It does here. Mere belief in something does not make it true. @Calderaro is trying to substitute cultural norms for factual truth.
That has nothing to do with what was claimed, and matter is not "congealed" energy.
confirmation bias! By setting impossible criteria, the pseudoskeptic ensures that no evidence will be accepted, regardless of its quality
Nope, believers ensure that no evidence is accepted by only submitting very poor quality evidence.
My goal is not to "win" the debate, but to explore the topic honestly and constructively.
Not compatible with your observed behaviour, for example here posting something that isn't relevant to the post you were replying to.
Then why do you refuse to do so?
Pseudoskeptics use the Sagan Standard dogmatically, demanding unrealistically high standards of proof to reject claims that challenge their beliefs, without considering the available evidence fairly.
why i don't know the english language!
You keep saying this. It remains untrue.
Then how in the ever loving hell are you expecting to "explore" a topic "constructively" with an English speaking forum?
That statement is not consistent with your behavior. You simply repeat the same claims over and over again. You ignore the discussion that ensues. None of that is compatible with honesty and practicality.
No. You have not been treated dogmatically here. You have been invited to supply evidence to meet an ordinary standard of proof.
Then you should stop annoying English-speakers at this forum who are trying to engage you fairly and honestly. If you cannot find a way to communicate effectively in English, then you should seek out skeptics who are fluent in your language.
Please present it, then.
No one has set "impossible criteria", they have just asked for evidence!
Then provide some evidence spirits exist. If they do, then this shouldn't be difficult!
