Lennart Hyland
Muse
Oh no! I haven't read it but I have it on my list mostly because someone told me the ending was beautiful and made him cryAnother stupid ending was 11/22/63.
-
Oh no! I haven't read it but I have it on my list mostly because someone told me the ending was beautiful and made him cryAnother stupid ending was 11/22/63.
-
Just because Amy Strange says the ending is bad, that doesn't mean you'll find it bad. In fact, it can even help you make informed choices about good stuff to read.Oh no! I haven't read it but I have it on my list mostly because someone told me the ending was beautiful and made him cry![]()
Oh no! I haven't read it but I have it on my list mostly because someone told me the ending was beautiful and made him cry![]()
Just because Amy Strange says the ending is bad, that doesn't mean you'll find it bad. In fact, it can even help you make informed choices about good stuff to read.
Now that I know Amy disliked the endings of The Stand and The Dark Tower, and she also dislikes the ending of 11/22/63, I'm thinking I might actually enjoy it. On the other hand, his opinion of Under the Dome tells me that I probably won't like it. Not that I think he's stupid and wrong; we just have a clear difference in taste. I've found many an enjoyable movie, by paying attention to movie reviewers who hate the kinds of movies I like. Their negative review is just as informative to me as a positive review from a critic who shares my taste.
Sometimes he's just taking the correct route. 11/22/63, for example, has the correct ending.You're right, but just because you think they were good endings, doesn't mean that they really are either.
Anyway, regardless of the endings, they're still worth reading (you obviously ignored this part for some reason) if only because SK does write great characters, and the plot lines are usually pretty good, except for the endings, but that's just my opinion and not a fact, any more than yours are real facts too.
ETA: Read Under the Dome because as usual SK (like I just wrote) writes great characters and plot lines, especially if you like...
...playing video games.
Maybe instead of stupid, I should've used the word lazy. SK is a great writer, but some of his endings are lazy and unimaginative, like he didn't want to take the time to think up a good one and just took the easy route instead.
-
Sometimes he's just taking the correct route. 11/22/63, for example, has the correct ending.
Jesus Christ. I'm no fan of rom-coms, but I at least understand they have a certain structure, that I can appreciate and respect.Personally, I think it's a good read. The characters and plotline are awesome, but that doesn't mean I have to like the ending. I think it's just too negative, but then again, SK is a master of horror, and that ending fits his persona.
All of SK's books (at least the approximately 30+ that I've read) are good reads because his characters and plotlines are all awesome, and just because I think some of the endings suck doesn't mean I'm right, and you're wrong.
It also doesn't mean you're right, and I'm wrong either.
-
I'm often reminded of the ending of The Long Walk. (as Richard Bachman) A longer short story about a contest where the participants have to walk dozens of miles maintaining above a certain pace, or be shot. The last remaining one wins. Quite interesting all the way through, but I had to reread the last page a couple times to figure out what finally happened. I'm not sure I ever did.Personally, I think it's a good read. The characters and plotline are awesome, but that doesn't mean I have to like the ending. I think it's just too negative, but then again, SK is a master of horror, and that ending fits his persona.
All of SK's books (at least the approximately 30+ that I've read) are good reads because his characters and plotlines are all awesome, and just because I think some of the endings suck doesn't mean I'm right, and you're wrong.
It also doesn't mean you're right, and I'm wrong either.
ETA: Maybe (like I posted earlier) instead of stupid, I should've used the word lazy. SK is a great writer, but some of his endings are lazy and unimaginative, like he didn't want to take the time to think up a good one and just took the easy route instead.
-
Jesus Christ. I'm no fan of rom-coms, but I at least understand they have a certain structure, that I can appreciate and respect.
A horror writer writes a story with a gut-punch ending and you complain it's stupid. Let me guess: You think the ending of "I Have No Mouth But I Must Scream" is lazy and stupid. Without having actually read it.
For a self professed storyteller, you seem to have a weak grasp of how stories work.
That's the one. And it was not just bad, it was BAD. The Dark Tower was pretty variable overall, with some of the books (or portions of books) being quite good and some just stinking so bad they could have been skipped altogether.Isn't that the one where the main character...
Another stupid ending was 11/22/63.
-
All of SK's books (at least the approximately 30+ that I've read) are good reads because his characters and plotlines are all awesome, and just because I think some of the endings suck doesn't mean I'm right, and you're wrong.
Jesus Christ. I'm no fan of rom-coms, but I at least understand they have a certain structure, that I can appreciate and respect.
A horror writer writes a story with a gut-punch ending and you complain it's stupid. Let me guess: You think the ending of "I Have No Mouth But I Must Scream" is lazy and stupid. Without having actually read it.
For a self professed storyteller, you seem to have a weak grasp of how stories work.
That's the one. And it was not just bad, it was BAD. The Dark Tower was pretty variable overall, with some of the books (or portions of books) being quite good and some just stinking so bad they could have been skipped altogether.
Needful Things was pretty good, 11/22/63 wasn't my favorite, but as I recall (it's been a while) but I quite liked the way it started. I liked The Stand, ending included.
Agreed. I've been reading King since Carrie was serialized in Penthouse (I think it was Penthouse) and have enjoyed most of them.
But it seems like in the last decade or two he's gotten so big no editor will actually edit him and we wind up with a potentially great story like The Dark Tower where he just rambles on and on. I think that series could have been much better at about 30% less length.
It was the extended edition, which has an epilog, and I liked it. But it would have been a good ending even without it, I think.Did you read the original version or the rewrote one? The rewrote one seems to continue on after the original ending, and sounds like this one might be better, but that's just my opinion and NOT a fact.
It was the extended edition, which has an epilog, and I liked it. But it would have been a good ending even without it, I think.
And crap, now I think it was Firestarter that I read as serial, not Carrie.
I'm so sorry.I just got done reading Moby Dick...
I was sometimes amused at the formatting. I even considered making a joke version with "Just the punctuation". There are a couple sequences in there with such long run-on sentences it's ridiculous.
I was surprised it took so long for the title character to show up. Nowadays he'd have to have an attack in the first chapter.