The thing is, it wouldn't even matter if he was correct, because self ID means that there is no possible way, EVEN IN PRINCIPLE, to tell the difference between cis males and transgender women. So even if the risk is only from cis males, self ID still means that you're exposing women to the threat of cis males.
(Well, ok, it's just a cute name for a subclass of the ipse dixit fallacy -- literally, because he said so himself -- especially when it happens repeatedly. See also "truthiness".)
You got me. I practiced a bit of hyperbole. Now where's your credible evidence for assaults committed by Trans individuals in public restrooms. After all, that is your argument isn't it? That the women folk need protection from the invisible scourge of transgenderism. That we should halt gender affirming care. That we turn transgenderism into a criminal offense.
It really wasn't any competitive stuff, just the PE teacher going, right, the girls in the class go inside play basketball, the boys play football outside. And I never changed together with them. Also I made it a point to immediately pass the ball than shoot at the basket. Judge that as you will, I make no apologies.
Wow. It's not just statistics that you pull out of your ass. It's entire arguments as well.
Well, I'm still OK with people doing WTH harm they want to themselves if they're adults. Not to others, but if it's just them wanting to amputate a healthy leg (see, Body Integrity Identity Disorder, aka, Body Integrity Dysphoria) or lopping their own todger off, eh, I've always said we need more volunteers for the Darwin Awards (which making oneself sterile does qualify for) to delay the inevitable onset of the idiocracy
Told you since 2009 that I wasn't a nice person
It's just when children are told by figures of authority that the reason why they're awkward isn't, say, Asperger's but that they need to be in a different body, that gets my blood boiling.
Again, you make another nonsense claim.
What's nonsense about it? I'm all ears.
Wrong. Rolfe has actually presented you with the UK government corrections figures as evidence you asked for.... NOT a poll, NOT an estimate, but a hard, head count of actual numbers. The fact that you pretended she didn't and then lied about it does not make those figures "bull"!!
No he didn't. He said it came out of analysis of prison population in England and Wales. And then didn’t present the analysis. And by the way, what relevance to prison inmates have to do with public restrooms?
It has to do with the relative risk of sexual assault from cis men vs trans women. Did you forget you made a claim about that?
wingsoverscotland.com
