Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2003
- Messages
- 61,670
That's an illogical comparison. You should be comparing yourself to the abolitionist. But they had good arguments. You have not put forward good arguments for banning porn. That requires more than just asserting harm (and much of the harm you have asserted isn't supported by evidence). You have to argue that the effects of banning are net positive. And you haven't even tried to make that argument.So is slavery. How vocal were those that favoured keeping slavery in the 19th century?
Sure. But banning didn't work, did it? Why do you think banning porn will? Have you considered that maybe there are better ways to reduce porn consumption?Something should be done about excessive alcohol consumption.
At this very moment? Probably not. Have they ever? Yeah, probably.Are millions of children watching porn right now?
Most of them will probably survive.
