thaiboxerken
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2001
- Messages
- 34,570
He's also a convicted felon and adjucated rapist.
Insidiously divisive rhetoric rates are higher among blacks, hispanics, and- wait, what were we talking about?Four posts and counting complaining about this "insidiously divisive" ad. How many posts complaining about any of Trump's divisive rhetoric which is truly insidious? Without even checking, I'm going to go out on a limb and guess somewhere around zero.
Your assertion is not supported by data.Domestic violence rates are higher among black, hispanic, and asian populations than among whites. If the prevailing "wisdom" holds that all of those ethnic groups are predominantly democrats, it might challenge your assumption.
But I see the ad plays right into your own biases, so there's that I suppose.
It's a political issue if men are controlling how their wives vote.I agree that it happens, and that it's more likely in general to be males exerting coercive control than females.
What I don't like is the framing of this as the basis of a political ad. Domestic violence and coercive control isn't a political issue, it's a social issue. I think it's a bad idea to weaponize it as a political issue, and to sow mistrust and discord among couples. I also think it's horribly bad taste to base the message on the double whammy of 1) males are bad and 2) males support Trump. It's an insidiously divisive narrative.
How is reminding people that their vote is secret sowing mistrust and discord?
I'd much rather see a wide open and genuine smile than Trump's disingenuous smirk that passes for a smile.I wish Harris well and hope she wins, but I'm getting utterly sick of the sight of her manic, mouth wide open 'smile'.
I think I saw him briefly crack an actual, genuine smile when he talked about Arnold Palmer's penis. It's the only time I've ever seen that.I'd much rather see a wide open and genuine smile than Trump's disingenuous smirk that passes for a smile.
I hear that in the Trump bible, the description of the Behemoth in Job has been modified to refer to Arnold Palmer.I think I saw him briefly crack an actual, genuine smile when he talked about Arnold Palmer's penis. It's the only time I've ever seen that.
That’s…strange.I wish Harris well and hope she wins, but I'm getting utterly sick of the sight of her manic, mouth wide open 'smile'.
i never listen to Trump, fullstop.Yeah, because if there's one thing positive one can say about Donald Trump, it is that he has no annoying tics or mannerisms whatsoever...
Dale Partridge, Pastor of Kingsway Reformed Church in Prescott Arizona saysNah, it was pointing out the ecological fallacy. Ken has made a baseless assumption that Trump supporters are more likely to control their spouses than Harris supporters. That assumption is driven by Ken's pre-existing belief that all Trump supporters (and by extension anyone who merely isn't a Harris supporter) is a bad person all around, a bigot and a racist and a sexist and any other bad term that they imagine can be applied to "the other guys". There's no evidence, no rationale involved.
I am not assuming that there's any material difference in the rates of domestic violence of coercive control by party.
In a Christian marriage, a wife should vote according to her husband’s direction.
He is the head and they are one.
Unity extends to politics.
This is not controversial.
“But as the church is subject to Christ, so also the wives ought to be to their husbands in everything.” -Ephesians 5:24
Now, submission does have limits. A wife doesn’t need to submit to her husband in sin (in this case voting democrat). In such cases, she submits to her heads’s Head—Christ. But outside of clear accounts of sin, she ought to conform and be one with her husband in all things.