• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Kamala Harris Election Campaign

I watched the whole thing unfold in real time on Jan 6th 2021, with my jaw on the floor. Nobody is going to gaslight me into believing that what actually happened is different to what I watched happen with my own eyes.

I have also listened to Trump try to browbeat and bully the governor of Georgia into falsifying the results of the 2020 election.

I have followed the progress of the dozens of court cases which falsely alleged election fraud, and watched them be rightly thrown out.

Trump tried to steal the 2020 election by any and all means at his disposal. That is a fact.
 
Sherkeu said:
Everything you just said pixel is a lie. Go watch the tapes. Read the tweets. See Pelosi statement on not taking nat guard. See proof of instigator.
Trump contested the result and wanted it rectified...which he would never be able to do without the courts. It was too late. He made a speech. He was mad that no one wanted to litigate his case.

He did not tell ANYONE to go and break into the Capitol. He told them to protest peacefully. Those were his actual words.
Did you physically hear Trump say different words than the ones he is on video saying? And then tweeting for it to be peaceful...and then tweeting for them to leave the area?

What was Pelosi doing as the top person in charge of capitol security?
Click to expand...
Just pathetic.
 
Pixel42 said:
I watched the whole thing unfold in real time on Jan 6th 2021, with my jaw on the floor. Nobody is going to gaslight me into believing that what actually happened is different to what I watched happen with my own eyes.

I have also listened to Trump try to browbeat and bully the governor of Georgia into falsifying the results of the 2020 election.

I have followed the progress of the dozens of court cases which falsely alleged election fraud, and watched them be rightly thrown out.

Trump tried to steal the 2020 election by any and all means at his disposal. That is a fact.
Click to expand...
How dare you trying factual reality?
Factual reality just got deselected.
What you saw is just your own version of reality. And because the majority believes in a different reality, yours just became an alternate one.
 
Pixel42 said:
Can you really not see the difference between ordinary citizens rioting due to (arguably legitimate) grievances, and a sitting President whipping up a mob of his most crackpot supporters and sending them to invade the seat of your democracy in an attempt to prevent the peaceful transition of power to his fairly elected successor? Even if they'd been stopped before the violence, horror would still have been the appropriate response. The fact that the man responsible for this outrageous attack on democracy may be about to be democratically reelected is making me feel physically sick.
Click to expand...
Of the George Floyd protests far fewer than five percent of them turned violent, and the majority of violence was instigated and caused by far-right agents povocateur, the likes of Rittenhouse.
 
IMnotreallyHO, Harris did not run the best possible campaign. Her message became increasingly "vote for me because I'm not Donald Trump". It's great that she had a lengthy discussion on her ideas on the campaign's website, but where was that in her speeches? The Republican Party's chief pollster, Frank Lunz, has said basically the same thing.
 
Some satire. I might have posted it. But now a picture.


jilljohnson.jpg
 
TellyKNeasuss said:
IMnotreallyHO, Harris did not run the best possible campaign. Her message became increasingly "vote for me because I'm not Donald Trump". It's great that she had a lengthy discussion on her ideas on the campaign's website, but where was that in her speeches? The Republican Party's chief pollster, Frank Lunz, has said basically the same thing.
Click to expand...
Where were trump's policies in his speeches? Rallies aren't for getting into policy detail.
 
Sherkeu said:
Everything you just said pixel is a lie. Go watch the tapes. Read the tweets. See Pelosi statement on not taking nat guard. See proof of instigator.
Trump contested the result and wanted it rectified...which he would never be able to do without the courts. It was too late. He made a speech. He was mad that no one wanted to litigate his case.

He did not tell ANYONE to go and break into the Capitol. He told them to protest peacefully. Those were his actual words.
Did you physically hear Trump say different words than the ones he is on video saying? And then tweeting for it to be peaceful...and then tweeting for them to leave the area?

What was Pelosi doing as the top person in charge of capitol security?
Click to expand...
He orchestrated an attack on the Capitol to prevent the certification of a free and fair election.

FOH with that BS
 
Donal said:
He orchestrated an attack on the Capitol to prevent the certification of a free and fair election.

FOH with that BS
Click to expand...
So tell me his plan.
1. Have the stop the steal rally
2. then... citizens attack capitol that has armed police.
3. and. ?
4.Then WIN!

Was that it?

So he told the crowd to be peaceful but he really really just wanted to take over the capitol with no army or guns or coalition at all. Just somehow it would work. Okayyyyy.
 
Sherkeu said:
So tell me his plan.
1. Have the stop the steal rally
2. then... citizens attack capitol that has armed police.
3. and. ?
4.Then WIN!

Was that it?

So he told the crowd to be peaceful but he really really just wanted to take over the capitol with no army or guns or coalition at all. Just somehow it would work. Okayyyyy.
Click to expand...
He's a moron who acts out of his fragile ego and hurt feelings. Maybe he had a concept of a plan.

We saw and heard what he and the other speakers were yelling at the crowd of frothing idiots. We heard the testimony of people around him that day.
 
Gulliver Foyle said:
Of the George Floyd protests far fewer than five percent of them turned violent, and the majority of violence was instigated and caused by far-right agents povocateur, the likes of Rittenhouse.
Click to expand...
See, that's the kind of misinformation that turns people off from Dems.

Rittenhouse didn't instigate anything, they weren't a provocateur. Rittenhouse was a kid who went to defend the business of an acquaintance from looters and rioters who had "mostly peacefully" been setting things on fire, destroying property, and stealing ◊◊◊◊ for days. Rittenhouse didn't START anything, they were CHASED by people who would not leave a minor alone. Rittenhouse DEFENDED themself from being violently attacked by grown-ass adults who were trying to beat the crap out of a teen.

But the media and your ilk have taken it upon yourself to lie about the situation and paint Rittenhouse as if they were some sort of anarchistic ne'er-do-well who went there with the sole purpose of killing some peaceful kumbaya-singing candle-holding innocents.

This is the framing that gets put forth. But real people have eyes, we have brains, we see and we can understand what was going on. And you know what? A significant number of those real people with real eyes and real brains know that this narrative of Rittenhouse being a "provocateur" is ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊.

The same ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ thing happened with that kid who got ran through the ringer for the unforgiveable sin of wearing a MAGA hat and smiling uncomfortably while adults insulted and berated them, banged drums in their faces, and otherwise made them miserable.

Just be ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ honest, and insist that your news outlets be honest. Is that really too much to ask for?
 
Emily's Cat said:
See, that's the kind of misinformation that turns people off from Dems.

Rittenhouse didn't instigate anything, they weren't a provocateur. Rittenhouse was a kid who went to defend the business of an acquaintance from looters and rioters who had "mostly peacefully" been setting things on fire, destroying property, and stealing **** for days. Rittenhouse didn't START anything, they were CHASED by people who would not leave a minor alone. Rittenhouse DEFENDED themself from being violently attacked by grown-ass adults who were trying to beat the crap out of a teen.

But the media and your ilk have taken it upon yourself to lie about the situation and paint Rittenhouse as if they were some sort of anarchistic ne'er-do-well who went there with the sole purpose of killing some peaceful kumbaya-singing candle-holding innocents.

This is the framing that gets put forth. But real people have eyes, we have brains, we see and we can understand what was going on. And you know what? A significant number of those real people with real eyes and real brains know that this narrative of Rittenhouse being a "provocateur" is ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊.

The same ******* thing happened with that kid who got ran through the ringer for the unforgiveable sin of wearing a MAGA hat and smiling uncomfortably while adults insulted and berated them, banged drums in their faces, and otherwise made them miserable.

Just be ******* honest, and insist that your news outlets be honest. Is that really too much to ask for?
Click to expand...

"I aM noT MAGA"
 
plague311 said:
"I aM noT MAGA"
Click to expand...
So in your view, honestly admitting that a kid got chased around town by violent adults for several minutes before defending themselves means I'm "MAGA". Somehow, lying about the situation in order to demonize a teen and make a grown up aggressor intent on harm is the "good thing" in your view?

It's retarded that an objective understanding of the events is something you consider to be "MAGA".
 
Emily's Cat said:
So in your view, honestly admitting that a kid got chased around town by violent adults for several minutes before defending themselves means I'm "MAGA". Somehow, lying about the situation in order to demonize a teen and make a grown up aggressor intent on harm is the "good thing" in your view?

It's retarded that an objective understanding of the events is something you consider to be "MAGA".
Click to expand...

Something's definitely retarded. No, what's MAGA is changing the facts as if he wasn't breaking the ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ law to be there. Like he had some civic duty to do in a city he didn't live in, on property he didn't own, using a gun he illegally obtained.

Like I said, something is absolutely retarded. We differ on what exactly that is, but this is off topic. So have the last word, I care very, very little now that you're out of the MAGA closet, but still vehemently denying it. It's ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ laughable.
 
Let me quote killer Kyle in reference to shoplifters: "I will ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ murder them!"

A former spokesperson for Kyle Rittenhouse says he became disillusioned with his ex-client after learning that he had sent text messages pledging to “◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ murder” shoplifters outside a pharmacy before later shooting two people to death during racial justice protests in Wisconsin in 2020.

Dave Hancock made that remark about Rittenhouse – for whom he also worked as a security guard – on a Law & Crime documentary that premiered on Friday. The show explored the unsuccessful criminal prosecution of Rittenhouse, who killed Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber in Kenosha, Wisconsin.


As Hancock told it on The Trials of Kyle Rittenhouse, the 90-minute film’s main subject had “a history of things he was doing prior to [the double slaying], specifically patrolling the street for months with guns and borrowing people’s security uniforms, doing whatever he could to try to get into some kind of a fight”.
Click to expand...

He seems nice.
 
NPR calls Trump win decisive.
Me: Trump won by 100 000 in maybe 3 states. Several million democrats in blue states did not vote because it made no difference there. Decisive is 2-3% in a few states?
www.threads.net

NPR (@npr) on Threads

With a race that was expected to be historically tight behind us, the question is: How did Trump win so decisively?
www.threads.net www.threads.net
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom