• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: General UK Politics V Suella Strikes Back

Status
Not open for further replies.
wobs said:
Maybe I'm missing something here, but what has New Zealand got to do with Yousaf?
Click to expand...
New Zealand is a colony the exact population of Yousaf's dominion.
I am of Scottish descent so have a marginal interest.
 
Samson said:
I take a keen interest in all this, and I understand your interpretation.
There are valid views that
1. The law poses no threat to those that correctly sex individuals on the internet and to their person.
2. That the polis are the arbiters and will decide whether to confiscate devices and record non crime hate incidents.
Click to expand...

Not my interpretation, the interpretation of the supreme court.
 
Again samson, your sources are lying to you, but you won't accept it because they tell you what you want to hear.

He's not an islamist. He's just a Muslim.
 
Darat said:
No he was first of all voted as the leader of his party. He was then voted for by the representatives of the people. There was nothing inherited.
Click to expand...
The representatives of the people seldom get traction when the plebiscite has their say.
That is in New Zealand, I think maybe Boris Johnson made the cut, a kind of curious study.
 
Samson said:
I have had the interest to watch this closely, and I hold the view she took one for the team. The team is articulate women who post fearlessly on X.
Click to expand...
Bollocks. More like you and you fellow transphobes.

Samson said:
Actually wrong, the team is the common plebiscite, those who see a Trojan horse to criminalizing those that see the prophet Mohammed as an evil pedophile.
Click to expand...
What is this nonsense supposed to mean?
 
catsmate said:
Indeed. I believe Sampson has found a new word ('plebiscite'), doesn't understand it, but feels the urge to insert it into sentences.
Click to expand...

Honestly sometimes it feels like we're arguing against a child. The repetition, the misuse of words, the regular word salad, the stubborn insistence in only listening to sources that agree with him and being shocked when it turns out these sources are usually disgusting people...
 
catsmate said:
Indeed. I believe Sampson has found a new word ('plebiscite'), doesn't understand it, but feels the urge to insert it into sentences.
Click to expand...

Is Readers Digest still going? Maybe it's from their 'It Pays to Increase Your Word Power', or something...
 
Samson said:
Plebiscite is the voter in a western democracy, he says from memory.
Click to expand...

MarkCorrigan said:
He says wrongly, in a way that's barely coherent.
Click to expand...


Pointing this sort of thing out is pedantic, but not petty.

We are communicating through the medium of the written word in the English language.

When we use the wrong word, or use a word wrongly then our communication becomes inefficient and liable to misinterpretation or dismissal.

Weather we like it or knot, when mistakes happen (be they homophobes, miss spelt, just plane rong or whoever) it becomes harder too pass the poster's meaning, and watt could be illegitimate (or Atlee's undressing) points of view get lost in deciduous jalopy.

Tomatillo, it geronticide bin?

Clearly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom