Nope.
It's not obvious why the general principles you laid out would only apply only in one special case, and I was questioning those.
That's fine, but it's not exactly grounds to say someone else is wrong for making it, especially if they are more personally affected.
Well, there are a lot of things going on there with the traditional status beyond mere discrimination. You've got the whole body shame thing that comes from being constantly clothed, for one. Would it be better if we weren't? I certainly think so... body shame is learned. But the anxiety it can cause clearly isn't worth it for most. Yes, I'm sort of a nudist (not exclusively, mind you).
Don't overlook the class angle to this. "Women" are not a homogenous group, and the interests of upper class women often align more with the interests of upper class men than the interests of lower class women. And it's primarily lower class women, not upper class women, who are vulnerable to the predations of males entering their spaces.
Who exactly is "they"?
It may not have been in that particular segment, but I'm pretty sure I made it clear that it'd be the generation making all the noise about it on both sides. And they won't agree. They never do. They'll just come up with a way to live with each other. Some of them will probably end up married with each other and still disagree about such things as what's appropriate in which circumstance.
Keeping males out of female spaces is neither prosecuting nor socially repressing them.
First, starting with men is PRECISELY what we're doing. Keep males out of female spaces. It's a very simple rule, and pretty effective.
Just more guilt by association. Did you really think I'd be impressed? Don't you think it's quite the stretch to compare me to a eugenics supporter?
◊◊◊◊ that. First, young people are stupid and ignorant, they are no better equipped to figure this out. Second, whatever rules they come up with won't just affect them. Older people get affected too, so there is absolutely no reason to exclude them from decision making.
Amusing choice of metaphors. People around here typically don't merely fail to lock their cars... they usually leave their keys in them. Same people who absolutely insist that they need firearms for their own safety, weirdly enough.
He didn't do that, and you missed the point entirely, which has NOTHING to do with eugenics.
But that's just it. They won't listen, anyway. We never did, and neither will their own children. This just isn't the sort of thing that the old people get to decide.
www.bbc.co.uk
That approach may work where you're from, but it doesn't scale. Likewise, allowing males into female spaces might work in some small tight-knit communities, but it doesn't scale.
In order to address the Chesterton's fence problem in this specific case, one ought to be able to articulate why the general rule "Keep males out of female spaces" arose in the first place and then explain why those reasons no longer obtain now that the "generation making all the noise" is old enough to wield political power.