• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed The Fascism Checklist, Trump 2025


Latest episode of Ezra Kleins interviews a women who wrote a book, Origins of Elected Strongmen.
Far better way to look at trump than just calling fascist.

ETA: Very short version, its all about transactional politics, personal ego, and loyalty to the leader rather than any sort of ideological program of note.
Umm, you just described Fascism. And the ultimate submission to the big man is the defining characteristic.
 
Lets not forget that for the average German citizen in the 1930's not much of their daily life changed under Hitler.
As long as you were not a Jew, a known Communist or critic of the regime things went along as normal.
The police still treated you normally, there was more order in the streets (as the Nazis stopped picking fights), inflation lessened (due to other factors, but Hitler eagerly accepted responsibility) and Germany was being made Great Again, especially with the return of the Reinland and the Anschluss.
It's shocking to me to see the playbook of the Nazi powergrab being almost copied one on one in the US and how little there were actual protections of democratic institutions. Just replace Jew with Immigrant and Communist with DEI/Woke.

It was only once those institutions had been replaced with hardcore loyalists, as is happening in the US now, that people learned that suddenly their rights ment nothing the moment they got accused of being the wrong group.

One counter argument I've seen Trump voters give is 'but no rights have vanished'. No. Not yet. But the instutions that protect those rights are rapidly being transformed into a toothless yes machine or removed, and once they are gone it will be too late.
Well said.
 
Installed a Russian asset as head of intelligence. How are the Nazi apologists going to excuse this?

What is your evidence that Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian asset?
I guess that's one way, to ignore all of the reports of her extensive ties to Russia, her history of being a Russian apologist and to instead to keep asking for increasingly specific evidence.
 
Would you agree that her position requires extreme scrutiny and not overwhelming evidence?

I guess that's one way, to ignore all of the reports of her extensive ties to Russia, her history of being a Russian apologist and to instead to keep asking for increasingly specific evidence.
I was hoping for a brief list instead of "do your own research." Gabbard has not been covered as extensively in Canadian media as Trump, Musk, or RFK Jr, so I honestly have no idea what she's been saying or doing over the last decade.
 

Tulsi Gabbard’s history with Russia is even more concerning than you think​

In almost every foreign conflict in which Russia had a hand, Gabbard backed Moscow and railed against the US. Her past promotion of Kremlin propaganda has provoked significant opposition on both sides of the aisle to her nomination.

Her journey from anti-war Democrat to Moscow-friendly Maga warrior began in Syria. The devastating conflict was sparked by pro-democracy uprisings in 2011, which were brutally crushed by the Assad regime. It descended into a complex web of factions that drew extremist Islamists from around the world and global powers into the fray.
 

Tulsi Gabbard, President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to lead the U.S. intelligence services, in 2022 endorsed one of Russia’s main justifications for invading Ukraine: the existence of dozens of U.S.-funded biolabs working on some of the world’s nastiest pathogens.

Moscow claimed Ukraine was using the labs to create deadly bioweapons similar to COVID-19 that could be used against Russia, and that Russian President Vladimir Putin had no choice but to invade neighboring Ukraine to protect his country.

In fact, the labs are public and part of an international effort to control outbreaks and stop bioweapons.

Gabbard, a military veteran and a former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii, later said she wasn’t accusing the United States or Ukraine of anything nefarious and was just voicing concerns about protecting the labs.

But to critics in the U.S., including lawmakers in both parties, the comments showed a disturbing willingness to parrot Russian propaganda — a tendency that has earned Gabbard praise on Russian state TV.

...

Gabbard says American assistance for Ukraine jeopardizes global security by antagonizing Russia. She has criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as corrupt and has expressed sympathy for Russia’s position, given Ukraine’s desire to join NATO, the Western military alliance.

“This war and suffering could have easily been avoided if Biden Admin/NATO had simply acknowledged Russia’s legitimate security concerns,” she posted on Twitter at the start of Russia’s invasion in 2022.

...

Gabbard also has defended Trump’s relationship with autocrats such as Putin, saying it shows Trump has “the courage to meet with adversaries, dictators, allies and partners alike in the pursuit of peace, seeing war as a last resort.”

Gabbard’s own meetings with Syrian President Bashar Assad in 2017 angered many of her then-fellow Democrats. They said her visit helped legitimize a leader accused of war crimes and who has served as a proxy and host for Russia and Iran in the Middle East.

...

Gabbard’s remarks about Russia haven’t gone unnoticed in Moscow, where state-run media have praised her and even jokingly referred to her as a Russian agent.

An article published Friday in RIA Novosti, a major Russian state-controlled news agency, called Gabbard “superwoman” and noted her past appearances on Russian TV, claiming that Ukrainian intelligence views her as “probably an agent of the Russian special services.”

Source: The Associated Press, a respected and high-credibility news organisation that was recently barred from the White House because they wouldn't change their editorial standards according to Trump's whim.
 




Source: The Associated Press, a respected and high-credibility news organisation that was recently barred from the White House because they wouldn't change their editorial standards according to Trump's whim.
Thanks! This is exactly the information I was looking for.
 
Reading a little further in the above link, we see the T folks opposing the idea of Ukraine joining NATO. I wonder if they have considered the effect of leavung NATO as they have occasionally threatened, on their power to prevent it.

Vance speaking on the core values of democracy sure pins the irony meter.
 
Absolutely NOT Trump writing that. Not his style at all. Also, he isn't "saving" any country. He is destroying not just his own but a number of others too.

I await the rapid onset of the Fuhrerbunker denouement.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom