Yeah, agreed- I've seen too many examples of CTists using their mad photo-interpretation skilz in, say, the Boston Marathon Bombing threads ("it's suspicious that that guy is just standing there and not reacting to the mayhem around him!"- as if a photo could show anything more than him standing there), to think this one is actually evidence of anything. It was just too funny to resist.
Nothing says "Fight!" more than standing around staring at your phone.
Yeah, when has the ability to communicate ever helped a protest movement?
Yes, you can plainly see how well coordinated that protest is from the picture. Energetic, too.
Didn't we just cover the whole business of over-interpreting photographs with the wide-eyed lady in the other thread? This urge to score cheap points just makes people look silly.
No. That was someone else. Kinda' like you, though, implying that those "protestors" staring at their phones were reading tactical communications.
That's a vast system. Amazing how Musk can so quickly determine that the millions of transactions per day that go through it are fraudulent. He really must be some kind of Galaxy Brain. Or he said the quiet part loud.
You dismissed the possibility that phones could be useful. I merely corrected you on that matter. I made no implication at all as to what was occuring in the photos, as --scroll up-- we've already had a reminder of how foolish one would have to be to make assumptions of activity based on still photos which do not contain enough information.
FYI there are 34 other photos if you click on the link. It's Imgur, which is known safe.
You literally just made that up.
Very obvious.
You know what isn't skeptical? Drawing conclusions from a series of photographs lacking context.
