There are many websites about spiritsAll that response tells me is that you don't have an answer to basic questions
There are many websites about spiritsAll that response tells me is that you don't have an answer to basic questions
What I know about spirits is in booksAll that response tells me is that you don't have an answer to basic questions
Whereas you're very credulous. Fortunately, that's alright, as it's a curable condition. Many of us have gone through it.you are victims of pathological skepticism
Skepticism.is simply questioning a premise, and evaluating it critically. Ghosties don't survive cursory scrutiny.you are victims of pathological skepticism
You're a victim of wishful thinking.you are victims of pathological skepticism
You need to meet Marcello TruzziThere are many websites about Harry Potter.
Books are sometimes written by people that don't know much of anything either.
Smooth talkers are unimpressive to myself and many others. A good con man spins a convincing tale.You need to meet Marcello Truzzi
Excessive skepticism can lead to the exclusion of innovative ideas that challenge the status quoYou're a victim of wishful thinking
Scientific skeptics can be accused of being closed-minded, inhibiting scientific progress by rejecting new ideas without adequate investigation.Smooth talkers are unimpressive to myself and many others. A good con man spins a convincing tale.
Ghosties have been investigated up one side and down the other for eons, with dead zero evidence of their existance. That's not being closed minded; that is reaching the only conclusion a skeptic can scientifically reach.Scientific skeptics can be accused of being closed-minded, inhibiting scientific progress by rejecting new ideas without adequate investigation.
Although many studies have been conducted on phenomena associated with ghosts, the absence of concrete evidence does not mean that the issue is completely resolved or that the investigation is worthless. Scientific research is dynamic and can evolve with new technologies and methodologies.Ghosties have been investigated up one side and down the other for eons, with dead zero evidence of their existance. That's not being closed minded; that is reaching the only conclusion a skeptic can scientifically reach.
Do what I did, go back to school, do some pseudoskepticism in college, and learn to ask better questions.
You've got two radically different posting styles there, ducky.Although many studies have been conducted on phenomena associated with ghosts, the absence of concrete evidence does not mean that the issue is completely resolved or that the investigation is worthless. Scientific research is dynamic and can evolve with new technologies and methodologies.
Sceptics minds are open to whatever evidence and logical arguments can be presented. It's believers minds which are firmly closed.Scientific skeptics can be accused of being closed-minded, inhibiting scientific progress by rejecting new ideas without adequate investigation.
Pixel42, why don't you believe in spirits?Sceptics minds are open to whatever evidence and logical arguments can be presented. It's believers minds which are firmly closed.
Fun Fact: scientists don't tend to socialize with other scientists who are not in their discipline. Geologists don't hang with geophysicists. Geophysicists don't hang with physicists. Physicists don't hang with physicians, and so on. Out here MBARI tried to design a workspace where the various scientists would comingle and it has mostly failed. The result is the information that can move geology forward might already be possessed by geophysics, but geologists are unaware of the data because it never makes its way down the hall.Although many studies have been conducted on phenomena associated with ghosts, the absence of concrete evidence does not mean that the issue is completely resolved or that the investigation is worthless. Scientific research is dynamic and can evolve with new technologies and methodologies.