• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Muslims Committing Blasphemy?

BPSCG

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Mar 27, 2002
Messages
17,539
What's this?

6pu2.jpg


And this?
hb_1974.294.2.jpg


How about this?
hb_57.51.9.jpg


Answer: They are all paintings of Muhammad done by Muslim artists.
Despite its rulers' current fulminations, Iran itself is full of pictures of Mohammed. While devout Shiites more often wear a pendant bearing a picture of Ali, a Companion of the Prophet central to the development of Shiism, it is not uncommon for them to wear one bearing Mohammed's face. Depictions of the Prophet also appear on major buildings, including mosques, and even on small kiosks selling cigarettes. For believers, they are certainly a real sign of devotion, but at the same time they are an implicit subversion of the regime. Like Stalin or Saddam Hussein have done, Iran's dictators demand that those they rule subject themselves to the idolatrous image of the Supreme Leader, whether the Ayatollah Khomeini or current Ayatollah Khamenei, by putting their stern visages in their homes, offices, and shops. In the face of this repression, a picture of the Prophet is a rebuke to those who put themselves in his place.
 
Very interesting. Thanks for pointing this out. I've always thought depictions of any image other than patterns were forbidden by Islam.
Are these supposed to be exceptions, or have I misunderstood that, I wonder?
 
Actually,

The koran doesn't say you can't draw their prophet. It has become a tradition not for fear of idol crap.
 
Actually,

The koran doesn't say you can't draw their prophet. It has become a tradition not for fear of idol crap.

The Koran doesn't, but the Old Testament does. Remember, Muslims use both testaments as well.

The passage you're looking for is Exodus chapter 20, verse 4.
 
I was wondering if all the attention paid to the Mohammed cartoons by the Muslims is not some sort of blasphemy in a weird sort of way. Idolatry is supposed to be about adoration and veneration, granted, but I can't help but feel that there is some irony here. I just can put my finger on it.
 
What's this?

Shi'a Islam doesn't use the hadith that sunnis use to bar images of mohamed. One of many reasons why sunni and shi'a don't always get on.
 
A lot of the art is Sufi or Dervish. Also, the Shiite seem less adverse to portrayal of Muhammed than the Sunni.

The Taleban went about slaughtering quite a few Sufi's when they gained power in Afghanistan.

If the troops weren't there to give them a nice rallying point they'd probably go back to fighting each other with chemical weapons. :rolleyes:
 
Ah! they have the 'super best friends' episode of south park. that's one of the best ever.
 
I was wondering if all the attention paid to the Mohammed cartoons by the Muslims is not some sort of blasphemy in a weird sort of way. Idolatry is supposed to be about adoration and veneration, granted, but I can't help but feel that there is some irony here. I just can put my finger on it.

It is indeed ironic that muslims are angry due to their own idolatry of Muhammed. They are the ones disregarding the Quran's bidding.
 
Shi'a Islam doesn't use the hadith that sunnis use to bar images of mohamed. One of many reasons why sunni and shi'a don't always get on.
So why don't they riot and burn each other's embassies? Instead of going after the poor Danes and Norwegians?
 
So why don't they riot and burn each other's embassies? Instead of going after the poor Danes and Norwegians?

Because they have never really bothered being that subtle. The shi'a upriseing at the end of DS1 and what happened next for example.
 

Back
Top Bottom