Scopedog
Muse
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2012
- Messages
- 928
Examine it without the benefit of hindsight. How would it be interpreted at the time? It's March 2005. You're at the battalion staff level and you know Command Sergeant Major Walz has two years left on his contract that he's obligated to fulfill in order to maintain his conditional rank, even if only for retirement benefit purposes. You know your unit is deploying in the next two years. Command Sergeant Major Walz publishes a press release that says, "I'll deploy if called." How would you interpret his statement?I don't see how you can disagree with my interpretation as it's not my interpretation. It's what he actually said. "IF CALLED". He was not called. He retired before then.
Similar, though not exactly the same, I knew a guy, Sergeant (pay grade E5), who went to all the process of being approved to reenlist and even invited people to his reenlistment ceremony. He showed up to the ceremony and declined to sign the contract, which was his right to do. Up until that point his command thought they had him for another 4 years. I remember him being very religious and a decent guy and great leader. I think his wife convinced him to quit.
Enlisted Marines can be promoted to Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers. In the case of Warrant Officers, they get promoted to the pay grade of WO1 sometimes months before attending the required Warrant Officer Basic Course. If they're disqualified before or during the course, or quit the course, or fail the course, they revert to their enlisted rank. I don't look down on Marines who end up in that situation because at least they tried- I certainly never did. However, if they retire and say "I'm a retired Warrant Officer-1", that would irk me.How about you just take my anecdote about Custer for what it was? An interesting anecdote about a famous person who is commonly referred to with the rank of general yet was a colonel when he died on duty.
Last edited: