People keep saying this, but they never point to specific spending which will cost lives. I'm putting this argument in the "to be shown" category.
And I'm not so sure about reputational damage either. Do you really think Guatemala is going to resent us because we stopped funding LGBTQ+ activism in their country? Or might it be possible that they might consider that a positive step that we aren't pushing our crap on them?
And lastly, as far as there being a more responsible way to do this, maybe. And yet, nobody actually did it before. Nobody actually held USAID accountable for their spending. If the choice is between doing it "irresponsibly" and not doing it at all, then I'll choose doing it "irresponsibly." Because nobody else (both Democrat and Republican) actually offered to do it "responsibly".
Complaining that the bandaid is coming off too fast isn't an argument to keep it on.