On the stroke of midnight
All times are approximate in reference to bow visor coming loose.
mid-point of journey distance-wise
And?
mid-point of journey time-wise
Nope.
sunk withoout trace of debris or flotsam within 35mins
the only comparable times of sinking are ships destroyed by military attack
Hogwash. Utter hogwash. I can list dozens of large ships going to the bottom in foul weather quickly, with no debris field. And Estonia's passenger accommodations and features were internal (meaning the stuff is on the inside of the ship). And it was a dark and stormy night, meaning the crew lashed everything down before sailing.
massive breach in the hull - not mentioned by JAIC - so 'classified'.
It wasn't there at the time of the sinking.
military vehicles seen loaded at last minute
Allegedly.
Capt Andresson not at the stern
Weird, almost as if his ship was in trouble, and he was trying to save it.
winchman received top military combat honours 'FOR OPERATIONS'.
Which has been patiently explained to you many times. The US Army and US Marines have issued citations and medals to soldiers and Marines who've rescued civilians a few time this year alone. Nothing strange here. And any smart person who has reviewed the footage of the rescue of the Estonia survivors it is painfully clear why such medals were awarded.
British naval explosives experts Braidwood & Fellows recognised a hexacomposite device on the bow undetonated.
They're wrong.
independent university academics cannot rule out explosive deformation of metal at the bow.
Two "academics" paid by the company couldn't rule them out, but they also couldn't rule them in. Just as a recent study by JREF forum study cannot rule out eels or sharks with frickin' lasers on their heads as causing the sinking.
Prof Ida Westermann of Norway Uni of Technology could rule out 'normal friction' such as pounding of waves.
And what did old Ida say about abnormal pounding. And did she know the Estonia was not built for open-ocean transit? Does Ida understand the difference in engineering and design between ships that work near-shore, and river environments, and the design requirements for oceangoing vessels?
And what does Ida say now that we know the certificate of seaworthiness was fraudulent, and the Estonia should never have put to sea in the first place?
[*NOTE: This certificate is an actual conspiracy, obviously ignored because it relfects the usual eastern European/post-Soviet era corruption, and not sooper sexy spie intergue.]
The fact the Swedish government demanded to have the vessel covered in concrete instead of bringing home the bodies.
Maybe they should have allowed scavengers to pick the wreck clean, and bring suffering to the families instead.
