Thermal
August Member
You have got to be ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ kidding me.I do not accept pseudoskepticism! Have some intellectual humility!
You have got to be ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ kidding me.I do not accept pseudoskepticism! Have some intellectual humility!
Hilarious given the rampant intellectual cowardice you are displaying.I do not accept pseudoskepticism! Have some intellectual humility!
Making up excuses for not needing to answer challenges to your claims is childish. You're the one being arrogant.I do not accept pseudoskepticism! Have some intellectual humility!
Very funny: you would never be able to distinguish between the two, and you have never engaged in an honest debate with any of the skeptics here. So much for intellectual humility.I do not accept pseudoskepticism! Have some intellectual humility!
If you believe this, then what the hell have we been arguing about?If you believe in spirits, you are rejecting science and promoting primitive ideas
Which has been your position for dozens of pages.If you believe in spirits, you are rejecting science and promoting primitive ideas
I can't tell if you're stating this as something you agree with or if it's just something your AI spat out.Believing in spirits is like believing in stories of witches or monsters, it is a remnant of the past that science has already overcome.
No, that's not how science works. For forty pages you've demanded that your belief in spirits be given some sort of objective credence. I assume this latest spam flood in the opposite direction is just your latest plea for attention.I don't need to examine the evidence; I already know that spirits don't exist because science says they don't
Asked and answered. People are not being antagonistic to you because they fear they might be wrong. They're being antagonistic to you because you're acting like a jerk.the possibility that their materialistic view of reality may be incomplete or wrong can be disturbing to pseudoskeptics this fear may manifest as anger or hostility