• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed General Israel/Palestine discussion thread - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, webfusion said 250,000 dead Gazans would be fine and dandy, and nobody on the Israel side disagreed.

Raw numbers aren't the focus, after all. Nor are casualty ratios in war particularly moving. War isn't something where enforcing 1 to 1 ratios is even remotely sane in the first place, so trying to push arguments that rely on something remarkably similar aren't going to be received well.

There are lots of dead Palestinians, including civilians and kids in Gaza? Yeah, it's terrible, but the blood's primarily on Hamas' hands. They set the playing field for it to happen in a bunch of ways. They triggered it. They're continuing it. None of which was or is for any remotely laudable purpose. Going a step further, they're the ones who have made it so that we outsiders can't meaningfully determine whether they're legitimate collateral damage or not. Given that we can't determine such because of Hamas' actions, withholding judgement until we actually have sufficient evidence from sources other than Hamas (and preferably Israel) is the only actually responsible course of action, however much it's tempting to simply react based on shock and horror.

To poke at a decidedly USA-based analogy - Policemen murdering people is a case where the policemen should be held accountable. People committing suicide by policemen is a case where the policemen should not be held accountable.
 
Last edited:
Raw numbers aren't the focus, after all. Nor are casualty ratios in war particularly moving. War isn't something where enforcing 1 to 1 ratios is even remotely sane in the first place, so trying to push arguments that rely on something remarkably similar aren't going to be received well.

Raw numbers are just data. Data should be available to all, to make their own conclusions.

There are lots of dead Palestinians, including civilians and kids in Gaza? Yeah, it's terrible, but the blood's primarily on Hamas' hands. They set the playing field for it to happen in a bunch of ways. They triggered it. They're continuing it. None of which was or is for any remotely laudable purpose.

How much would you agree with the following statement?

Anyone of sound mind is responsible for their own actions.

Going a step further, they're the ones who have made it so that we outsiders can't meaningfully determine whether they're legitimate collateral damage or not. Given that we can't determine such because of Hamas' actions, withholding judgement until we actually have sufficient evidence from sources other than Hamas (and preferably Israel) is the only actually responsible course of action, however much it's tempting to simply react based on shock and horror.

"Legitimate collateral damage", when the subject is the lives of innocent people. What a psychopathic thing to say.

To poke at a decidedly USA-based analogy - Policemen murdering people is a case where the policemen should be held accountable. People committing suicide by policemen is a case where the policemen should not be held accountable.

There was a case, last year, where American police opened fire on a suspect with a gun. They hit bystanders behind the suspect. Is that "legitimate collateral damage"?

https://news.yahoo.com/denver-police-opened-fire-crowd-234222431.html?fr=yhssrp_catchall
 
Raw numbers aren't the focus, after all. Nor are casualty ratios in war particularly moving. War isn't something where enforcing 1 to 1 ratios is even remotely sane in the first place, so trying to push arguments that rely on something remarkably similar aren't going to be received well.

There are lots of dead Palestinians, including civilians and kids in Gaza? Yeah, it's terrible, but the blood's primarily on Hamas' hands. They set the playing field for it to happen in a bunch of ways. They triggered it. They're continuing it. None of which was or is for any remotely laudable purpose. Going a step further, they're the ones who have made it so that we outsiders can't meaningfully determine whether they're legitimate collateral damage or not. Given that we can't determine such because of Hamas' actions, withholding judgement until we actually have sufficient evidence from sources other than Hamas (and preferably Israel) is the only actually responsible course of action, however much it's tempting to simply react based on shock and horror.

To poke at a decidedly USA-based analogy - Policemen murdering people is a case where the policemen should be held accountable. People committing suicide by policemen is a case where the policemen should not be held accountable.

Perhaps the individual police officer should not be held to account, but both to protect the policeman or woman and the victim, the system / government should be held to account.

All to often each case is looked at individually and nothing is done to change the system and prevent the same thing happening again in future. That is what we are seeing with Israel / Palestine.

There are some posting here who only look at the current events and believe the solution to violence is more and bigger violence. Who are implying that Gaza is committing suicide by police officer so killing Gazans is excusable and the person doing the killing should not be held to account. Whilst 'just following orders' is not a defence, but the system should be held to account. Others look at the repeated nature of events, that violence and more violence by both sides has failed, and perhaps a non-violent solution is needed.
 
Well, webfusion said 250,000 dead Gazans would be fine and dandy, and nobody on the Israel side disagreed.



Webfusion also seems to think I'm American, and that jingoistic nationalism works on me, not realising the irony.

At least webfusion was clear. Given the population of Gaza is about 2.5 million, this is literal decimation. On current figures this will include about 100,000 children killed. Webfusion thinks killing 100,000 Palestinian children is reasonable.

Hamas has perhaps 1,000 regular combatants, perhaps 50,000 counting 'reserves'. So this is setting a standard of killing 50 civilians for every combatant, (ratio of 2:1 in WW2). But we have a standard 50:1 civilian to combatant deaths is proportionate. During the criminal massacre of 7 October carried out by Hamas the civilian to combatant ratio was 4:1.
 
Raw numbers are just data. Data should be available to all, to make their own conclusions.

Sure. Provided that all the relevant data is actually available. If only the data that's been effectively cherry-picked to support some position is available, complaints like webfusion's have some basis.


How much would you agree with the following statement?

Anyone of sound mind is responsible for their own actions.

Mostly. With that said, such neglects the circumstances and how those circumstances were shaped, though. "Personal responsibility" has often been used as a shield by those who set things up to happen so that only the person who euphemistically pulls the trigger actually faces accountability.


"Legitimate collateral damage", when the subject is the lives of innocent people. What a psychopathic thing to say.

That's war for you. The lives of innocent people potentially being "legitimate collateral damage" is actually to reduce the damage and death caused to innocent people in the big picture, either way. Otherwise, using innocent people as human shields in various manners would end up being acceptable war tactics. I find that to be the far worse and more psychopathic option of the two. Your opinion may differ, of course. *shrug*


There was a case, last year, where American police opened fire on a suspect with a gun. They hit bystanders behind the suspect. Is that "legitimate collateral damage"?

A bunch of cases like that, probably, given the US (and how crappy the aim of waaay too many cops is). I can't give sweeping generalities on the subject any more than I can give sweeping generalities about Gaza. That would be a matter to be determined case by case in the courts, much as there are real complaints that can be leveled at the US' courts, especially after the advent of qualified immunity in 1967.

Perhaps the individual police officer should not be held to account, but both to protect the policeman or woman and the victim, the system / government should be held to account.

In case of a person seeking to commit suicide and choosing to try to force a cop's hand to do it, rather than committing suicide by causing more direct self-harm? That's difficult to justify.

All to often each case is looked at individually and nothing is done to change the system and prevent the same thing happening again in future. That is what we are seeing with Israel / Palestine.

Broader scale is a different matter, yes, though. As poked at above in my response to ThatGuy11200, the circumstances and how the circumstances were shaped are very much things of relevance to provide context and the larger picture in play. It does get a bit more complicated for Israel/Palestine, though, quite frankly. These are different entities with different governments. How the Palestinian government chooses to act is not the responsibility of the Israeli government and how the Israeli government acts is not the responsibility of the Palestinian government. If one or both sides acts to stoke hatred as government policy, the options for what the other can do about it are rather limited.

There are some posting here who only look at the current events and believe the solution to violence is more and bigger violence. Who are implying that Gaza is committing suicide by police officer so killing Gazans is excusable and the person doing the killing should not be held to account.

War is horrible. A small bit of advice? Don't let the horrible stir your emotions to the point that rationality and comprehension is tossed out the window.

Whilst 'just following orders' is not a defence, but the system should be held to account. Others look at the repeated nature of events, that violence and more violence by both sides has failed, and perhaps a non-violent solution is needed.

Non-violent solutions can only work when both sides actually want non-violent solutions, though. Terrible as it is, at many points in history, non-violent solutions have only become possible after truly horrifying amounts of violence. As much as we might love to jump ahead to the non-violence, it's not always an actual option.
 
Last edited:
War is horrible. A small bit of advice? Don't let the horrible stir your emotions to the point that rationality and comprehension is tossed out the window.

This is a lesson that should be, but hasn't been, learned by either side in this conflict. Israel is most guilty of it right now.
 
Raw numbers are just data. Data should be available to all, to make their own conclusions.



How much would you agree with the following statement?

Anyone of sound mind is responsible for their own actions.



"Legitimate collateral damage", when the subject is the lives of innocent people. What a psychopathic thing to say.



There was a case, last year, where American police opened fire on a suspect with a gun. They hit bystanders behind the suspect. Is that "legitimate collateral damage"?

https://news.yahoo.com/denver-police-opened-fire-crowd-234222431.html?fr=yhssrp_catchall

"Legitimate collateral damage" is just a shorter way of saying "the trolley problem is no more a problem than the twin paradox is a paradox".
 
According to Netanyahu using the Bible as his warrant... all of them... except perhaps the virgin little girls they might keep for sex-slaves.

I was thinking earlier what an excellent time it is to not acknowledge the New Testament. Not that it makes any difference to christians promoting wars, but it's good to have a guidebook that doesn't contradict the idea of sippenhaft and rape.

They're certainly doing their bit to stop new terrorists.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/middl...orchlight-as-airstrikes-cripple-health-system

Well, webfusion said 250,000 dead Gazans would be fine and dandy, and nobody on the Israel side disagreed.

Sounds fair - that's neatly over the 100:1 ratio of dead Israel and USA like to work on.

One death is tragedy, one million deaths is statistic.

Raw numbers aren't the focus, after all.

See above.
 
A little-known name in American politics, Dalia Al-Aqidi, came to visit Israel, in a show of support
https://www.jpost.com/american-politics/article-771190.

Just from hearing her speak, this was like a breath of fresh air in today's choking dust-storm of nonsense and lies.

I only mention this (American politics isn't the subject of the thread) because of her pure support for what's right and just these days.

I decided to come here (the interview was conducted in Tel Aviv -ed.) to show solidarity with the Israelis, with the Jewish people to tell the Jewish people that you’re not alone. This is not your fight by yourself.

It’s us. Muslims; Christians; everybody should fight against terrorists.
 
This is a lesson that should be, but hasn't been, learned by either side in this conflict. Israel is most guilty of it right now.

This conflict is not just between two sides.
It never has been, dating back all the way to the late 1800's.
Some of the participants in the conflict have indeed learned a lesson regarding rationality and self-interests. Jordan's King certainly understood which side of his toast gets the butter. Gen Sisi seems to know what's up. Even our arch-nemesis Assad jr. up there in Damascus, he's grokking.
Lebanon has a bit of a problem even functioning at all on any given day, so the last thing they want is a quick trip back into the Bronze Age.

Israel may be guilty of many things, but tossing rationality and comprehension out the window is not one of the faults displayed these days by the Israeli leadership and military.
They're making sure they cross their t's and dot their i's with the knowledge that the ICC is watching closely. Every mission is scrutinized beforehand by legal teams, literally.
Hamas, not so much.
 
Last edited:
No Israel is acting extremely rational -
because the goal is not to find a peaceful solution, but a permanent conflict that will guarantee permanent money, arms and protection from the US.
 
No Israel is acting extremely rational -
because the goal is not to find a peaceful solution, but to keep a permanent conflict going that will guarantee permanent money, arms and protection from the US.
 
No Israel is acting extremely rational -
because the goal is not to find a peaceful solution, but a permanent conflict that will guarantee permanent money, arms and protection from the US.

We've lost another 16 young men just today, in an effort to win this war.
Israel winning this war can turn the Gazans onto a peaceful path. They'll be free, from Hamas.

The USA has interests that directly coincide with Israel's.
If you feel that the government you have is not representing those interests to your liking, the 1st Amendment guarantees the right to redress your grievances.
(See: yesterday in Congress, display of bloodied hands in support of Hamas)
 
We've lost another 16 young men just today, in an effort to win this war.
Israel winning this war can turn the Gazans onto a peaceful path. They'll be free, from Hamas.

The USA has interests that directly coincide with Israel's.
If you feel that the government you have is not representing those interests to your liking, the 1st Amendment guarantees the right to redress your grievances.
(See: yesterday in Congress, display of bloodied hands in support of Hamas)

what, EXACTLY, does winning this war MEAN, you think?
Do you think for a SECOND that removing Hamas, but leaving everything that gave it power in place, plus a grudge from a brutal war, will bring peace?
Seriously?
 
what, EXACTLY, does winning this war MEAN, you think?
Do you think for a SECOND that removing Hamas, but leaving everything that gave it power in place, plus a grudge from a brutal war, will bring peace?
Seriously?

Imposition of a peaceful PalestineState (on the pre-June 6, 1967 lines as known from the 1949 Rhodes Armistice with Egypt) is the end game here. That's right, they'll have a Nation-State, with all the responsibilities and demands that go along with that.

East Jerusalem? (al-Quds and al-Aqsa) Those are strictly in the purview of both the State of Israel and the Kingdom of Jordan (as caretakers of the Islamic Holy Site). The NewPalestineState will have no role in that sector, it's been out of their control for half-a-century, and will remain so.
Israel will work with international partners (including China) to connect this NewState with maglev line into the hills of Hebron (al-Khalil), and from there, a short bus ride up to al-Quds.
For most Gazans, it will be their first chance ever to go up to the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif.
Israel is only too happy for this to come about. Seriously.
 
Imposition of a peaceful PalestineState (on the pre-June 6, 1967 lines as known from the 1949 Rhodes Armistice with Egypt) is the end game here. That's right, they'll have a Nation-State, with all the responsibilities and demands that go along with that.

East Jerusalem? (al-Quds and al-Aqsa) Those are strictly in the purview of both the State of Israel and the Kingdom of Jordan (as caretakers of the Islamic Holy Site). The NewPalestineState will have no role in that sector, it's been out of their control for half-a-century, and will remain so.
Israel will work with international partners (including China) to connect this NewState with maglev line into the hills of Hebron (al-Khalil), and from there, a short bus ride up to al-Quds.
For most Gazans, it will be their first chance ever to go up to the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif.
Israel is only too happy for this to come about. Seriously.

I'm missing any of these plans from the current Israeli leadership's plans.
but I do see some very, VERY different plans coming for current Israeli ministers and their base.

Also, why didn't Israel do this the last time they occupied Gaza?
 
I'm missing any of these plans from the current Israeli leadership's plans.
but I do see some very, VERY different plans coming for current Israeli ministers and their base.

Also, why didn't Israel do this the last time they occupied Gaza?

You asked me what I think, not what anyone else is thinking. I gave you my outlook on the process that might take shape after the Hamas leaders are eliminated.
There are several people in positions of influence that probably envision it this way also.
The current Israeli government is working on a day-to-day tactical operation, with Houthis declaring war, with Hezbollah itching on the trigger finger, with Hamas throwing everything they have at the IDF in close-quarters fighting. (and the Hamas is losing those battles, badly)

Not too many Israelis are sitting around wondering about any Palestinian State right now.

Israel occupied Gaza in the 1956 Suez/Sinai War, withdrew, and retook it during Six Days in June, 1967. In 2005, the Israelis walked away, lock stock and barrel. When are you referring to when saying "the last time they occupied Gaza?"
 
You asked me what I think, not what anyone else is thinking. I gave you my outlook on the process that might take shape after the Hamas leaders are eliminated.
There are several people in positions of influence that probably envision it this way also.
The current Israeli government is working on a day-to-day tactical operation, with Houthis declaring war, with Hezbollah itching on the trigger finger, with Hamas throwing everything they have at the IDF in close-quarters fighting. (and the Hamas is losing those battles, badly)

Not too many Israelis are sitting around wondering about any Palestinian State right now.

Israel occupied Gaza in the 1956 Suez/Sinai War, withdrew, and retook it during Six Days in June, 1967. In 2005, the Israelis walked away, lock stock and barrel. When are you referring to when saying "the last time they occupied Gaza?"

But you haven't said if you think it's likely to happen.
 
What is LIKELY to happen? I think it is likely that without Hamas and the rest of those maniac jihadists, both in Gaza and across the hills of Judea and Samaria, the Palestinian Arabs can join the rest of civilization now in the 21st Century. They have been held back by the incredible failures of their leadership for so many years now, I've lost track.

By the way, Hamas revealed that seven of the captives were killed during the bombing inside the Jabliya neighborhood. OK, then let's see the bodies, turn them over to Red Crescent/Red Cross, for proper burial. (along with all other Israeli cadavers they hold). That's a reasonable ask, no?
 
When are you referring to when saying "the last time they occupied Gaza?"


They never did stop doing so... making an open air prison out of it is not stopping occupying it.

The Germans did not stop occupying the Auschwitz part of Poland... The Afrikaans did not make another country out of their Bantustans.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom