• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Kamala Harris Election Campaign

I admit it's a tough choice. The career criminal, or the career criminal protected by the political establishment. As long as insider trading is legal for Congress, I make no distinction between Trump and his peers in high elected office in this country.

Also you hate me, and think I'm too stupid to have a vote, and if you had your way I wouldn't. So I feel no special urge to elect your favorite corruptocrat just because they're your favorite.

Care to explain how Harris is a career criminal?

And we both know just how strong your moral principles are, don't we?
 
Last edited:
I admit it's a tough choice. The career criminal, or the career criminal protected by the political establishment. As long as insider trading is legal for Congress, I make no distinction between Trump and his peers in high elected office in this country.

Also you hate me, and think I'm too stupid to have a vote, and if you had your way I wouldn't. So I feel no special urge to elect your favorite corruptocrat just because they're your favorite.

I neither hate you or think you are stupid. Not even close.

I do find it interesting that you work up this animus for every Democrat to justify your reluctant support of a career criminal. Your accusation or your rationalization is not intellectually honest. And as I said, I don't think you this is because of any lack of intellect on your part. I think you're compromising to justify a life long support of the GOP.

I fully agree that insider trading in Congress plus many other perks that effectively make democracy for sale should end. Never mind that such initiatives are usually supported by half the Democrats in Congress and are opposed almost unanimously by Republicans.

Have you read Project 2025? Or are you aware that Trump openly offered favorable laws to the Fossil Fuels industry for a billion dollars?

I have little doubt that Harris necessarily courts industries, unions and special interests to back her. But it's a whole new ballgame when someone openly offers a quid pro quo.
 
Care to explain how Harris is a career criminal?

And we both know just how strong your moral principles are, don't we?

A career in politics is a a career in criminality. Again: It's legal for legislators to engage in insider trading. Do you think this is a good thing? Did you ever vote for it? Kamala Harris was a Senator. Did she ever speak out against it? Do you believe that as president she will take a public stand against this unethical nonsense?

No. You're just hoping her brand of grift will win out against another brand of grift. If we're voting for grift, then I'm voting against the jackasses who keep lying to me about how their grift isn't a grift.
 
A career in politics is a a career in criminality. Again: It's legal for legislators to engage in insider trading. Do you think this is a good thing? Did you ever vote for it? Kamala Harris was a Senator. Did she ever speak out against it? Do you believe that as president she will take a public stand against this unethical nonsense?

No. You're just hoping her brand of grift will win out against another brand of grift. If we're voting for grift, then I'm voting against the jackasses who keep lying to me about how their grift isn't a grift.

It's really a stretch to say that 4 years as a Senator makes anyone a career criminal. The rest of her so called political career were her positions as District Attorney for San Francisco and California State Attorney General.

And the idea that she did any trading on insider information is not backed up by financial disclosures.

“For me, it was quite refreshing that it appears to be very passive,” said Dustin Thackeray, a chartered financial analyst and chief investment officer at Crewe Advisors in Salt Lake City, who reviewed Harris’ disclosure.

“She’s definitely not attempting to trade on any inside type of information,” Thackeray said.

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/26/wha...disclosure-reveals-about-her-investments.html

So basically, you decided to slam her based off nothing at all.

In contrast, there were 94 criminal indictments against Trump. And he was convicted on over 30 counts of criminal fraud which would have been greater except for the Statute of Limitations. His company as well was found guilty of multiple counts of criminal fraud and his CFO went to prison twice for perjury. His attorney also went to prison because he lied for Trump to Congress.

But Kamala Harris is the career criminal. Yeah, that makes sense.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Yay, theprestige has found his point of disagreement in the thread to justify to himself his anti-social behaviour. We can move on now.
 
Yay, theprestige has found his point of disagreement in the thread to justify to himself his anti-social behaviour. We can move on now.

While I do disagree with Prestige on most everything. He is not usually not anti-social. And I wouldn't characterize this as anti-social.

But this latest post demonstrates a dishonest comparison between Trump and Harris. As well as a phony attempt of whataboutism.
 
Also you hate me, and think I'm too stupid to have a vote, and if you had your way I wouldn't. So I feel no special urge to elect your favorite corruptocrat just because they're your favorite.
If I had my way I'd make it mandatory for you to vote. And not because I hate you or because I think you're stupid (I don't), but because every citizen has a civic duty to participate in the democratic process.
 
I admit it's a tough choice. The career criminal, or the career criminal protected by the political establishment. As long as insider trading is legal for Congress, I make no distinction between Trump and his peers in high elected office in this country.

Also you hate me, and think I'm too stupid to have a vote, and if you had your way I wouldn't. So I feel no special urge to elect your favorite corruptocrat just because they're your favorite.

so, cutting off your nose to show those libtards ?

in recent years we have seen so many cases of corrupt Democrats getting kicked out of the Party and then prosecuted, and so many corrupt Republicans being protected and elected.

If you actually cared about corruption, the choice would be clear.
 
Last edited:
Kamala's secret weapon for millennial and GenZ voters.

Three words:

Topless Model Stepdaughter
For someone described as a "topless model", she sure keeps her insta pretty tame. It's mostly her knitting, which is superb, by the way.

I suspect she's being labelled as a "topless model" because once years ago she did a bit of a racy shoot. It's not really a fair label.
 
The word of the day from the Democrats is "weird."

Pete Buttigieg:

It is not just a weird style that he brings. This leads to weird policies, like his proposal that the number of votes you get in an election would be different depending on how many kids you have.

Tim Walz (Minnesota Gov):

These are weird people.

The Harris campaign itself:

One release in particular, sent out on Thursday, caught the attention of social media users after describing Donald Trump as, among other things, “old and quite weird.”

Not sure how well it will work, but it's a good idea to try, and if it does seem to catch on it's not hard to imagine Kamala's VP doing a call and response on the opposing ticket:

VP Candidate: Donald Trump is so weird:

(Crowd): How weird is he?

So far the Harris people seem nimble and smart; the contrast to the somnolent Biden campaign is pretty stark.
 
Last edited:
The word of the day from the Democrats is "weird."

Pete Buttigieg:



Tim Walz (Minnesota Gov):



The Harris campaign itself:



Not sure how well it will work, but it's a good idea to try, and if it does seem to catch on it's not hard to imagine Kamala's VP doing a call and response on the opposing ticket:

VP Candidate: Donald Trump is so weird:

(Crowd): How weird is he?

So far the Harris people seem nimble and smart; the contrast to the somnolent Biden campaign is pretty stark.

Yes. I think she is taking her previous claim to be the Anti Trump to heart and embracing short, memorable ideas, "Weird Don" might be something he'd use
 
I've also seen creepy.

Creepy Donald would also work. Although I think weird probably works better, because it reminds of the creepy stuff, but also his disconnect from reality
 
For someone described as a "topless model", she sure keeps her insta pretty tame. It's mostly her knitting, which is superb, by the way.

I suspect she's being labelled as a "topless model" because once years ago she did a bit of a racy shoot. It's not really a fair label.

And even if she was? Who cares? I'm always amazed at the US obsession with what consenting adults do or not do and how that somehow is of importance when electing someone to office.
 

Back
Top Bottom