Kamala Harris Election Campaign

acbytesla said:
While I do disagree with Prestige on most everything. He is not usually not anti-social. And I wouldn't characterize this as anti-social.

But this latest post demonstrates a dishonest comparison between Trump and Harris. As well as a phony attempt of whataboutism.
Click to expand...

I would like whoever is running theprestige account to give back to the person who had it before.
 
theprestige said:
I admit it's a tough choice. The career criminal, or the career criminal protected by the political establishment. As long as insider trading is legal for Congress, I make no distinction between Trump and his peers in high elected office in this country.

Also you hate me, and think I'm too stupid to have a vote, and if you had your way I wouldn't. So I feel no special urge to elect your favorite corruptocrat just because they're your favorite.
Click to expand...


Ironic, as your little boy JD thinks I should have less of a vote cuz I got no kids.
 
jimbob said:
I've also seen creepy.

Creepy Donald would also work. Although I think weird probably works better, because it reminds of the creepy stuff, but also his disconnect from reality
Click to expand...

The Great Zaganza said:
Creepy has been already taken by Trumpers for Biden.
Click to expand...

Again with them, it's an admission.

Weird is definitely on brand for Trump's running mate as well.
 
kookbreaker said:
I would like whoever is running theprestige account to give back to the person who had it before.
Click to expand...

Sometimes, it definitely feels like Dr Jekyl and Mr Hyde. Usually, I see him as a thoughtful conservative. And I genuinely appreciate that. I rarely agree with his take on things. But it's important to hear other views when they are reasonably considered.

But his perspective on Harris wasn't honestly considered. And his conclusion that poliis a cr

It was a rationalization to support someone he knows is a fraud and a grifter. So what does he do? He projects. It is Trump's and now the right's favorite tactic. They can not defend Trump and his actions so instead they/he says their opponents do the same thing.

They want to suggest there is a moral equivalence. But it is not honest. It is not based on the facts. And Prestige didn't expect to be refuted quickly. So instead of continuing the engagement, he ran away.
 
A. I don't especially like the discourse about the Prestige, seems a bit snippy. But who cares what I think.

B. Buttigieg. I heard an interesting analysis of him as a possible running mate. He's basically a living shibboleth of the college educated elite lefty and will bring no votes that Harris is not already getting. I'm curious because I like Buttigieg but I also agree, not a great choice for the VP because he doesn't bring anything to the table Harris doesn't already have. Same for Newsom, though my feeling is Newsom actually brings more negatives than Buttigieg.

I'd like Buttigieg to run for the senate in NY or CA have a 10 ish years there then run for the POTUS.

C. I'd like Trump to have a monopoly on childish name calling in US politics.
 
Last edited:
I'm a bit confused is Prestige in the running to replace Vance as Trump's VP?

Otherwise it does seem like we are addressing the arguer not the argument.
 
Stacyhs said:
Unlike Trump who just used songs without permission and even against the instructions of those who held the rights.
Click to expand...

Gods do not need permission or even need to care about laws. I'm sure SCOTUS will rule this is the case, if you need clarification....
 
ahhell said:
B. Buttigieg. I heard an interesting analysis of him as a possible running mate. He's basically a living shibboleth of the college educated elite lefty and will bring no votes that Harris is not already getting. I'm curious because I like Buttigieg but I also agree, not a great choice for the VP because he doesn't bring anything to the table Harris doesn't already have. Same for Newsom, though my feeling is Newsom actually brings more negatives than Buttigieg.

I'd like Buttigieg to run for the senate in NY or CA have a 10 ish years there then run for the POTUS.
Click to expand...
He's from Indiana, though. Why would he need to spend a decade being a senator from a state he's never lived in?
 
I think Harris presents a unique make-or-break for non-MAGA Republicans. How can they vote for a California Democrat? How a "DEI hire"? Can they help elect a Dem that may in power for years to come? Maybe they held their nose and voted Biden, but Harris presents a different set of challenges.

If they're embarrassed by what their party has become, if they feel any responsibility for having brought it there, I suspect the coming election is going to be a genuine moral dilemma for many of them.
 
Beelzebuddy said:
He's from Indiana, though. Why would he need to spend a decade being a senator from a state he's never lived in?
Click to expand...

Because he'll never get elected to statewide office in Indiana. Why did HRC become a senator for NY?
 
ahhell said:
A. I don't especially like the discourse about the Prestige, seems a bit snippy. But who cares what I think.
Click to expand...
It really isn't about Prestige. It's about reasoning and honest arguing.
ahhell said:
B. Buttigieg. I heard an interesting analysis of him as a possible running mate. He's basically a living shibboleth of the college educated elite lefty and will bring no votes that Harris is not already getting. I'm curious because I like Buttigieg but I also agree, not a great choice for the VP because he doesn't bring anything to the table Harris doesn't already have. Same for Newsom, though my feeling is Newsom actually brings more negatives than Buttigieg.

I'd like Buttigieg to run for the senate in NY or CA have a 10 ish years there then run for the POTUS.
Click to expand...

Well, he is certainly more likely to win a State wide election in CA or NY than Indiana.
 
acbytesla said:
Because she moved there with Bill after they left the White House.
Click to expand...
Why move to NY? Because they have a history of electing carpet baggers as a steppingstone to run for the presidency. Any rate, supports my argument that Buttigieg should move to New York because his husband wants to and then run for the Senate.
 
thaiboxerken said:
It's not about Trump, it's about Project 2024. White nationalism is appealing to some.
Click to expand...

Project 2035 is much more than race. It is the most blatantly stupid power grab in history. Its plans for science and energy is a gift to the buggy whip purveyors. Imagine if the US government outlawed cars when most travel was horse and buggy.
 
Ryan O'Dine said:
I think Harris presents a unique make-or-break for non-MAGA Republicans. How can they vote for a California Democrat? How a "DEI hire"? Can they help elect a Dem that may in power for years to come? Maybe they held their nose and voted Biden, but Harris presents a different set of challenges.

If they're embarrassed by what their party has become, if they feel any responsibility for having brought it there, I suspect the coming election is going to be a genuine moral dilemma for many of them.
Click to expand...
The racists (those who would have sat out the election under Biden but will vote for Trump against Harris) are a real demographic whose size we don't have a good estimate for yet, but I don't think the contrarians' behavior will shift that much. Oh they'll say that would've voted for Biden, but I'm sure if Biden was still running that they'd have said they would've voted for someone younger instead.
 
ahhell said:
Why move to NY? Because they have a history of electing carpet baggers as a steppingstone to run for the presidency. Any rate, supports my argument that Buttigieg should move to New York because his husband wants to and then run for the Senate.
Click to expand...

Are you kidding? It goes on in almost every state. Alabama Senator Tommy Tuberville didn't live in Alabama when he was elected. He lived in Florida. Herschel Walker didn't live in Georgia when he ran for the Senate there. He lived in Texas. Buttigieg can go anywhere
 
Yes, but ahhell's argument is that to be qualified for the presidency Buttigieg first needs to go off and be Senator Carpetbagger for a decade, which will help him somehow despite the scornful way ahhell describes the process. After all, doing the same thing and waiting patiently until it was her turn worked so well for Hillary Clinton.

On topic, I'd just like to mention that whoever is doing the Harris campaign's press releases has been hitting it out of the park.
 
Last edited:
Apparently, qualifications only apply to Democratic candidates. Agree all, Trump has zero qualifications and the Republicans didn't care.
 
Beelzebuddy said:
The racists (those who would have sat out the election under Biden but will vote for Trump against Harris) are a real demographic whose size we don't have a good estimate for yet, but I don't think the contrarians' behavior will shift that much. Oh they'll say that would've voted for Biden, but I'm sure if Biden was still running that they'd have said they would've voted for someone younger instead.
Click to expand...

i think that’s exactly what happened. biden was too old but he stepped down and now harris is too, well you know what she’s too, so it goes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom