• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: General UK Politics V Suella Strikes Back

Status
Not open for further replies.
Surrey is not in Scotland.
That is a detail, should JK Rowling expect arrest, should the possibility even be a twinkle in anyone's eye, or is netting a few transphobes as bycatch legitimate?
 
Farage says he won't go to church anymore because it has surrendered to the woke agenda.
 
Details are kinda important, especially when discussing the law.
Ok sure, but the substantial question is, should JK Rowling be arrested on April 1 because of the new law?
Is this good that a British women's rights activist be captured by a law designed by a man from a deeply mysoginist religion?
 
And this is why I am an absolutestist when it comes to free speech. You can always twist the laws to go after your political opponents.
 
Ok sure, but the substantial question is, should JK Rowling be arrested on April 1 because of the new law?
Is this good that a British women's rights activist be captured by a law designed by a man from a deeply mysoginist religion?

If she breaks the law, then yes.
Is it good that a deeply transphobic millionaire should be exempt from a law passed by a democratically elected government?
 
If she breaks the law, then yes.
Is it good that a deeply transphobic millionaire should be exempt from a law passed by a democratically elected government?
Saints alive, that is an incredibly dangerous post.
 
My speech is dangerous? The irony hits like a ******* sledgehammer.
No doubt this mainly echo chamber will pile in, reminding me I am a racist transphobe and Islamophobe. I dispute the first two, but would be wasting time explaining.

For my part, I am an enthusiast for western culture. You
and your cohort risk leaving it all behind in favour of this dangerous Islamic Scottish lunatic.
 
Saints alive, that is an incredibly dangerous post.

More unsubstantiated gibberish.

Again, your sources are lying to you samson. You just don't want to hear it because it disturbs your child's-crayon-drawing view of the world.
 
No doubt this mainly echo chamber will pile in, reminding me I am a racist transphobe and Islamophobe. I dispute the first two, but would be wasting time explaining.

For my part, I am an enthusiast for western culture. You
and your cohort risk leaving it all behind in favour of this dangerous Islamic Scottish lunatic.

Evidence he is dangerous? No, your racist dribbling won't do as evidence.
 
No doubt this mainly echo chamber will pile in, reminding me I am a racist transphobe and Islamophobe. I dispute the first two, but would be wasting time explaining.

For my part, I am an enthusiast for western culture. You
and your cohort risk leaving it all behind in favour of this dangerous Islamic Scottish lunatic.

You do post some very silly things.
 
Odd that you so rarely post in History, Literature, and the Arts, isn't it?
My main interest at the moment is finding why the west is abandoning the teaching of those subjects to children in favour of critical race, gender, and so on. That is a political matter, and this Scottish Law is fundamentally opposed to those sub forums existing. JK Rowling is sometimes described as a skilled writer, but Junkshop wants her jailed if you follow the logic of the thread. The fact we could be discussing this enrages many ex lefties.
 
My main interest at the moment is finding why the west is abandoning the teaching of those subjects to children in favour of critical race, gender, and so on. That is a political matter, and this Scottish Law is fundamentally opposed to those sub forums existing. JK Rowling is sometimes described as a skilled writer, but Junkshop wants her jailed if you follow the logic of the thread. The fact we could be discussing this enrages many ex lefties.
More racist and transphobic word salad.

Just absolutely worthless waffle with no substance. It's exactly an old man whining that the damn uppity slurs don't know their place anymore.

You barely ever support your arguments with facts, just throwing scary sounding rubbish out there, like the recent time you tried to make out that the British population had a high level of Muslims in it despite them being less than 5% of the population. But you found what you thought was a scary sounding statistic about them.

It would be amusing if it wasn't so pathetic.
 
I am curious, why are you attracted to the use of words like dribbling? I post in good faith, and avoid perjorative terms for other posters.
Two reasons.

First because you post barely coherent gibberish most of the time. Sometimes we actually have to try to work out what the hell it is you're talking about

Secondly you've admitted to only looking up sources that agree with what you think and the way you present them speaks less of someone putting forward their ideas with support and someone producing the places that have told him how to think.

You seem wholly incapable of holding an actual discussion. I'm not kidding.
 
...JK Rowling is sometimes described as a skilled writer, but Junkshop wants her jailed...

I don't recall commenting on Rowling's literary abilities, but for the record: I think she's a competent, if somewhat clunky writer. I would never describe her as 'skilled', but that's just my opinion, and matters not a jot.

As to whether I want her jailed? No, I don't want her jailed, I'd much rather she and her bigotry just faded into obscurity. I don't think that her fame and/or wealth should put her above the law. By all means do all that is within your power to change the law if you think it's wrong, but while it remains the law, then it must be applied equally.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom