No, It's "I'm fed up providing the statistics for trans-identifying male sexual offending, the thousand or so examples of these cases, and the psychology/psychiatry references that explain autogynaephilia," only to have everything dismissed as "you can't keep trans-identifying men from having everything they want just because of a few bad apples." As I remarked before, no matter how high the proportion of bad apples in the barrel, you'll insist that all of them must be treated with deference and grovelling, all of them must have free right of access to women's spaces, just because there might be one in a small village in Wales somewhere who isn't a pervert who gets off on listening to women pee.
Lies. Not sure what you are trying to say, unless you are arguing against an imaginary poster coincidentally also named Thermal, who has radically different postings.
You have no idea what these men are really like.
You know literally nothing about me or my experiences.
You have completely swallowed the propaganda about the poor harmless troubled soul who only wants to have everything women have and not be bothered by anyone about it.
I have not. Had you been paying the slightest bit of attention, which you seem to indicate you have not, we have the same stance on intimate space access and participation in competitive athletics. From my personal experience, I do know that you are globally and factually wrong, and trans people do exist who are not 'tranny freaks'.
The most oppressed and marginalised group on the planet, that has governments and organisations and corporations dancing attendance on it by draping everything in the Progress Pride flag (forced teaming is working well there), abolishing all female single-sex spaces and getting women who speak out of line cancelled and sacked. You have no interest in looking any deeper into this issue in case it shakes your male-centred prejudice, and you'll dismiss any evidence handed to you as flawed in some way or another. Sick of this.
So sick of it that here you are, and still not providing substantial evidence of your assertions, yet expecting everyone to defer to your bald claims. Oh, but wait! is this the long awaited evidence coming up? Let's see...
ETA: Here's an article, though I don't imagine you'll read it.
Some men have a sexual fetish for pretending to be women.
www.spiked-online.com
A ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ fictional TV show? That's what you come up with? All right.
First off: saying I wouldn't read it indicates you are not an observant person. I have read, explored, and critiqued everything presented during my involvement ITT. Remember when you recently posted a tweet featuring the nitwit trying to interpret an unnamed study? Remember how I not only identified the study, but linked it and posted a factual critique? Remember how you showed all the acumen of a rock while this was being discussed?
But back to the ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ TV show. It is a fictional account of a seriously sexually deviant guy. Not exactly a typical trans gender cat. It throws an interesting spotlight on how weird peoples' fetishes can be, sure. But that's irrelevant to the discussion here, because you present ZERO evidence that this is representative.
Hey, you know what else is on TV? A series called
Dexter. Realistic in it's way, because real serial killers are most often white males. How much more do you think we can extrapolate from the TV show's writers that we should treat as representative and factual?
This is what I have seen of your argumentation. Unsupported claims with a demand they be accepted, random tweets from painfully stupid people, and now fictional TV show reviews, which I guess are supposed to be the end-all of discussion, when all I asked of you is if you had any evidence to support your zany claims that dem trannys is all pervs.