Thermal
August Member
Brevity is indeed the key to clear communication. Years and tens of thousands of posts could have been replaced with the above.◊◊◊◊ them! ◊◊◊◊ every single one of them!
Brevity is indeed the key to clear communication. Years and tens of thousands of posts could have been replaced with the above.◊◊◊◊ them! ◊◊◊◊ every single one of them!
Seems to me an XY originated brain would kinda invariably produce an XY originated chemistry, whatever that specifically is?Wouldn't it need to be demonstrated first that males and females have different "brain chemistry"?
Because I don't think that's been conclusively shown. For example: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00677-x
And even if it was evidenced that men and women have gendered brains, and even if it was then shown that trans-identifying men have the "brain chemistry" of women, I'm not sure that would overcome any of the objections that people have expressed about men competing in women's sports, nor in single-sex spaces such as changing rooms or DV shelters.
I think a very important issue for the subject is the following: do trans women actually have the chemistry and brain of a woman? I'm sure there has been some research on this.
Follow up: if trans women actually do have the brain chemistry of a woman as opposed to a man, that would definitely change my thoughts on the issue.
One thing we do have some stats about is patterns of sexual offense in males versus patterns of sexual offense in females. You probably already figured out which pattern transwomen sexual offenders follow.Wouldn't it need to be demonstrated first that males and females have different "brain chemistry"?
Because I don't think that's been conclusively shown. For example: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00677-x
And even if it was evidenced that men and women have gendered brains, and even if it was then shown that trans-identifying men have the "brain chemistry" of women, I'm not sure that would overcome any of the objections that people have expressed about men competing in women's sports, nor in single-sex spaces such as changing rooms or DV shelters.
I didn't attribute anything to you.If you're going to add things I didn't say, then you're not worth engaging with. Please only attribute to me what I actually say.
This is false.And it’s just impossible to figure out who is faking it so all trans-people need to be treated as criminals.
And that's important to know when undergoing some medical treatment, or if you are planning to ◊◊◊◊. For the other 99.999% of human interaction, like simply going to the bathroom in a public facility, it doesn't make the slightest difference.
Good for you.I've gone my whole life with never a thought about men's dicks. Every guy I met could be a eunuch for all I know. Their Johnson means dead zero to me in how we interact or relate to each other. Everything significant about being a man (to me, anyway) has nothing to do with their cocks.
I think a very important issue for the subject is the following: do trans women actually have the chemistry and brain of a woman? I'm sure there has been some research on this.
Follow up: if trans women actually do have the brain chemistry of a woman as opposed to a man, that would definitely change my thoughts on the issue.
Seems to me an XY originated brain would kinda invariably produce an XY originated chemistry, whatever that specifically is?
Ya I think you may have fallen behind in the discussion a bit.Obviously it doesn't to you, so you take it upon yourself to decree that it doesn't make the slightest difference to anyone else either. News flash. It makes a great deal of difference to many women, for reasons that have been enumerated in this thread multiple times. It also seems to make a fair bit of difference to a fair number of men, who are embarrassed by the presence of the opposite sex in their intimate spaces.
Then we have changing facilities, showers, sleeping accommodation, sports...
I can't tell you how much I loathe males declaring what females should have to tolerate, with no consideration for female's views at all.I have a good compromise on a lot of these issues. Only men who have undergone reconstructive surgery to remove their testicles and penis, and hormone therapy to remove facial hair and grow boobs, aka transsexuals, should be allowed in women's bathrooms and locker rooms. But they cannot compete in women's sports because they still have the muscle and skeletal structure of a man.
If you still have a penis and testicles you do not belong in the women's locker room or shower or bathroom.
Ya I think you may have fallen behind in the discussion a bit.
In the US state I live, we have every legal access for transpeople imaginable, right down to high school locker room showers, which I thought would be a line never to be crossed. Apparently we crossed that Rubicon many years ago, and... nothing happened.
I had asked my wife about transwomen in rest rooms, and she said you see one once in a while, but who cares? A friend of hers goes to a gym called Planet Fitness, where there are a couple transwomen regularly in the locker room. Nothing happens.
And if you get tempted to whine about anecdotal evidence, you might recall that's all the tweets you post amount to.
All y'all's tranny freak sexual fantasies aren't happening. People seem to be far better than you imagine, and can conduct themselves normally.
They're still male to the females who interact with them. In almost every case.Because for all intents and purposes, they are no longer male to the women around them who feel threatened by a shlong in their face when they are getting undressed.
I do, but that was not what I was talking about. We had some male posters swooning about cock kind of unrelated to female threats. So there's that.Good for you.
Do you understand that the dynamic is NOT the same when the interaction is between males and females? Like, every interaction I have with other females has nothing at all to do with their breasts, butts, or vulvas... but that's not true for interactions the average male has with females.
I don't. I am paraphrasing literally every female I am close enough to talk about this with, including my kids and wife and her friends and our families.They're still male to the females who interact with them. In almost every case.
Please don't take it upon yourself to mansplain what females perceive.
Stop playing silly games by feigning ignorance
- YOU said those things
- I called you out for it
- YOU posted a link to back up YOUR claim
- I asked you show me where in the link it supports the things YOU claimed
Only if you cling to the convenient but simplistic idea that this is all about the Y chromosome. It isn't. It's about the SRY gene, which WOMEN with Swyer's syndrome don't have (at least in a functional form).
Argue about CAIS if you like but Swyer's isn't open for debate.
Mind tossing in a few nouns and verbs to clarify what the hell you are talking about?You think nothing happens We could start with self-exclusion.
You just declare it's not part of the debate. I disagree.
It shows biology is more complex than men are men and women are women.