated spaces and their limitations.
 
I'm not saying their concerns are totally unfounded. I'm saying that the recent "trans panic" is over the top and transphobia is the reason.
Readers have no way of knowing what you mean by "trans panic" is. So again, you're posting vague statements that can't be rebutted.
 
There will never be the statistics Thermal seems to want. Nobody is going to be able to show that one in however many women going into a public toilet is sexually assaulted by a trans-identifying man. And if they could, the ratio would be so low as to be able to be mocked. All anyone can do is search press reports to find examples, and no number of examples will be enough for men determined never to see anything from a woman's perspective.

Applicable to @Thermal, @Mycroft, @acbytesla, and others. That has become clear over the last few weeks of their posting here. Its clear that they neither care, nor want to care.


I don't want to have to rely on my ability to fight off a man. I don't want him there in the first place.

Here's the Dolatowski case to add to the collection.


As a counter to that stupid mouse-ears picture the papers keep publishing, here's what Dolatowski actually looks like.

View attachment 60101

There has never been a picture of him without the hair all over his face (and often he has a mask on), but you get the idea. Look how he towers over the two female prison officers given the job of handling him.

Here is another example that points up the complete BS @Thermal is spouting - 'you'll just have to fight them off' is a complete BS argument - yes @Thermal, that is the argument you are making, whether you understand it or not. Pound-for-pound, men have more than 250% the punching power of women. My girls are both about 5'6" and 8½ to 9 stone. Neither of them would have had the proverbial snowball's chance in hell of fighting off this guy. One punch would have been enough to knock them from here to next Christmas.
 
Last edited:
Readers have no way of knowing what you mean by "trans panic" is. So again, you're posting vague statements that can't be rebutted.
Yes they do. They know very well. The popularity of this thread confirms it.
 
I'd love to say this makes less sense than any other post here, but...

There is a court judgement due tomorrow morning which is critical in this debate. It's happening in London, but it will have ramifications across the globe. Everyone who is up to speed on this issue, on either side, is counting the hours. Telling that you have no idea.





1744751754320.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Yes they do. They know very well. The popularity of this thread confirms it.
The popularity of this thread does not stem from "trans panic" ( (:rolleyes: whatever the hell that is supposed to mean)... it stems from the vile statements of a few TRA misogynists calling normal people "bigots" and "transphobes" for defending the rights of women.
 

Back
Top Bottom