• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Trump's Second Term

Yesterday, US President Donald Trump posted a lengthy attack on Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky.

The White House quickly confirmed the tirade was in direct response to Zelensky saying that Trump lives in a “disinformation space”, which in turn, was in response to earlier claims from Trump about Zelensky's presidency and how the war began.

 
Well lookeethat, the Cato institute is apologising for dictatorship. That's about as surprising as serving boiled spuds with bacon and cabbage.
From your link:
And this is a pattern. The Trump White House puts out one executive order after another and launches one management initiative after another that might make sense had it just won a landmark Supreme Court case uprooting old law, except that it hasn’t won those cases—it simply hopes to in the future. It’s speculating on wins in cases still unargued, carving nuggets from chickens still unhatched.

Thus, multiple spending-freeze moves seem based on the idea that the courts have already struck down the Impoundment Control Act as infringing on inherent executive power. (They haven’t.) Purges of employees at federal agencies, sometimes baldly based on inferred political loyalty, seem based on the idea that courts will nullify civil service rules and the Elrod v. Burns line of First Amendment cases (shielding some public employees from dismissal for partisan reasons on the same rationale. (They haven’t done those things, either.)

What happens if not all these cases go their way and the court doesn’t agree to strike down a long list of constraints on the executive, some, as with civil service, of considerable historic provenance? Then the events of recent weeks will look very much like a lawbreaking spree.
No ◊◊◊◊, Sherlock!
 
Do you want to fight this war to the last Ukrainian, or do you want the war to end soon?

If you want it to end soon, then there are in principle three ways to do that. 1) Ukrainian defeat, 2) Russian defeat, and 3) a negotiated settlement. 1) is undesirable and unlikely given western aid. 2) is impossible to achieve, because it would require direct involvement of western militaries, and we don't want to do that for rather understandable reasons. So we're left with 3) a negotiated settlement.

And to get a negotiated settlement from Russia, you need to offer them something. What they really want is a Ukraine that has to bend to their will, like Belarus does. The specific amount of territory they hold isn't important, the territory is merely a tool to exert control over Ukraine. What Ukraine wants is security guarantees so that they don't have to bend to Moscow's will. NATO membership would do that, but the rules of membership basically already give Moscow a veto over that. And any other security guarantee is going to be directly counter to what Moscow wants.

Realistically, the only way to end this war soon is to offer Russia something else, something that would be valuable enough for them to give up their influence over Ukraine. And since we can't offer them the Baltic states in exchange, that something else is going to have to be money, in some form or other. That's all we can offer Russia, really.

So basically the options are we offer Russia money in some form (and trade is a pretty good form, since it doesn't come out of our budget), or just keep fighting. But Ukraine has already lost a lot of people. And they will keep losing people as long as this war continues. Ukrainian is already facing a demographic implosion, the longer this war drags on, the worse that implosion will get. The long-term survival of the country depends not only on its future international relations, but just having enough people to make a nation. It's easy to want to stick it to Russia when we aren't the ones dying to do it, but as long as we aren't, this war won't end in what looks like a victory for Ukraine. That's the harsh reality of the situation, and it does no one any favors to pretend otherwise. Now, details matter, and the details haven't been determined. So maybe whatever deal we end up with won't be good, or won't work, or won't be agreed to by both sides. But the fact that we're trying to reach a deal isn't a bad thing in and of itself. And that includes the fact that part of the deal is inevitably going to look like a reward to Russia. Because it has to, in order to get them to give up on keeping Ukraine under their thumb.

Imagine writing this in 1940 about Germany...
 
The loyalty Trump has to Putin is, IMO, a product of shared association over a long time, not a cold calculation or coercion. Russia got its hooks into Trump early, and has kept up contacts ever since; Russian money has kept Trump afloat in critical times, and people sent to him by Putin (Manaford, etc.) have proven to be loyal, even to their own detriment.
Also, Putin hates the same people as Trump: Clinton and Obama, and those snooty Europeans.
Trump is fantasizing that they are kindred spirits.
Likely so. That Putin fairly certainly also has blackmail on Trump, though, is pretty much a given. A lot of potential blackmail would likely be more embarrassing than anything that would matter much, of course, but there are possibilities for things that even MAGA might be less likely to accept (should they believe it). Stuff like recordings of Trump effectively agreeing to betray America, Trump accepting Russian efforts to involve himself in pedophilia (possibly with an Ivanka lookalike as a hook), and so on.
 
CNN reported, "But the list of contracts, published to a DOGE website Monday night, raises questions about the accuracy of that tally. The website appears to have used erroneous federal data to claim that DOGE saved taxpayers $8 billion by canceling a single US Immigration and Customs Enforcement contract that was actually worth a maximum of $8 million."

There are more general problems. As noted in both stories, blanket purchase agreements list a maximum dollar amount, not what was spent. NPR reported, ""There's no doubt that these young people [Musk] has working for him are very intelligent coders, genius coders, but they're limited," retired senior contracting officer Christopher Byrne said, referring to DOGE team members who have apparently been identifying cuts across government agencies. "They don't understand the processes, they don't understand how things work, they don't understand contracts, they don't understand grants," Byrne said."
 
Likely so. That Putin fairly certainly also has blackmail on Trump, though, is pretty much a given. A lot of potential blackmail would likely be more embarrassing than anything that would matter much, of course, but there are possibilities for things that even MAGA might be less likely to accept (should they believe it). Stuff like recordings of Trump effectively agreeing to betray America, Trump accepting Russian efforts to involve himself in pedophilia (possibly with an Ivanka lookalike as a hook), and so on.
I honestly don't think they would care about him betraying America because they think America has betrayed them and Trump is trying to fix it.

They're also probably not that bothered about paedophilia either as long as it was with someone who looked like a teenager. Gaetz hasn't drawn criticism for example.
 
They never gave a ◊◊◊◊ about sexual child abuse. Or a child's welfare.
All they want is to be assured that others are worse than they fear they are themselves, so they don't have to clean up their act before everyone else has been cleared out of the country.
 
I really don't think the stuff about Trump being afraid of, or beholden to, Putin are relevant here.

He's punishing Ukraine because he's a pathological narcissist who never forgets a slight, so they have to suffer defeat for failing to dish the dirt on the Bidens as he wanted, and he's going to make Russia pay hundreds of billions to let them win (payment in kind, in the form of mineral rights in conquered Ukraine).
 
It could be all of that - and much simpler.
Trump wants to end the war in Ukraine, especially now when he realizes that the fighting around Israel will never stop.
And the quickest way is stop helping Ukraine and give Russia all the Intel on how to crush it.
 
Rand Paul is amazed by Donald's Cabinet!

Also Ukrainian Warmongers!

Rand Paul
@RandPaul
A few people may have noticed that I resisted an enthusiastic endorsement of Donald Trump during the election.
But now, I’m amazed by the Trump cabinet (many of whom I would have picked).

I love his message to the Ukrainian warmongers, and along with his DOGE initiative shows I was wrong to withhold my endorsement.
So today, admittedly a little tardy, I give Donald Trump my enthusiastic endorsement!
(Too little too late some will say, but, you know, it is sincere, there is that.)

Don’t expect this endorsement to be fawning.
I still think tariffs are a terrible idea, but Dios Mio, what courage, what tenacity.

Go @realDonaldTrump Go!
 
Sorry, but I disagree.

Unfortunately, I have a few years of experience with unemployment, and being dismissed for cause does not automatically mean they'll be denied unemployment benefits.


-
Yes, most unemployment offices will give the former workers a chance to appeal the firing. Given DOGE is sloppy, corrupt, and incompetent they won't have much in the evidence department.

UO: OK, you say employee X was fired for cause "Not good at their job...". OK they have appealed that claim so you need to support that. Can you please list the incidents demonstrating their lack of skills at their job?

DOGE: List the what now?

UO: Appeal approved.
 
Yes, most unemployment offices will give the former workers a chance to appeal the firing. Given DOGE is sloppy, corrupt, and incompetent they won't have much in the evidence department.

UO: OK, you say employee X was fired for cause "Not good at their job...". OK they have appealed that claim so you need to support that. Can you please list the incidents demonstrating their lack of skills at their job?

DOGE: List the what now?

UO: Appeal approved.
Let's hope. I can picture an alternate exchange in the not too far future:

Musk-hired teenager manning UO phone: 'Can you please list the incidents demons--'
Surly teen girl manning DOGE phone, between sips of energy drink: 'Thoughtcrime.'
UO: 'Berufsverbot.'
 
Soon, we won't need to stop drugs at the borders!


And it worked so well under Reagan!


We have no drugs in Britain at all thanks to Zammo Maguire.
 

Back
Top Bottom