• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

My TAM4 report (long)

easycruise said:
I like their "logic" much better than any liberal Democrat's on most policy issues. Since you don't present any facts or evidence, I'll just presume that you are trying to find a way to discount and cheapen the factual evidence that they do present on those same policy issues.
Click to expand...

my favorite Hannity moment is when in his book he detailed how during certain years of the Clinton presidency he purchased zero tanks while Reagan bought hundreds of them. Proof that Clinton was gutting the military.

Of course Hannity neglected to mention how GWB didn't purchase any either (after all the cold war was over and the risk of the Soviet Union rolling into Europe is close to zero thus the vast decline in the need for tanks)

I like the way my favorite left-wing wacko Al Franken likened it to saying John F. Kennedy bought zero horses during his presidency and Lincoln bought over 4,000. Proof that JFK was gutting the military.

sorry for the derail.
 
The Central Scrutinizer said:
They are, in fact extremists. And you'll note that they fail to point out their own faulty logic. They regularly have holes in their "logic" large enough to drive a truck through. I would destroy either of them in a debate.
.
Click to expand...

I'm still waiting for you to explain your definition of "extremist". You only claim (without supporting evidence) that they fail to use proper logic. That hardly meets the requirements to be defined an "extremist". I think it would behoove you to check a dictionary. I am sure I would destroy you in a debate.
 
The Central Scrutinizer said:
I have to admit I do like your avatar of the heroic rescue of kidnap victim Elian Gonzalez!
Click to expand...

Only a true leftist would love that picture of a true police state in action. Waco comes to mind as well. Both happened under Clinton. And the leftists seemingly ignore these incidents while wrongly criticizing Bush for fomenting a police state. You gotta love the hypocrisy!
 
HarryKeogh said:
my favorite Hannity moment is when in his book he detailed how during certain years of the Clinton presidency he purchased zero tanks while Reagan bought hundreds of them. Proof that Clinton was gutting the military.

Of course Hannity neglected to mention how GWB didn't purchase any either (after all the cold war was over and the risk of the Soviet Union rolling into Europe is close to zero thus the vast decline in the need for tanks)

I like the way my favorite left-wing wacko Al Franken likened it to saying John F. Kennedy bought zero horses during his presidency and Lincoln bought over 4,000. Proof that JFK was gutting the military.

sorry for the derail.
Click to expand...

My favorite Harry Keogh moment was when the Supreme Court handed down the eminent domain case and Harry was shocked to realize that he had sided with the likes of Scalia and Thomas. It was very amusing to see a leftist like Harry finally learn what the true face of liberalism really is.

BTW, it seems like you are confusing the elder Bush and GWB. But, it's hard to tell, since you provide no evidence to support your claim.
 
Last edited:
easycruise said:
Only a true leftist would love that picture of a true police state in action. Waco comes to mind as well. Both happened under Clinton. And the leftists seemingly ignore these incidents while wrongly criticizing Bush for fomenting a police state. You gotta love the hypocrisy!
Click to expand...

Let's see:

1) You think Hannity is intelligent
2) You think O'Reilly is intelligent
3) You support kidnappers

Oh dear. I bet you're a Libertarian, aren't you.

I have just destroyed you. Simple.
 
The Central Scrutinizer said:
Let's see:

1) You think Hannity is intelligent
2) You think O'Reilly is intelligent
3) You support kidnappers

Oh dear. I bet you're a Libertarian, aren't you.

I have just destroyed you. Simple.
Click to expand...

Is this really what passes for critical thinking on this forum? I must admit I am disappointed every time I come here. You call people extremists, provide no evidence to support it, only some off-handed comments about not using proper logic and provide no evidence for that either!

You sir, are no critical thinker. It's amazing you got to the post count you did without being laughed out of the forum. But, now I hold you up as proof of my claim of a lack of critical thinkers on this forum. Thanks!
 
easycruise said:
Is this really what passes for critical thinking on this forum? I must admit I am disappointed every time I come here. You call people extremists, provide no evidence to support it, only some off-handed comments about not using proper logic and provide no evidence for that either!

You sir, are no critical thinker. It's amazing you got to the post count you did without being laughed out of the forum. But, now I hold you up as proof of my claim of a lack of critical thinkers on this forum. Thanks!
Click to expand...

Do all Libertarians support kidnappers, or just you?
 
easycruise said:
My favorite Harry Keogh moment was when the Supreme Court handed down the eminent domain case and Harry was shocked to realize that he had sided with the likes of Scalia and Thomas. It was very amusing to see a leftist like Harry finally learn what the true face of liberalism really is.
Click to expand...

I find it equally endearing and creepy that you have favorite Harry Keogh moments.

As for my feelings on the eminent domain case...surely, you don't blindly follow party lines do you? If you do I suggest you take a more active role in learning the issues instead of taking a party's word as gospel.

And as for the possibilty of getting my Bushes confused...it is quite possible. I'll check Al Franken's book and correct myself if necessary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom