Transwomen are not Women - Part 15

What evidence persuaded you that the average military member with gender dysphoria supports the "paedophile agenda" in their spare time?

What was it about my post that suggested this interpretation to you? Where I come from we have a saying. If ye flee wi the craws ye'll get shot with the craws.

And you probably know what I think about this entire "gender dysphoria" malarkey by now anyway.
 
...sorry, what was that?
George Orwell, talking about the pacifist movement in the context of World War 2. The truth of his aphorism should be self-evident.

Similarly, the Trans Rights movement hosts a misogynist, pedophilic agenda, attached like a parasite. One of those creepy mind controlling parasites.

People riding the wave of pro trans activism into military service entitlements must sooner or later confront this parasite, or else be complicit in its perversion of their cause.

Fiat self-ID should never have been considered, let alone normalized.
 
George Orwell, talking about the pacifist movement in the context of World War 2. The truth of his aphorism should be self-evident.
In his context, it may have been applicable (IIRC, he was saying that during actual, open World War against fascists, you didn't have the luxury of pacifism).

{Eta: you were for or against, no middle ground. I think you can be pacifist without being pro-fascist, not fighting but resisting the fascists in your own way}

In any event, I'd argue that in non-WW2 today, the reasonable spectrum of pacifism is broader.
Similarly, the Trans Rights movement hosts a misogynist, pedophilic agenda, attached like a parasite. One of those creepy mind controlling parasites.
Some...faction or something of it might be... 'pro-pedophile', but I really don't get that message across the board. Or anywhere. Maybe there is some freak spouting it (big world, I'm sure there's one or two), but can you honestly apply that to military personnel with GD with such abandon? Do you nod in agreement when horrifically vile traits are pinned on you, claiming its part of the conservative agenda?
People riding the wave of pro trans activism into military service entitlements must sooner or later confront this parasite, or else be complicit in its perversion of their cause.

Fiat self-ID should never have been considered, let alone normalized.
Agreed on the last sentence. Not so sure about the preceeding.
 
Last edited:
Dunno where you were back when trans rights became a cause célèbre in bascially all progressive spaces and activist groups, but it really did happen a while back.
He didn’t know who Lia Thomas is either. He’s not actually paying any attention. Which isn’t a problem in and of itself, I’m very much of the opinion that people shouldn’t be compelled to pay attention to what other people care about. But it is a problem when he projects his ignorance onto others as if it were indicative of reality.
 
He didn’t know who Lia Thomas is either. He’s not actually paying any attention. Which isn’t a problem in and of itself, I’m very much of the opinion that people shouldn’t be compelled to pay attention to what other people care about. But it is a problem when he projects his ignorance onto others as if it were indicative of reality.
He's paying attention alright. He's just in the bargaining stage. He still thinks that writing off sports entire will extricate him from the conundrum in which he finds himself.
 
What led to policies like this was the new Administration's position that trans identity is a symptom of gender dysphoria, and that gender dysphoria is a mental health condition incompatible with military service.
Unlike, say, PTSD.
What was it about my post that suggested this interpretation to you?
The part where you painted LGBT with the paedo brush.
 
Burn the lot of them.



The article below is free to read this weekend. The convicted paedophile is the man who founded LGBT Youth Scotland. He was convicted in 2010. The organisation still exists, is still lavishly funded by the Scottish government, and is still pushing trans ideology on children.

Three despicable people who should get serious time in prison.

I don’t understand the connection with transgender though as none of the paedophiles are trans.

So who is to be burned?
 
Dunno where you were back when trans rights became a cause célèbre in bascially all progressive spaces and activist groups, but it really did happen a while back.

Well, "the left" does have quite a few lunatic fringes. They're not "Democrats" as a whole, though. Actual Democratic Party politicians have been mostly silent on the matter.
 
Last edited:
Well, "the left" does have quite a few lunatic fringes. They're not "Democrats" as a whole, though. Actual Democratic Party politicians have been mostly silent on the matter.
Silent? A lot of them. But they still vote for that crap. Democrat voters aren't really on board with the radical trans stuff, but for the most part the politicians have gone along with it. Which is one of the many reasons they got their asses handed to them in the last election.
 
He's paying attention alright. He's just in the bargaining stage. He still thinks that writing off sports entire will extricate him from the conundrum in which he finds himself.
Meanwhile, self-ID TIMs are, in some places, getting access to women's toilets and changing rooms, rape crisis centres, and domestic violence shelters. I guess Manoplus doesn't care about that either.
 
Silent? A lot of them. But they still vote for that crap. Democrat voters aren't really on board with the radical trans stuff, but for the most part the politicians have gone along with it. Which is one of the many reasons they got their asses handed to them in the last election.
True, unfortunately. Democrats can sometimes be their own worst enemies.
 

Back
Top Bottom