• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed Does anyone here believe that Princess Diana's car crash was suspicious?

Eta: and did you hear what you just asked? "Why don't you believe <whatever> if it suits and reinforces your preconceived position?"

That's confirmation bias. And it's profoundly dishonest and anti-intellectual. Or in a phrase, it's the hallmark of a dumb-ass liar.
This. A skeptic should be concerned with what is the actual truth, not what would I prefer to believe or what would give me "ammunition".
 
Okay, last year my ex-wife died suddenly and mysteriously. She was 44, fit and active. That was in June.
In July an ex-girlfriend of mine died also. Also mid-forties and seemingly healthy.
In October of the same year my ex-mother-in-law died.
How ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ powerful I must be!

Note: I dearly loved my ex-wife and her mom. After we split up I still went to Thanksgiving and Christmas dinners with them.
I’m not powerful at all, or I wouldn’t have spent the last eight months crying at weird times.

ETA: one guy died in a motorcycle accident?
I ride; every year someone I know dies in a motorcycle accident.
It’s depressingly common
 
Last edited:
I still think it is strange that Barry Manakee died in a road crash, Morton was the victim of a burglary, the other guy was wiretapped, a different guy was sent to Iraq and then dismissed from the Army altogether, Diana herself was wiretapped and then Dodi and Diana died, too.

Not to mention the paparazzo dying later and the valet dying later.
Whether you think it strange or not has absolutely no relevance to the facts of the case. This is the Argument from Personal Incredulity again.
 
Imagine if the cops operated this way.

Imagine Charles wasn't king. Imagine his ex-wife died in a car crash and left behind a note saying "He's going to kill me in a car crash."

Imagine the cops saying "Nah, you think we should investigate this? Nah, you are just jumping to conclusions!"
 
Wouldn't that bolster my theory, if anything?

Camilla and Charles had an on-again-off-again relationship.

Perhaps when it was "on again", Andrew was conveniently sent off.
If he hadn't been sent away, that bolsters the conspiracy. He was sent away, and that too bolsters the conspiracy. Funny how that works.
 
Imagine if the cops operated this way.

Imagine Charles wasn't king. Imagine his ex-wife died in a car crash and left behind a note saying "He's going to kill me in a car crash."

Imagine the cops saying "Nah, you think we should investigate this? Nah, you are just jumping to conclusions!"
But they did investigate, didn't they? And what did they conclude from the evidence?
 
Imagine if the cops operated this way.

Imagine Charles wasn't king. Imagine his ex-wife died in a car crash and left behind a note saying "He's going to kill me in a car crash."

Imagine the cops saying "Nah, you think we should investigate this? Nah, you are just jumping to conclusions!"
Yes, just imagine the cops saying no investigation. That would be suspicious.
That's not what happened. Everything was carefully investigated. So, now what?
 
No one doubts he was sent to a different country to get him away from Diana.

They seriously doubt one thing: that Hewitt could be so stupid.

THAT'S the part that no one can believe!


Round about that time I went on a coach trip, leaving London after work on a Friday we travelled through France, Germany and Belgium with stops, and were back on Sunday evening for work the next day. The British Army had postings all over the world, if the posting was to get rid of him they could have posted him thousands of miles away with no civilian communication or transport links to the UK, not a budget weekend minibreak destination. You really don't have a clue what you're talking about and your insistence that your uninformed musings what 'must' be true trumps actual informed sources and the experience of people who lived through the period in the area is obnoxious and arrogant.
 
Imagine if the cops operated this way.

Imagine Charles wasn't king. Imagine his ex-wife died in a car crash and left behind a note saying "He's going to kill me in a car crash."

Imagine the cops saying "Nah, you think we should investigate this? Nah, you are just jumping to conclusions!"
Charles wasn't King when his ex-wife died in a car crash. The crash was investigated.
 
Wouldn't that bolster my theory, if anything?

Camilla and Charles had an on-again-off-again relationship.

Perhaps when it was "on again", Andrew was conveniently sent off.

Imagine if the cops operated this way.

Imagine Charles wasn't king. Imagine his ex-wife died in a car crash and left behind a note saying "He's going to kill me in a car crash."

Imagine the cops saying "Nah, you think we should investigate this? Nah, you are just jumping to conclusions!"

Well, of course they are going to say "all is well."

Government investigations are a joke. If you believe otherwise, you are 5 years old.

You would be infantile if you thought wrong-doing wasn't a thing.

Do you have any evidence that Diana was murdered?
 
I still think it is strange that Barry Manakee died in a road crash, Morton was the victim of a burglary, the other guy was wiretapped, a different guy was sent to Iraq and then
dismissed from the Army altogether, Diana herself was wiretapped and then Dodi and Diana died, too.

Not to mention the paparazzo dying later and the valet dying later.


More made up BS, Hewitt retired after serving 17 years and was granted the rank of Major in retirement.
 
Imagine if the cops operated this way.

Imagine Charles wasn't king. Imagine his ex-wife died in a car crash and left behind a note saying "He's going to kill me in a car crash."

Imagine the cops saying "Nah, you think we should investigate this? Nah, you are just jumping to conclusions!"
Why not cut to the chase and just imagine the whole conspiracy?
 

Back
Top Bottom