Fonebone
persona non grata
Earthhquakes collapse buildings at near free-fall speed into footprints as their concrete turns to dust......
Atomized concrete dust
Atomized concrete dust
It was a concrete building. And concrete does indeed turn to dust when pulverised, not "atomised". Also, what does "near free-fall" have to do with anything?Earthhquakes collapse buildings at near free-fall speed into footprints as their concrete turns to dust......
Atomized concrete dust
It's only a theory.Have you heard of gravity?
Really, I thought it was speed, gravity accelerates you until the force from wind friction is equal to the force of gravity and you stop accelerating?Even that idiot Gage got it after a few years; it's free-fall acceleration, not free-fall speed.
That's terminal velocity, which by definition is not free fall because it includes an additional force, air resistance, to that from gravity; free fall is defined as motion subject only to gravitational force.Really, I thought it was speed, gravity accelerates you until the force from wind friction is equal to the force of gravity and you stop accelerating?
It proves that buildings fall into their own footprint all the time. See post #3....what does "near free-fall" have to do with anything?
I'm also confused. Doesn't it prove that even buildings which are not being professionally demolished can collapse straight down? Wasn't that one of the CT nutters beliefs, that the WTC was demolished?I'm not clear what significant thing we're expected to infer from a concrete building which falls down rather than, perhaps, toppling over like a felled tree.