One thing that seems to be new is that the DEMs seem to be actively trolling Trump. And he tends to bite, every time.
Yes. I think she is taking her previous claim to be the Anti Trump to heart and embracing short, memorable ideas, "Weird Don" might be something he'd use
It's not a bad position to have.in many cases the broad strokes are enough to garner support. But the specifics matter, and more importantly the ability of supporters to influence policy before someone is elected. It's why I don't agree that candidates running on the same basic platform are interchangeable.
...snip.
The hat by the way has raised more than a million dollars. Two million in sales. And that is in three days, They can't keep up and now are selling the hats with with the Harris Wolz logo silk screened instead of embroidered.
Links?The Democrats have published pix of Dumpty's rallies showing near-empty auditoriums. The pictures were taken, as it happens, some hours before he was due to speak. His tame news sources have had to counter with stories of how, for instance, the Bozeman MT arena filled to capacity (~9,000) by showtime. I haven't seen their pix of the hall, but they may be telling approximately the truth. MT is a blue state, and people are used to driving long distances to attend GOP church. Or just to get drunk.
My point is that the Dems pulled a dirty, sneaky, deceptive, almost lying trick, and succeeding in muddying the Trumpian waters. I'm grateful, of course. It's about time.
MSM sez that Kamala's rally in Arizona was held in a 20,000 seat arena, and that about 15,000 people showed up. Huh. Reckon they's tellen the true truth too.
MSM sez that Kamala's rally in Arizona
The Democrats have published pix of Dumpty's rallies showing near-empty auditoriums. The pictures were taken, as it happens, some hours before he was due to speak. His tame news sources have had to counter with stories of how, for instance, the Bozeman MT arena filled to capacity (~9,000) by showtime. I haven't seen their pix of the hall, but they may be telling approximately the truth. MT is a blue state, and people are used to driving long distances to attend GOP church. Or just to get drunk.
My point is that the Dems pulled a dirty, sneaky, deceptive, almost lying trick, and succeeding in muddying the Trumpian waters. I'm grateful, of course. It's about time.
MSM sez that Kamala's rally in Arizona was held in a 20,000 seat arena, and that about 15,000 people showed up. Huh. Reckon they's tellen the true truth too.
Sigh. No she isn't. This is a really stupid thing to say. Though not unexpected given how determinedly you have refused enlightenment.So she is running absent policy. For president. Glad we hashed that out. Vibes it is. Super serious stuff.
I see you're going for the misogynistic drivel again.Harris is obviously the most vacuous candidate in American history.
She is to be celebrated for this. It is not necessarily an indictment because the machinery of state is robust and America will be the greatest nation in the history of the world when we are chilling below the sod.
You clearly have no understanding of American history.
Harris is a blithering idiot but the state will survive and prosper.
This election matters.
Trump and Harris don't matter.
The direction of the enlightened west truly does matter.
Harris is attacking full frontal the way the west was won, and wishes to turn it over to the Islamists, and the various cults.
I am a profound Atheist, and wish Americans would grow up and ignore abortion.
Forgive student debt.Expanding the ACA.
Family medical leave.
National abortion rights law.
Higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations.
Stronger environmental protections.
Reductions in GHG emissions.
Probably rebates & discounts for E vehicles and solar panels.
Commitment to NATO and Israel being able to defend itself, but not offensive and dangerous weapons that too easily cause mass casualties.
Gaza cease fire now!!!
2 state solution for Israel and Palestine.
Support Ukraine!!!!
Ban assault weapons, high-capacity magazines.
Lower drug costs.
Pass the Lewis voting rights act.
Amend Supreme Court rules.
Maybe require police reform to get federal funds.
And the rest of the classic/standard Liberal Progressive agenda.
Happy now??????????????
Don't care if you ain't, you're 100% MAGA anyways, and would never vote Blue.
Is there a point buried in this steaming mass of drivel?The Harris Walz ticket gets this correct.
Why are they determined to throw all other female matters under the bus?
You won't try to answer because it is the Inconvenient truth for these terrible candidates.
What reason do you figure there is to avoid using the more unique & distinctive one, just like we all do with all other famous people's names?Hillary Clinton shared a surname with a prior President, so using her first name to differentiate her made sense. There's no Harris to confuse Kamala Harris with, so no reason not to refer to her by her last name, just like Walz.
You're thinking of the wrong New Jersey event. He was talking about the one in the part of the New Jersey coast that's famous for its thousand-foot mountains with unusually steep jungle-covered slopes. I heard one of the dozens of thousands of people there was Rod Stewart!But no less dirty than when Trump stages pictures and images with crowds that aren't there. Or audiences that are paid to be there. How about when Trump says he had more than a 100,000 people at a rally in Jersey in a venue that only held 10,000 people? And not only wasn't there even a 10,000 people, there wasn't 4,000 people there.
A suggest I'm copying from somebody else, not mine: compare their crowd sizes using a bar graph or column graph, but make the bars/columns look like penises, just to watch Trump react.What's kind of great about this is Trump is obsessed with size. And the Dems are trolling him with it.
Pathetic. You can't even get the names correct.Interesting.
I suggested Heather Mac Donald
Greg Lukhianoff
Michael Shellenberger.
What informs you that no one on ISF takes these people seriously?
Kamala Harris won't be interested because she is an air head, but I hope you will check their work and critique.
Biden has a 38% approval rating and was losing in the polls to Trump in a majority of swing states. I don't think she is running on the idea that she is Bidens policy mirror. If she is I want her to say it. This kind of gets back to the idea that some seem to think here that the candidate does not matter. I don't believe that.
What does that even mean, "invested" in it?
She didn't draft it. She wasn't even the candidate when it was drafted. How much input did she actually have on it? Possibly none, no one was obligated to listen to her when she was just VP candidate. Now, there tends to be quite a bit of correlation between the positions of people within the same party, so I'm not claiming that it's got nothing to do with her positions (she is still a democrat), but the party platform still isn't HER platform.
Links?