It's hard to say, but based on the WaPo article I just read (Marc Polymeropoulos linked to it in a tweet), I assume it must be something like this:
What exactly does this mean, "places where Havana syndrome struck"? Countries, states, cities, streets, blocks? Or would it be places where somebody suspected of being a Russian spy may have been spotted - like in the case of the American nurse and the thin, blonde and well-dressed young man?
That is surprising! Weren't the embassy employees in Havana the original cohort? Was their commonality really that their work history was on Russia rather than on Cuban issues?
But isn't that also true of the DoD? Are WaPo (and CBS, Der Spiegel, etc.) unaware that the DoD "“has been experimenting with exactly the kind of weaponized technology” experts suggest is a plausible cause"??! Is it possible that they never heard about the DoD ferret-brain studies? US government is trying to give ferrets Havana Syndrome to figure out what mystery illness is (Independent, Mar 10, 2023)
Even though the following was what the ODNI report was based on, the media pretends that it never happened and still needs to be done:
It appears to be one of those cases where new investigations will be required again and again and again because the previous ones didn't come up with the desired result! As WaPo puts it:
The 'earlier' conclusion linked to by WaPo is actually brand new:
Moreover, the Insider reported, geolocation data shows that operators attached to Unit 29155, traveling undercover, were present in places where Havana syndrome struck, just before the incidents took place.
Opinion: ‘Havana syndrome’ might have been a Russian attack. The U.S. can’t stop investigating. (Washington Post Editorial Board, April 1, 2024)
What exactly does this mean, "places where Havana syndrome struck"? Countries, states, cities, streets, blocks? Or would it be places where somebody suspected of being a Russian spy may have been spotted - like in the case of the American nurse and the thin, blonde and well-dressed young man?
Even more concerning, the investigation found that a commonality among the Americans targeted was their work history on Russia issues.
That is surprising! Weren't the embassy employees in Havana the original cohort? Was their commonality really that their work history was on Russia rather than on Cuban issues?
It identifies the possible culprit as Unit 29155, a “notorious assassination and sabotage squad” of the GRU, Moscow’s military intelligence service. Senior members of the unit received “awards and political promotions for work related to the development of ‘non-lethal acoustic weapons’” — a term used in the Russian military-scientific literature to describe both sound- and radiofrequency-based directed energy devices. The investigation found documentary evidence that Unit 29155 “has been experimenting with exactly the kind of weaponized technology” experts suggest is a plausible cause.
But isn't that also true of the DoD? Are WaPo (and CBS, Der Spiegel, etc.) unaware that the DoD "“has been experimenting with exactly the kind of weaponized technology” experts suggest is a plausible cause"??! Is it possible that they never heard about the DoD ferret-brain studies? US government is trying to give ferrets Havana Syndrome to figure out what mystery illness is (Independent, Mar 10, 2023)
Even though the following was what the ODNI report was based on, the media pretends that it never happened and still needs to be done:
The U.S. intelligence community needs to conduct a full, aggressive inquiry that takes into account all aspects of the incidents — sometimes easier said than done in such investigations. It must include everything: counterintelligence information, case investigatory data, clinical data, and possible concepts of operation for the attacks based on plausible mechanisms and devices identified by earlier research. It needs access to all the available intelligence — including anything previously buried or ignored — and be unbound by preconceived notions about what happened.
It appears to be one of those cases where new investigations will be required again and again and again because the previous ones didn't come up with the desired result! As WaPo puts it:
Earlier, agencies in the U.S. intelligence community had concluded that “it is very unlikely a foreign adversary is responsible.” They need to look again.
The 'earlier' conclusion linked to by WaPo is actually brand new:
Anomalous Health Incidents
We continue to closely examine anomalous health incidents (AHIs), particularly in areas we have identified as requiring additional research and analysis. Most IC agencies have concluded that it is very unlikely a foreign adversary is responsible for the reported AHIs. IC agencies have varying confidence levels because we still have gaps given the challenges collecting on foreign adversaries—as we do on many issues involving them. As part of its review, the IC identified critical assumptions surrounding the initial AHIs reported in Cuba from 2016 to 2018, which framed the IC’s understanding of this phenomenon, but were not borne out by subsequent medical and technical analysis. In light of this and the evidence that points away from a foreign adversary, causal mechanism, or unique syndromes linked to AHIs, IC agencies assess those symptoms reported by U.S. personnel probably were the result of factors that did not involve a foreign adversary.
Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community (Office of the Director of National Intelligence - USA, Feb 5, 2024)
