Merged 2024 Election Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
To poke at the other potential usage here of "One cannot rewrite History by altering or erasing it" and the more general attempted argument - "Fake News" has long been well identified to have two particular features of relevance to ChrisBRFPKY's attempted larger argument.

First, the one that he's effectively relying upon. False, misleading, and distorted for some purpose information is something that appears across the political spectrum and neither more mainstream news nor people in general are completely immune to it. There is indeed both left-wing and right-wing fake news that gets believed and spread. ChrisBRFPKY sure looks like he's gone a little further than both-siderism, though, in how he's effectively tried to imply that it's just the left that is susceptible to fake news, even if he hasn't explicitly argued that. It's a little telling, though, that he chose what he did as an example. ChrisBRFPKY has a point when it comes to the "very fine people" comment being taken out of the immediate context. Even that, though, is a superficial and misleading point when it comes to the larger context of Trump aiding, abetting, and emboldening white supremacists in practice and making it plenty clear that he considered them "his people," which is why it had and continues to have persuasive power on the subject. It's a pretty crappy example to use to demonstrate that people were actually meaningfully fooled by "fake news," but it's an easy thing to latch onto for those who are only looking for some straw to grasp.

The second, which ChrisBRFPKY hasn't so much as come close to acknowledging, is that in study after study after study, believing and spreading fake news is much, much more of a problem when it comes to those on the right-wing. Further, such right-wing fake news has actively and increasingly been influencing Republican policy and politics. A bunch of these things are ridiculous, of course, such as the crap like "Kitty litter is being put into schools by woke people so that furries can be respected (blegh!) and go to the bathroom with it (horrifying)!" Yeah, no. Kitty litter was being put into some schools, yes, but as an emergency measure in case of school shootings, a problem for which the extremist right-wing bears overwhelming responsibility. But then, the overwhelming share of "Anti-Woke" complaints tend to be unmitigated horse pucky on actual examination and often attempts to blame the "left" for problems that those on the "right" caused with their irresponsibility.

Going a bit further when it comes to the Presidential candidates, Trump, himself, has perhaps been the greatest single source for disinformation and fake news, period. His election lies (which swayed most Republicans in fair part because of a long running Republican fake news campaign) and coronavirus lies (he was the "single largest driver of coronavirus misinformation"), in particular, were egregious, let alone the nigh constant stream of various BS that he's been pushing all along.

If "Fake News" was actually ChrisBRFPWY's concern, he'd not be supporting Trump. He's well aware that it's an issue that people like us do care about, though, hence why he's tried the tactic that he did.
 
Last edited:
I find it ironic/hypocritical that the same people who claim taking down Confederate monuments is 'erasing history' are the same people who have no problem with FL's teaching standard that “slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit.” Talk about erasing history...

A monument is not history, it's a glorification of a particular person or event. Tragic Monkey put it beautifully in a previous post.

"[SB148] would ban mandated lessons or workplace trainings that could cause individuals to experience discomfort, guilt or another form of “psychological distress” based on actions committed in the past by members of the same race, color, sex or national origin."

Ya know, sometimes we should experience discomfort, guilt, or "psychological distress" about what was done in the past. It's how we learn they were wrong and not to repeat them. And they call Democrats "snowflakes". sheesh
 
I struggle to thread the needle between someone being comfortable hanging out with white supremacists and also being a “very fine” person. Who is that person?


"This is where the party ends
I'll just sit here wondering how you
Can stand by your racist friend
I know politics bore you
But I feel like a hypocrite talking to you
You and your racist friend"

-They Might Be Giants
 
"This is where the party ends
I'll just sit here wondering how you
Can stand by your racist friend
I know politics bore you
But I feel like a hypocrite talking to you
You and your racist friend"

-They Might Be Giants

You are known by the company you keep.

Birds of a feather flock together.
 
Son of OathKeeper runs as a Democrat.

https://apnews.com/article/e0b46f25dfe319afe29617fd7325eb10

KALISPELL, Mont. (AP) — The eldest son of one of America’s most infamous seditionists is building a new life since breaking free from his father’s control — juggling work, college classes and volunteer firefighting.

And Dakota Adams has tossed one more ball in the air this year: a Democratic campaign for Montana’s Legislature.

He also plans to sell the rifles, body armor and tactical gear he used to wear to anti-government protests alongside his father — Stewart Rhodes, founder of the Oath Keepers. It’s all part of an effort to push away the last vestiges of what Adams describes as an isolating and abusive upbringing that nearly ruined him, his mother and his siblings.

“I decided that I’m going to double down on betting on the electoral process,” Adams said in a recent interview.
 
I find it ironic/hypocritical that the same people who claim taking down Confederate monuments is 'erasing history' are the same people who have no problem with FL's teaching standard that “slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit.” Talk about erasing history...

Related to that...

Florida Board fails hilariously at proving "Slavery taught skills"

Really short version, the people who wrote that standard put out a list of examples and nearly all the examples were either never slaves or never held the claimed jobs. It just gets worse from there. Talk about fake news!

Including George Washington’s white slave-owner sister in their list of skilled people who learned their skills as slaves and benefited from that was particularly WTF? One doesn't even need to get to things like how horrific the argument is for what it neglects, it's a total farce even with a quick check at how absurdly inane the case made for it is from the start!
 
Last edited:
"This is where the party ends
I'll just sit here wondering how you
Can stand by your racist friend
I know politics bore you
But I feel like a hypocrite talking to you
You and your racist friend"

-They Might Be Giants

Can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding.
 
Presidential candidates are apparently well known to voters. Or....some just made up their minds based on a few election platform items. "Foreigners."
We find that televised broadcast campaign advertising matters up and down the ballot, but it has much larger e↵ects in down-ballot elections than in presidential elections. Using survey and voter registration data from multiple election cycles, we also show that the primary mechanism for ad e↵ects is persuasion, not the mobilization of partisans. Our results have implications for the study of campaigns and elections as well as voter decisionmaking and information-processing.

. In presidential general elections, the persuasive impact of television advertising appears to be larger than the impact of other electioneering, such as canvassing or mail, whose impact is quite small, even zero (Kalla and Broockman 2018). But there are significant limitations to what we know about the e↵ects of televised campaign advertising on election outcomes. Most importantly, the extant literature is almost entirely focused on presidential general elections.
pdf
http://chriswarshaw.com/papers/advertising.pdf
 
As an example I would submit the current destruction of Gaza and Ukraine. Surely we can agree war is wrong. To allow war is wrong. Yet this never ending wars theme among Democrats seems to survive. How is that possible? Why do you support funding foreign wars or US participation? Wouldn't peace be better? That alone is reason to vote for Trump against Biden.

This again?

Advocating for a short, false peace and victory to those who seek to commit genocide and sow chaos is not some morally upright position. It's irresponsible and will make things worse.

ETA: To add an old adage here, though, the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing.
 
Last edited:
To poke at the other potential usage here of "One cannot rewrite History by altering or erasing it" and the more general attempted argument - "Fake News" has long been well identified to have two particular features of relevance to ChrisBRFPKY's attempted larger argument.

First, the one that he's effectively relying upon. False, misleading, and distorted for some purpose information is something that appears across the political spectrum and neither more mainstream news nor people in general are completely immune to it. There is indeed both left-wing and right-wing fake news that gets believed and spread. ChrisBRFPKY sure looks like he's gone a little further than both-siderism, though, in how he's effectively tried to imply that it's just the left that is susceptible to fake news, even if he hasn't explicitly argued that. It's a little telling, though, that he chose what he did as an example. ChrisBRFPKY has a point when it comes to the "very fine people" comment being taken out of the immediate context. Even that, though, is a superficial and misleading point when it comes to the larger context of Trump aiding, abetting, and emboldening white supremacists in practice and making it plenty clear that he considered them "his people," which is why it had and continues to have persuasive power on the subject. It's a pretty crappy example to use to demonstrate that people were actually meaningfully fooled by "fake news," but it's an easy thing to latch onto for those who are only looking for some straw to grasp.

The second, which ChrisBRFPKY hasn't so much as come close to acknowledging, is that in study after study after study, believing and spreading fake news is much, much more of a problem when it comes to those on the right-wing. Further, such right-wing fake news has actively and increasingly been influencing Republican policy and politics. A bunch of these things are ridiculous, of course, such as the crap like "Kitty litter is being put into schools by woke people so that furries can be respected (blegh!) and go to the bathroom with it (horrifying)!" Yeah, no. Kitty litter was being put into some schools, yes, but as an emergency measure in case of school shootings, a problem for which the extremist right-wing bears overwhelming responsibility. But then, the overwhelming share of "Anti-Woke" complaints tend to be unmitigated horse pucky on actual examination and often attempts to blame the "left" for problems that those on the "right" caused with their irresponsibility.

Going a bit further when it comes to the Presidential candidates, Trump, himself, has perhaps been the greatest single source for disinformation and fake news, period. His election lies (which swayed most Republicans in fair part because of a long running Republican fake news campaign) and coronavirus lies (he was the "single largest driver of coronavirus misinformation"), in particular, were egregious, let alone the nigh constant stream of various BS that he's been pushing all along.

If "Fake News" was actually ChrisBRFPWY's concern, he'd not be supporting Trump. He's well aware that it's an issue that people like us do care about, though, hence why he's tried the tactic that he did.

Very Lucid response. I've not made a distinction between any "side" using fake news. Fake news is just that, no matter how you slice it. Please feel free to point out any fake news the right has pushed about Biden. I'll be happy to discuss my opinions. So there's that.

It's a bit dishonest to blame Trump for Coronavirus. It was a pandemic that shook the World, and still is to a smaller degree. If you're to be honest, you'll admit the majority of Trump hating press worked overtime to misrepresent Trump's statements to their Trump hating audience. The press briefings became unbearable to watch for that reason IMO. About the only thing I learned from the daily press conferences was that the press was seething with hatred for Trump.

Regarding honesty of what Presidents or political candidates say. It's difficult to argue any political candidate is honest and has never lied. Most like myself, tend to view the results achieved rather than the candidate's truthfulness. You can't say Biden has never lied, in fact his being caught in a big lie ended one of his attempts at a run for President several years ago.

If Biden has done a good job on the economy, inflation and the border, 2024 should be an easy win. If not, Trump may be elected even if from a prison cell.
 
We can only vote to end a war we ourselves have started, but that would never happen because it would mean voting to lose. Someone else attacking someone else? Isolationism and noninterference means siding with the attacker.

The pandemic was such an easy victory for Trump, all he had to do was get out of the way and let the experts deal with it. But no, he had to be involved in every bit of it and that meant it was an attack on him personally.
 
Last edited:
It seems destruction of property has become a tool of the Left more and more. I would suggest that understanding History and historical places would be a much better way of improving one's self. Try to focus on understanding rather than destruction.

As an example I would submit the current destruction of Gaza and Ukraine. Surely we can agree war is wrong. To allow war is wrong. Yet this never ending wars theme among Democrats seems to survive. How is that possible? Why do you support funding foreign wars or US participation? Wouldn't peace be better? That alone is reason to vote for Trump against Biden.

Wow, complete non sequitur.
Yes, destruction of property is a tool of protests, a legitimate one, unlike destruction of people, which is a Right Wing thing.

But that has nothing to do with the Wars Republicans start and Democrats have to get out of.
Unlike Bush's Iraq and Afghanistan, Gaza and Ukraine weren't started by the US and there are no US troops involved.

What is going on in your brain that you think you have an argument by just throwing stuff at the wall?
 
Very Lucid response. I've not made a distinction between any "side" using fake news. Fake news is just that, no matter how you slice it. Please feel free to point out any fake news the right has pushed about Biden. I'll be happy to discuss my opinions. So there's that.

While that could be done, to what point would that be working towards, specifically, that would not be better dealt with in other existing threads? Individual examples are not truly what were in question.

It's a bit dishonest to blame Trump for Coronavirus.

As far as that point goes, that's already been addressed previously and you chose not respond. If you want to go further on that, I would request that you address the previous responses.

With that said, this response is completely wrong-headed if you were attempting to use it to address the point about Trump's coronavirus lies and disinformation. Whether Trump is responsible or not for the coronavirus pandemic is immaterial to how responsible he is for his words and actions in response. Trump spread a LOT of things that he demonstrably knew were false about COVID-19 throughout and plenty more that probably knew was false or untrustworthy. Given his reach and the nature of his following, that had very significant effects. He was probably the single largest driver of coronavirus misinformation. Going further than that -

President Trump has consistently told Americans "the complete opposite" of what his health experts have been telling him in private meetings about COVID-19, according to Olivia Troye, who until recently worked on the the White House coronavirus task force. "They brief him. They tell him the facts. They're telling him the truth. They're telling him things that need to be done," Troye said in an interview with NPR's Ari Shapiro. "And it is a very frustrating environment to work in, when you know that the message that is going to be relayed is counter to what you just told him."

38% of disinformation fueled by Trump? Trump constantly outright lying to the American people? That is NOT something that can be reasonably handwaved away with "the pandemic's not Trump's fault!"

It was a pandemic that shook the World, and still is to a smaller degree. If you're to be honest, you'll admit the majority of Trump hating press worked overtime to misrepresent Trump's statements to their Trump hating audience. The press briefings became unbearable to watch for that reason IMO. About the only thing I learned from the daily press conferences was that the press was seething with hatred for Trump.

If you're to be honest, the problem was far more with Trump and those who were blindly enabling him to act so badly without repercussion or accountability than the press. The press can be said to have acted as they did in fair part because Trump was not being held to account in any more direct way. That's going beyond the corporate angle and the Trump actively working to keep the spotlight on himself even if he had to do it by providing the press with negative stuff, of course.

Regarding honesty of what Presidents or political candidates say. It's difficult to argue any political candidate is honest and has never lied. Most like myself, tend to view the results achieved rather than the candidate's truthfulness. You can't say Biden has never lied, in fact his being caught in a big lie ended one of his attempts at a run for President several years ago.

Both-siderism is a tactic that benefits whichever side is worse. The benefit granted is proportional to how much worse one side is than the other. By trying to reduce the issue in question to the most superficial level "both candidates have lied" and ignoring the massive difference in quantity of, quality of, and harm done by said lies, you're seeking to provide massive benefits to the side that acts worse.


If Biden has done a good job on the economy, inflation and the border, 2024 should be an easy win. If not, Trump may be elected even if from a prison cell.

Should be, perhaps, under a particularly naive understanding of how Republican support is rooted.

To borrow an "it would be great if this wasn't as true as it is" bit of humor from Noel Casler - "How come everything the Republican Party stands for involves other people dying?"

Not completely true, of course, but... If Republicans were doing a good job, their governance probably wouldn't be ending up with higher rates of these things happening?

Spousal abuse

Obesity

Smoking

Teen pregnancy

Sexually transmitted diseases

Abortion

Bankruptcies and poverty

Homicide and suicide

Infant mortality

Maternal mortality

Forcible rape

Robbery and aggravated assault

Dropouts from high school

Divorce

Contaminated air and water

Opiate addiction and deaths

Unskilled workers

Parasitic infections

Income and wealth inequality

Covid deaths and unvaccinated people

Federal subsidies to states (“Red State Welfare”)

People on welfare

Child poverty

Homelessness

Spousal murder

Unemployment

Deaths from auto accidents

People living on disability

Because that's what is happening in general in Republican controlled states compared to Democrat governed states.

Broadly speaking, Republicans don't govern particularly well, with the rising MAGA wing of the party being even worse and often making a mockery of governance where they've come into power. The Republican Party gains power with policies that concentrate power and wealth into the hands of fewer and fewer people and leverage that for their influence, which has most of those listed things as side effects that society suffers. They gain broader support by other, non-policy based means. Whether Biden's done a good job or not with the economy, inflation, and the border is something of a red herring. He HAS done a good job with the economy, inflation, and the border! Republicans have also been OPENLY working to sabotage the US when it comes to all three of those things on top of that! Going further than that, if those were to become less effective for Republicans, they'd just try to change the narrative again to something else that they thought they could blame Biden and the Democrats for. Hence, your claim is deeply naive, to be kind.
 
Last edited:
Both-siderism is a tactic that benefits whichever side is worse. The benefit granted is proportional to how much worse one side is than the other. By trying to reduce the issue in question to the most superficial level "both candidates have lied" and ignoring the massive difference in quantity of, quality of, and harm done by said lies, you're seeking to provide massive benefits to the side that acts worse.

I've started responding to the "they're all the same" nonsense with "only if an ice cube is the same as an iceberg".
 
Wow, complete non sequitur.
Yes, destruction of property is a tool of protests, a legitimate one, unlike destruction of people, which is a Right Wing thing.

But that has nothing to do with the Wars Republicans start and Democrats have to get out of.
Unlike Bush's Iraq and Afghanistan, Gaza and Ukraine weren't started by the US and there are no US troops involved.

What is going on in your brain that you think you have an argument by just throwing stuff ketchup at the wall?

FTFY
 
It seems destruction of property has become a tool of the Left more and more. I would suggest that understanding History and historical places would be a much better way of improving one's self. Try to focus on understanding rather than destruction.

What the hell did General Lee have to do with Charlottesville?
 
It seems destruction of property has become a tool of the Left more and more. I would suggest that understanding History and historical places would be a much better way of improving one's self. Try to focus on understanding rather than destruction.

MAGA Republicans are painfully easy to understand. They have come around before over and over again throughout history. They want a world where they can tell other people what to do, and no one can tell them what to do. That's it. That's all fascism has ever been. All the rest is just BS rationalizations and excuses.

There's only so many times you can go around their intellectual merry-go-round before you realize you are not actually getting anywhere.
 
It seems destruction of property has become a tool of the Left more and more. I would suggest that understanding History and historical places would be a much better way of improving one's self. Try to focus on understanding rather than destruction.

As an example I would submit the current destruction of Gaza and Ukraine. Surely we can agree war is wrong. To allow war is wrong. Yet this never ending wars theme among Democrats seems to survive. How is that possible? Why do you support funding foreign wars or US participation? Wouldn't peace be better? That alone is reason to vote for Trump against Biden.

I wouldn't call tearing down a monument to a traitor and mass murderer destruction of property. But hey, you keep telling us what you are.
 
MAGA Republicans are painfully easy to understand. They have come around before over and over again throughout history. They want a world where they can tell other people what to do, and no one can tell them what to do. That's it. That's all fascism has ever been. All the rest is just BS rationalizations and excuses.

There's only so many times you can go around their intellectual merry-go-round before you realize you are not actually getting anywhere.

Well said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom