For someone who claims to love the Constitution you sure don't seem to know very much about it.
The Fat Orange Turd was not on trial in Colorado. It was a hearing to determine if Section 3 of the 14th amendment applied to him for what he did on January 6th and therefore disqualified him from holding office.
Keep in mind that the leading constitutional scholar of the very conservative Federalist Society, J. Michael Luttig and the very liberal constitutional scholar, Lawrence H. Tribe both think The Fat Orange Turd is (not should be, IS) disqualified from office. When you have two high ranking scholars of entirely opposing political persuasions, both agreeing on something, they need to be taken seriously.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/a...onstitutionally-prohibited-presidency/675048/
Its also worth noting that there has been some terrible reporting and specious claims by the media about disqualification under the 14th Amendment
Several courts other than Colorado have ruled that Trump is not disqualified....
Wrong. So far no court has ruled on disqualification other than Colorado. Some have ruled on technicalities such as lack of standing
https://www.lawfaremedia.org/current-projects/the-trump-trials/section-3-litigation-tracker
Disqualification isn’t likely or right because it would take the decision away from the people.
Wrong. There are others whom the Constitution forbids to hold the office of president - for example, foreign born US citizens, and anyone under 35 years of age.
Disqualifying Trump violates due process.
Wrong. No conviction is required or any other form of due process is needed to deprive anyone of political office. The Fourteenth Amendment is part of the Constitution so it is not overruled by any other provisions, including the due process requirement.
Disqualification is a terrible strategy for the Democrats since Trump can use it to build support.
Wrong. The Colorado case was brought by conservatives, actual Republicans. Disqualification is not a political strategy. It’s the law.
There is no chance the conservative Supreme Court will rule against Trump.
Wrong. While SCOTUS appears very conservative, its political leanings shouldn’t matter, besides which the majority’s conservatism may not align with Trump. The Fat Orange Turd is not a conservative, he’s a populist. Many pundits and members of the public will not understand the difference, but it you can be sure that conservative justices like Roberts and Kavanaugh will understand. Also, conservative justices regularly apply
"original intent", interpreting the Constitution as close as possible to the Framers’ intent.
Its worth noting that SCOTUS has ruled against Trump almost every time he has gone there.
- He tried to overturn the federal law protecting gay and transgender workers from employment discrimination. They ruled 6-3 against - with Gorsuch and Roberts joining the four liberal justices.
- He tried to end the "Dreamers" program - They Ruled 5-4 against - Roberts voting with the liberal justices.
- Trump tried to block Congress from getting his tax records - They refused with no dissents.
- Trump tried to block release of White House records relating to Jan 6 insurrection - they ruled 8-1 against (no prizes for guessing which justice dissented)