• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged The razor of Hitchens and the Spirits!

I'll repeat what I said before: any evidence, as opposed to claims, discredited books, AI generated word salad, copy pasta'd word salad and the like would be a very good start.

On you go then.
 
Last edited:
Calderaro said:
What makes this claim extraordinary? And what would be the standard of evidence that you consider appropriate?
Click to expand...
I asked you if you think it is “extraordinary” to demand that any evidence you bring should not be easily produced by fraud or based on “feelings”.

Frankly, I think it is not out of the ordinary to demand that evidence is not fraudulent, or just what you “feel”, but you might find it too much to ask? What do you say?
 
steenkh said:
Frankly, I think it is not out of the ordinary to demand that evidence is not fraudulent, or just what you “feel”, but you might find it too much to ask? What do you say?
Click to expand...
The burden of proof is up to those who make the statement, but it does not need to be unrealistic
 
I take it that you agree with most here that we are not demanding anything extraordinary when we ask for evidence that is not easily brushed aside?
 
"...and then...no, stop laughing, I'm serious here...MarkCorrigan says 'Where? Point to it'... no, stop laughing, seriously..."
 
The guy whose "research" has critical methodological flaws that renders it worthless? Really?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom