MarkCorrigan
Героям слава!
Samson why do you run away from questions and not answer them?
SamsonPossibly Sampson has, again, been drowning his sorrows at the non-martyrdom of Rowling.
I guess because I can't keep up. I am quite serious in my world view, but just one finger, a clever phone, and a day job.Samson why do you run away from questions and not answer them?
That's been on the cards for years. The moderates are decamping to Alliance, the unionist centre to the UUP or PUP, depending on degree of social/fiscal liberalism and the Paisleyites to the TUV.
I guess because I can't keep up. I am quite serious in my world view, but just one finger, a clever phone, and a day job.
Of course you are at work.I'm the same. I'm literally at work right now.
I suspect its because you can't answer them.
What does this gibberish have to do with...Well anything really?Of course you are at work.
And you are not fearful of anyone. You are a man. You are a western man. Even if a Muslim you will not be fearful but your name gainsays that notion.
However.
We are in a world where women are being screwed right good and proper everywhere. In Afghanistan.
Would you choose to be born a woman in Afghanistan right now?
Would you join a lesbian dating app in your country?
You are so lucky.
More gibberings. Do you actually understand English?The plebiscite is called upon from time to time to correct mistakes.
Humza Yousaf will be corrected after wrecking Scottish enlightenment paradigms.
I know you will just love Katie Hopkins.
She gets to the point that I thought was obvious late in this
https://youtu.be/Dnkc7rCp6ys?si=Cy3_OQbprr9GBmfy
Don't mention it.
Well I posted a standard definition of 'plebiscite' and he still can't manage to use the word correctly.Quite.
And I posted a link to a standard, commonly accepted definition of Islamism.
Samson continues do perform as Humpty Dumpty...
Samson
Eh....., no.Alliance themselves are in a spot of bother. They're functionally a unionist party (despite their objections) who are dependent on nationalist votes and transfers for seats. They're fast approaching their **** or get off the pot moment and their leaders will not like the way they have to jump.
Ben Habib says there's no appetite for a Labour government and that polls predicting a huge Labour victory is largely due to Tory voters switching to Reform UK or not voting.
I know you will just love Katie Hopkins.
She gets to the point that I thought was obvious late in this
https://youtu.be/Dnkc7rCp6ys?si=Cy3_OQbprr9GBmfy
Don't mention it.
Are they largely brown skinned?
https://x.com/DanKaszeta/status/1222881578050822147?s=20
Followed by
The Metro picked up his thread, and because the headline was a bit sarcastic, some of the conspiracy theorists tweet the article back at him.
https://metro.co.uk/2018/02/05/fear...e-venturing-london-sharia-no-go-zone-7288616/
I guess it could be argued she took a risk for the team, in that there was a non zero chance the police would interpret the new law in the way trans right activists wanted.
I just peaked into the thread on the other forum I belong to which is devoted to painting Rowling as the devil incarnate, and they're incandescent about it.
Pointing this sort of thing out is pedantic, but not petty.
We are communicating through the medium of the written word in the English language.
When we use the wrong word, or use a word wrongly then our communication becomes inefficient and liable to misinterpretation or dismissal.
Weather we like it or knot, when mistakes happen (be they homophobes, miss spelt, just plane rong or whoever) it becomes harder too pass the poster's meaning, and watt could be illegitimate (or Atlee's undressing) points of view get lost in deciduous jalopy.
Tomatillo, it geronticide bin?
Clearly.
I guess because I can't keep up. I am quite serious in my world view, but just one finger, a clever phone, and a day job.
1Aggravation of offences by prejudice
(1)An offence is aggravated by prejudice if—
(a)where there is a specific victim of the offence—
(i)at the time of committing the offence, or immediately before or after doing so, the offender demonstrates malice and ill-will towards the victim, and
(ii)the malice and ill-will is based on the victim's membership or presumed membership of a group defined by reference to a characteristic mentioned in subsection (2), or
(b)whether or not there is a specific victim of the offence, the offence is motivated (wholly or partly) by malice and ill-will towards a group of persons based on the group being defined by reference to a characteristic mentioned in subsection (2).
(2)The characteristics are—
(a)age,
(b)disability,
(c)race, colour, nationality (including citizenship), or ethnic or national origins,
(d)religion or, in the case of a social or cultural group, perceived religious affiliation,
(e)sexual orientation,
(f)transgender identity,
(g)variations in sex characteristics.