MarkCorrigan
Героям слава!
I have no idea what this means or which part of my post you think it's a response to.Can't see the body language myself.
I have no idea what this means or which part of my post you think it's a response to.Can't see the body language myself.
Those of us whose only knowledge of what Europe at the time was like is having been adults living in Europe at the time are lucky to have the benefit your insight to tell us what Europe was actually like at the time.
Again, it's so long ago now it's hard to remember that the reason France suddenly became the butt of innumerable American jokes, and the toe-curling term "freedom fries" was coined, was resentment that they had the audacity to suggest invading Iraq didn't sound like a brilliant idea. Seems so quaint now.And since France has been brought up...
Hey wait. Isn't that a bit sexist? Charles picked a naive young woman of eighteen to act as a brood mare, to do his life's career of producing an heir and a spare (preferably both male), whilst she apparently was under a romantic illusion of being in love and an old fashioned wife. Charles was consorting with people like Lord Mountbatten, Reverend Ball and Sir Jimmy Savile, all characters associated with paedophilia. Charles married soppy young Diana whilst all the time he was carrying on with a married RC woman married to someone else. I mean Camilla is probably a beard IMV and Charles has to be seen to be 'respectable' can't have young darling boys to-ing and fro-ing from his chambers. So if you are going to slut shame Diana, have a go at the person who drove an emotionally unstable young lady over the top in the first place.
Regarding "cameras were literally everywhere even in 1997" I rather think this is a failure to appreciate just how fast things have changed in recent years, and back when Diana died, video was analogue and if you wanted to record it you needed a video tape recorder, not a computer. I can remember discussion in this forum (probably on a 9/11 thread) about what a weird outlier London was because it had started sprouting cameras in the streets, like something out of communist China. And I didn't even join this forum until 2009, so that rather dates it.
As mentioned earlier, a small private indoor security system, fairly new on the mass market even then. Worlds away from a city wide outdoor surveillance grid, that had not really taken hold anywhere yet, and certainly not in Paris.But how can that be? Just look at this.
See how Orwellian Paris was? And this was just a hotel.
But how can that be? Just look at this.
See how Orwellian Paris was? And this was just a hotel.
Have you heard any theorists or investigators challenging the French government, saying "what about the cameras we have identified at these locations X, Y, Z, etc? Why hasn't their video been released?"No but my wife has been to Europe numerous times.
She went to Poland and said that Poland has literally ZERO privacy. There is a camera in every single nook and cranny, just like in America.
Or even worse.
I just can't concede this point. The government had satellites that could watch a woman's breasts from outer space....in 1970.
I just can't fathom ever-present surveillance NOT being in France in 1997.
Especially if it was a famous woman who was the enemy of the military industrial complex...no, she was under constant surveillance by both the government and the paparazzi.

It doesn't matter what you can fathom, bro. We were all adults and were there and lived it. You can't picture a town that didn't have widespread surveillance. We can. We were there.I just can't concede this point. The government had satellites that could watch a woman's breasts from outer space....in 1970.
I just can't fathom ever-present surveillance NOT being in France in 1997.
Especially if it was a famous woman who was the enemy of the military industrial complex...no, she was under constant surveillance by both the government and the paparazzi.
Just a hotel. Just your average, run-of-the-mill Paris Ritz. The sort of hotel where I remember in the '90s ordering a scotch and being charged the price of two bottles of single malt. Prices to keep the riffraff away. (Okay that was the George V rather than the Ritz but same deal.)But how can that be? Just look at this.
See how Orwellian Paris was? And this was just a hotel.