...
I remember the excitement even in Australia when Tony Blair was elected. All I’m detecting now is shrug of the shoulders.
Your detectorometer needs recalibrating, big time.
...
I remember the excitement even in Australia when Tony Blair was elected. All I’m detecting now is shrug of the shoulders.
You must be joking.
I seem to remember that the UK military wasn't keen on National Service even in the height of the Cold War.
And I'm not sure what 700,000 poorly motivated and trained 18 year olds, who couldn't politically be sent on active sevice unless there was WWIII would do much for the capabilities of the armed forces, except eating into their budget
What makes your comment hilarious is I remember Blair being accused of much the same before 1997, of abandoning Labour priniciples and basically being just 'Tory-lite'.
I was aware of those and Michael Green. But not Richard Wharton or Dr JML Richards until this evening
It's pathetic. Parliament is effectively prorogued and here is the Prime Minister announcing a new policy which he is supposed to do in front of the Speaker of the House as a matter of courtesy and protocol. It is also on a Bank Holiday weekend when Saturday night turns into Sunday. It's completely nuts. As Robert Peston points out, how can 'volunteering at weekends' equate to 'mandatory'.
Blair became electable. But he was identifiably Labour. Starmer is not in my view.
Look, I’m Labor/Labour in my blood. But I can still be disappointed in the leaders they put up.
Well you can certainly claim that but when you are pushing a pro-Tory line forgive me for being skeptical.
Rishi says the National Service plan will cost £2.5 billion a year.
Cost of compulsory national service: £2.5bn a year.
The fost of pay the rise for junior doctors that Rishi said is unaffordable is under £2bn a year.
Fortunately we will never know what exemptions there would have been if this half witted government had stayed in power long enough to enact this half witted idea.
You're right. Unless it's a manifesto pledge even if they win the election, they'll quietly drop it.
What makes you think they'll carry out their manifesto pledges if elected?
Good point
I'm sure our understaffed armed forces will be delighted to receive hundreds of thousands of unenthusiastic recruits every year and our criminal classes will benefit from military training and access to weapons.![]()
You're right. Unless it's a manifesto pledge even if they win the election, they'll quietly drop it.
It seems that Conservatives are pining for National Service that most of them are too young to have done.
Talking to Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips, Home Secretary James Cleverly said: "There's going to be no criminal sanctions, nobody's going to jail over this."
He added that "nobody will be compelled to do the military element" but said those who do will be paid - while those who choose to volunteer will not be paid.
He didn't say how they would be compelled to participate or what sanctions there would be for refusing.
Hardly mandatory is it?
They seem to be walking it back already.