The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
Now, historical disaster porn astrology spamming. Talk about post-diction, the 1883 TV series has more historical relevance.
Maybe the first few times. But the fun is wearing off when it is just more of the same all the time.I remember once, many many years ago, I did a dramatic reading of one of Pixie of Key's posts. It was pretty funny.
If this video in any way echoes your irrelevant ramblings, it is not worth wasting time on. Especially when you don’t show the courtesy of describing what it is about, and why it should be relevant for the “discussion”.Video
Yes, it is too much unevidenced, contrafactual nonsense to digest at once.Yes yes, i know, this all is just too much for you and all physicist and cosmologist![]()
Nope, the reference to "A long lasting (7-hrs) auroral substorm" indicates charged particles interacting with a magnetic field. Likely from the recent (at that time) Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) from the sun.Savorinen asks, did researchers detect the effects of dark energy on May 29, 2023? Martian climate change.
Strong thermospheric response to the almost undetectable substorm on May 29, 2023
Plain Language Summary
A fast interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) and its upstream sheath caused severe disturbances in the Earth's magnetosphere during 23–24 April 2023. The sheath anti-sunward of the fast ICME shock was composed of high-density plasmas and intense magnetic fields. This was followed by a plasma density rarefaction and intense magnetic fields with a field rotation (known as a magnetic cloud). This complex interplanetary structure resulted in a double-peak geomagnetic storm, and several intense auroral substorms. Solar wind kinetic energy transferred into the magnetosphere during the geomagnetic storm caused large Joule heating in the auroral ionosphere in both dayside and nightside of Earth. Compression of the magnetosphere by the shock/sheath caused losses of relativistic-energy electrons from the outer radiation belt at the beginning of the magnetospheric event. The equatorial ionospheric anomaly structure, characterized by a low plasma region on the geomagnetic equator and plasma enhancements on both sides (∼±10°) of the equator, was significantly altered during the magnetic storm. In particular, the plasma density crests were more intense and expanded in hemispherical distribution. These variations are attributed to the prompt penetration electric fields to the equatorial ionosphere, which in turn modulated the equatorial ionospheric dynamics. These results should be important for prediction and modeling of geomagnetic storms and their impacts.
The Pacific Ocean is not on Mars.Highlights
•
A long lasting (7-hrs) auroral substorm occurred on 29 May 2023. The substorm was not captured in AE.
•
The substorm caused thermospheric O/N2 depletion which expanded to low Latitudes (∼30°) in the Pacific Ocean.
•
The substorm led to a storm-like equatorward meridional wind (∼450 m/s) at a sub-auroral latitude.
•
Zonal wind changed from westward to eastward, likely due to the competition between pressure gradient and Coriolis forces.
This video explains that no one understands what was going on. Where did the energy that caused this phenomenon come from?
[.... Disaster porn astrology snipped...]
The essential thing here is that it is not space that is expanding.
[...baseless speculations snipped....]
Yes yes, i know, this all is just too much for you and all physicist and cosmologist![]()
I'm making a note in my calendar and will remind you on the 20th.12.3 – 19.3.2025 a lot will happen IF I am right!
The fact that you can pull a rope does not mean that there are any pulling forces.Nope, the reference to "A long lasting (7-hrs) auroral substorm" indicates charged particles interacting with a magnetic field. Likely from the recent (at that time) Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) from the sun.
The April 2023 SYM-H = −233 nT Geomagnetic Storm: A Classical Event
The Pacific Ocean is not on Mars.
The link I provided above explains that people do understand exactly what is going on. That you clearly don't is simply your problem. As noted "the energy that caused this phenomenon" came from the Sun, though in the form of a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) around that time in addition to the normal solar radiation that generally drives the Earth's weather.
Most evidently it is just you for whom any of this is "too much for". Took you over a decade to simply admit you couldn't push something with a rope like you could pulling it. Clearly demonstrating the different effects of pushing and pulling forces on materials in an everyday type application. Differences you were clearly aware of but simply would not admit.
You still seem unable to agree with just yourself that a falling apple moves towards the Earth regardless of if you think it is also being pushed away. Likewise, you have provided no preliminary rates for your expanding stuff just to see if what you claim is happening is even merely self-consistent.
You still don't seem to understand the factors involved in Earth's weather let alone the relevance of space weather.
Space Weather Prediction Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Do please let us know when any of this starts not to be too much for you and you can at least agree with just yourself and then perhaps agree with simple observations (like pushing and pulling with a rope) as well as well established research and resources.
Good! Do itI'm making a note in my calendar and will remind you on the 20th.
Good, remind me 20 March, but remember that this Volcanoes can activate with Delay and speciality this quite strong Earth Quakes usually coming with Delay.I'm making a note in my calendar and will remind you on the 20th.
Hedging already?Good, remind me 20 March, but remember that this Volcanoes can activate with Delay and speciality this quite strong Earth Quakes usually coming with Delay.
Indeed.Hedging already?
The fact that you can pull a rope does not mean that there are any pulling forces.
Again, demonstrably, just for you.And this is of course too much for you.
Yet no scientific evidence is offered that there is even an "expanding rope" or an "expanding hand" in any "scientifically proven way". In fact by your own assertions we can't even detect this claimed "expanding" because everything is expanding.First of all, it is a scientific fact that an expanding rope must be pushed in a certain direction by an expanding hand.
And when an expanding rope is attached to an expanding object, it exerts a pushing force on it in a scientifically proven way.
The fact that the distance between the expanding atomic nuclei of an expanding rope cannot grow longer than normal is of course due to the fact that each expanding atomic nucleus exerts a pushing force that spreads out into space on the expanding atomic nuclei around it.
If the one next to it is pushed less towards this expanding atomic nucleus, it is able to push the atomic nucleus next to it in the direction where the expanding rope is being pushed.
You do to pull something and your claim of a lack of "need" in no way refutes the clearly demonstrable fact the materials react differently to pulling forces than they do to pushing forces.You do not need pulling forces for anything.
This is why you still do not have a theory of everything in physics.
That is, because you believe that gravitational forces exist.
Of course, this tricking space-time is also a factor in why you still don't have a theory of everything in physics.
Only losers explain observations with the help of tricking space-time.
Truth is too much for you
.